IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v143y2024ics0264837724001650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does existing mixed land development promote the urban spatial composite function? Evidence from Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Qiyu
  • Shen, Wencang
  • Yan, Jinming
  • Kong, Weilong
  • Li, Wei
  • Zhang, Zhengfeng

Abstract

Urban development in China is entering an era of stock space utilisation. Herein, the spatial composite utilisation is a crucial approach to high-quality urban spatial development. Deconstructing the traditional notion of mixed land use indicates that mixed land development driven by the land market may significantly impact urban spatial composite function (USCF). To assess this effect, we analysed the theoretical mechanisms affecting the USCF in a coupled human-land spatial system. Using 296 town street units in Beijing, China for the spatial analysis of geographic big data, we employed an econometric model to examine the spatial composite functional effects of urban mixed land development (UMLD). The results indicated that the USCF strengthened alongside the maturation of the land market, while the intensity effect of the mixed land development was less pronounced. UMLD significantly promoted the spatial composite function, primarily contingent on the effects within the unit itself. Population density and UMLD exhibited a substitutive relationship in their impact on the USCF, and excessively high population density may attenuate the positive marginal effect of UMLD. Through instrumental variable methods and replacement variable estimations, the results were confirmed as robust. Therefore, the reform in the supply and development mechanisms of existing construction land should be deepened to stimulate market-oriented mixed land development and enhance the vitality of sustained urban spatial functional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Qiyu & Shen, Wencang & Yan, Jinming & Kong, Weilong & Li, Wei & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2024. "Does existing mixed land development promote the urban spatial composite function? Evidence from Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:143:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724001650
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724001650
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 7-18, January.
    2. Fujie Rao & Kim Dovey, 2021. "Shopping and Urbanity: Emerging Assemblages of Main Street, Mall, and Power Centre," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 747-764, October.
    3. Anqi Zhang & Weifeng Li & Jiayu Wu & Jian Lin & Jianqun Chu & Chang Xia, 2021. "How can the urban landscape affect urban vitality at the street block level? A case study of 15 metropolises in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1245-1262, June.
    4. Zhou, Xingang & Yeh, Anthony G.O. & Yue, Yang & Li, Weifeng, 2022. "Residential-employment mixed use and jobs-housing balance: A case study of Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Nathan Nunn & Leonard Wantchekon, 2011. "The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3221-3252, December.
    6. Lamb, Russell L., 2003. "Inverse productivity: land quality, labor markets, and measurement error," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 71-95, June.
    7. Jacqueline Oehri & Bernhard Schmid & Gabriela Schaepman-Strub & Pascal A. Niklaus, 2020. "Terrestrial land-cover type richness is positively linked to landscape-level functioning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Bo Huang & Yulun Zhou & Zhigang Li & Yimeng Song & Jixuan Cai & Wei Tu, 2020. "Evaluating and characterizing urban vibrancy using spatial big data: Shanghai as a case study," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(9), pages 1543-1559, November.
    9. Xing, Menglin & Liu, Xiaojun & Luo, Fuzhou, 2023. "How does the development of urban agglomeration affect the electricity efficiency of resource-based cities?—An empirical research based on the fsQCA method," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Walid Oueslati & Julien Salanié & JunJie Wu, 2019. "Urbanization and agricultural productivity: some lessons from European cities," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 225-249.
    11. Ha Na Im & Chang Gyu Choi, 2019. "The hidden side of the entropy-based land-use mix index: Clarifying the relationship between pedestrian volume and land-use mix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1865-1881, July.
    12. Jiale Zhou & Xiaofen Yu & Xizan Jin & Nuannuan Mao, 2021. "Government Competition, Land Supply Structure and Semi-Urbanization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Boucekkine, R. & Fabbri, G. & Gozzi, F., 2014. "Egalitarianism under population change: Age structure does matter," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 86-100.
    14. Nayan, Nakul kumar & Das, Arup & Mukerji, Arjun & Mazumder, Taraknath & Bera, Subhas, 2020. "Spatio-temporal dynamics of water resources of Hyderabad Metropolitan Area and its relationship with urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Motieyan, Hamid & Azmoodeh, Mohammad, 2021. "Mixed-use distribution index: A novel bilevel measure to address urban land-use mix pattern (A case study in Tehran, Iran)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. O’Driscoll, Conor & Crowley, Frank & Doran, Justin & McCarthy, Nóirín, 2023. "Land-use mixing in Irish cities: Implications for sustainable development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    17. Whitten, Guy D. & Williams, Laron K. & Wimpy, Cameron, 2021. "Interpretation: the final spatial frontier," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 140-156, January.
    18. Hainmueller, Jens & Mummolo, Jonathan & Xu, Yiqing, 2019. "How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 163-192, April.
    19. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Efficiency and distribution of rural construction land marketization in contemporary China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    20. Carlos Cinelli & Chad Hazlett, 2020. "Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(1), pages 39-67, February.
    21. Chris Jacobs-Crisioni & Piet Rietveld & Eric Koomen & Emmanouil Tranos, 2014. "Evaluating the Impact of Land-Use Density and Mix on Spatiotemporal Urban Activity Patterns: An Exploratory Study Using Mobile Phone Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2769-2785, November.
    22. Jedwab, Remi & Pereira, Daniel & Roberts, Mark, 2021. "Cities of workers, children or seniors? Stylized facts and possible implications for growth in a global sample of cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    23. Peter Hull & Michal Kolesár & Christopher Walters, 2022. "Labor by design: contributions of David Card, Joshua Angrist, and Guido Imbens," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(3), pages 603-645, July.
    24. He, Qingsong & He, Weishan & Song, Yan & Wu, Jiayu & Yin, Chaohui & Mou, Yanchuan, 2018. "The impact of urban growth patterns on urban vitality in newly built-up areas based on an association rules analysis using geographical ‘big data’," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 726-738.
    25. Kantor, Yuval & Rietveld, Piet & van Ommeren, Jos, 2014. "Towards a general theory of mixed zones: The role of congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 50-58.
    26. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Response to Commentaries on “Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?”," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(2), pages 151-158, April.
    27. Wang, Xiaoxi & Zhang, Yaojun & Yu, Danlin & Qi, Jinghan & Li, Shujing, 2022. "Investigating the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vibrancy and its determinants: Spatial big data analyses in Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Danilina & Anna Korobeinikova & Irina Teplova, 2024. "Decision-Making Approach for Land Use in Urban Industrial Area Redevelopment Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-33, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiquan Zhang & Lizhu Du & Xiaoyun Song, 2024. "Identification of Urban Renewal Potential Areas and Analysis of Influential Factors from the Perspective of Vitality Enhancement: A Case Study of Harbin City’s Core Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Jinyao Lin & Yaye Zhuang & Yang Zhao & Hua Li & Xiaoyu He & Siyan Lu, 2022. "Measuring the Non-Linear Relationship between Three-Dimensional Built Environment and Urban Vitality Based on a Random Forest Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Hongyu Gong & Xiaozihan Wang & Zihao Wang & Ziyi Liu & Qiushan Li & Yunhan Zhang, 2022. "How Did the Built Environment Affect Urban Vibrancy? A Big Data Approach to Post-Disaster Revitalization Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Xuefeng Huang & Penghui Jiang & Manchun Li & Xin Zhao, 2022. "Applicable Framework for Evaluating Urban Vitality with Multiple-Source Data: Empirical Research of the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration Using BPNN," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    6. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Mouratidis, Kostas & Ettema, Dick & Næss, Petter, 2019. "Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 306-320.
    8. Li, Xiaomeng & Neal, Zachary P., 2022. "Are larger cities more central in urban networks: A meta-analysis," OSF Preprints y3s69, Center for Open Science.
    9. Faizeh Hatami & Jean-Claude Thill, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evaluation of the Built Environment’s Impact on Commuting Duration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    11. Bindong Sun & Rui Guo & Chun Yin, 2023. "Inequity on suburban campuses: University students disadvantaged in self‐improvement travel," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 404-420, June.
    12. Bautista-Hernández, Dorian Antonio & Trejo Nieto, Alejandra, 2024. "Who uses transit in the journey to work? Multimodality, equity, and planning implications in México City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Chun Yin & Bindong Sun, 2020. "Does Compact Built Environment Help to Reduce Obesity? Influence of Population Density on Waist–Hip Ratio in Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Gao, Jiong & Ma, Shoufeng & Zou, Hongyang & Du, Huibin, 2023. "How does population agglomeration influence the adoption of new energy vehicles? Evidence from 290 cities in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2019. "Influences of the built environment on travel: A household-based perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 710-724.
    16. Nazari, Fatemeh & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2023. "Modeling vehicle-miles of travel accounting for latent heterogeneity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 45-53.
    17. Christopher Wiley Shay, 2023. "Swords into ploughshares? Why human rights abuses persist after resistance campaigns," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(1), pages 141-156, January.
    18. Schmid, Basil & Becker, Felix & Axhausen, Kay W. & Widmer, Paul & Stein, Petra, 2023. "A simultaneous model of residential location, mobility tool ownership and mode choice using latent variables," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Boeing, Geoff & Riggs, William, 2022. "Converting One-Way Streets to Two-Way Streets to Improve Transportation Network Efficiency and Reduce Vehicle Distance Traveled," SocArXiv fyhbc, Center for Open Science.
    20. Pengl, Yannick I. & Roessler, Philip & Rueda, Valeria, 2022. "Cash Crops, Print Technologies, and the Politicization of Ethnicity in Africa," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 116(1), pages 181-199, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:143:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724001650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.