IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v46y2014i11p2769-2785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Impact of Land-Use Density and Mix on Spatiotemporal Urban Activity Patterns: An Exploratory Study Using Mobile Phone Data

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Jacobs-Crisioni

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Land Management and Natural Hazards Unit, Via E. Fermi, 2749, 21027 Ispra (Va), Italy)

  • Piet Rietveld
  • Eric Koomen
  • Emmanouil Tranos

    (School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences (GEES), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, England)

Abstract

Dense and mixed land-use configurations are assumed to encourage high and prolonged activity levels, which in turn are considered to be important for the condition of urban neighbourhoods. We used mobile phone usage data recorded in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, as a proxy for urban activity to test whether the density in different forms of urban land use increases the level of activity in urban areas, and whether mixed land uses can prolong high levels of activity in an area. Our results indicate that higher densities correspond with higher activity levels, mixed land uses do indeed diversify urban activity dynamics and colocating particular land uses prolongs high activity levels in the evening hours. We proceed to demonstrate that mixed activity provisions and high urban activity levels coincide with urban neighbourhoods that are considered attractive places in which to live and work, while lower activity levels and markedly low activity mixes coincide with neighbourhoods that are considered disadvantaged.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Jacobs-Crisioni & Piet Rietveld & Eric Koomen & Emmanouil Tranos, 2014. "Evaluating the Impact of Land-Use Density and Mix on Spatiotemporal Urban Activity Patterns: An Exploratory Study Using Mobile Phone Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2769-2785, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2769-2785
    DOI: 10.1068/a130309p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a130309p
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a130309p?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Currid & Sarah Williams, 2010. "The geography of buzz: art, culture and the social milieu in Los Angeles and New York," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 423-451, May.
    2. James Lesage & Manfred Fischer, 2008. "Spatial Growth Regressions: Model Specification, Estimation and Interpretation," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 275-304.
    3. Luc Anselin & Nancy Lozano-Gracia, 2009. "Errors in variables and spatial effects in hedonic house price models of ambient air quality," Studies in Empirical Economics, in: Giuseppe Arbia & Badi H. Baltagi (ed.), Spatial Econometrics, pages 5-34, Springer.
    4. Cervero, Robert, 1996. "Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 361-377, September.
    5. Manaugh, Kevin & Kreider, Tyler, 2013. "What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(1), pages 63-72.
    6. David Wheeler & Michael Tiefelsdorf, 2005. "Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 161-187, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiwei Bai & Yihang Bai & Ruoyu Wang & Tianren Yang & Xinyao Song & Bo Bai, 2023. "Exploring Associations between the Built Environment and Cycling Behaviour around Urban Greenways from a Human-Scale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Lingjun Tang & Yu Lin & Sijia Li & Sheng Li & Jingyi Li & Fu Ren & Chao Wu, 2018. "Exploring the Influence of Urban Form on Urban Vibrancy in Shenzhen Based on Mobile Phone Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Hanbing Yang & Li Wang & Feng Tang & Meichen Fu & Yuqing Xiong, 2024. "Differences in Urban Vibrancy Enhancement among Different Mixed Land Use Types: Evidence from Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Wenze Yue & Yang Chen & Qun Zhang & Yong Liu, 2019. "Spatial Explicit Assessment of Urban Vitality Using Multi-Source Data: A Case of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Eda Ustaoglu & Chris Jacobs-Crisioni, 2022. "What Drives Residential Land Expansion and Densification? An Analysis of Growing and Shrinking Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Wang, Sen & Kong, Ningning Nicole & Gao, Yi, 2024. "Use mobile location data to infer airport catchment areas and calibrate Huff gravity model in the New York metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Jie Zheng & Guodong Chen & Tiantian Zhang & Mingjing Ding & Binglin Liu & Hao Wang, 2021. "Exploring Spatial Variations in the Relationships between Landscape Functions and Human Activities in Suburban Rural Communities: A Case Study in Jiangning District, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Hanbing Yang & Meichen Fu & Li Wang & Feng Tang, 2021. "Mixed Land Use Evaluation and Its Impact on Housing Prices in Beijing Based on Multi-Source Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Wu, Wenjie & Wang, Jianghao & Li, Chengyu & Wang, Mark, 2016. "The geography of city liveliness and consumption: evidence from location-based big data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83642, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Emmanouil Tranos & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Mobile phone usage in complex urban systems: a space–time, aggregated human activity study," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 157-185, April.
    11. Spyridon Spyratos & Demetris Stathakis & Michael Lutz & Chrisa Tsinaraki, 2017. "Using Foursquare place data for estimating building block use," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(4), pages 693-717, July.
    12. Hu, Qiyu & Shen, Wencang & Yan, Jinming & Kong, Weilong & Li, Wei & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2024. "Does existing mixed land development promote the urban spatial composite function? Evidence from Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Chengyu Li & Mark Wang & Jianghao Wang & Wenjie Wu, 2016. "The Geography of City Liveliness and Land Use Configurations: Evidence from Location-Based Big Data in Beijing," SERC Discussion Papers 0201, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Yunzi Yang & Yuanyuan Ma & Hongzan Jiao, 2021. "Exploring the Correlation between Block Vitality and Block Environment Based on Multisource Big Data: Taking Wuhan City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Suji Kim, 2020. "Urban Vitality, Urban Form, and Land Use: Their Relations within a Geographical Boundary for Walkers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Yating Fan & Da Kuang & Wei Tu & Yu Ye, 2023. "Which Spatial Elements Influence Waterfront Space Vitality the Most?—A Comparative Tracking Study of the Maozhou River Renewal Project in Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Psaltoglou, Artemis & Calle, Eusebi, 2018. "Enhanced connectivity index – A new measure for identifying critical points in urban public transportation networks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 22-32.
    18. Lixin Liu & Yanjun Dong & Wei Lang & Huiyu Yang & Bin Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Commercial-Industry Development of Urban Vitality: A Study on the Central Urban Area of Guangzhou Using Multisource Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Ruoshi Zhang, 2023. "Evaluation of Emotional Attachment Characteristics of Small-Scale Urban Vitality Space Based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, Integrating Entropy Weight Method and Gr," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bivand, Roger & Piras, Gianfranco, 2015. "Comparing Implementations of Estimation Methods for Spatial Econometrics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i18).
    2. Mendieta, Rodrigo & Ontaneda, Diego & Pontarollo, Nicola, 2019. "Canton growth in Ecuador and the role of spatial heterogeneity," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    3. Arnab Bhattacharjee & Ornella Maietta & Fernanda Mazzotta, 2023. "Spatial agglomeration, innovation and firm survival for Italian manufacturing firms," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 318-345, July.
    4. Marbuah, George & Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin, 2017. "Spatial analysis of emissions in Sweden," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 383-394.
    5. Bo Pieter Johannes Andree & Francisco Blasques & Eric Koomen, 2017. "Smooth Transition Spatial Autoregressive Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-050/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Geniaux, Ghislain & Martinetti, Davide, 2018. "A new method for dealing simultaneously with spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity in regression models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-85.
    7. Liv Osland & Gwilym Pryce, 2012. "Housing Prices and Multiple Employment Nodes: Is the Relationship Nonmonotonic?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 1182-1208, November.
    8. Steven R Gehrke & Kelly J Clifton, 2019. "An activity-related land use mix construct and its connection to pedestrian travel," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(1), pages 9-26, January.
    9. Yuefei Zhuo & Xin Jing & Xiaoying Wang & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yang Chen & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Rise and Fall of Land Use Mix: Review and Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Anping Chen & Marlon Boarnet & Mark Partridge & Wenjie Wu & Guanpeng Dong, 2014. "Valuing The “Green” Amenities In A Spatial Context," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 569-585, September.
    11. Domenica Panzera & Paolo Postiglione, 2014. "Economic growth in Italian NUTS 3 provinces," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(1), pages 273-293, August.
    12. Giuseppe Arbia, 2011. "A Lustrum of SEA: Recent Research Trends Following the Creation of the Spatial Econometrics Association (2007--2011)," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 377-395, July.
    13. Zhou, Xingang & Yeh, Anthony G.O. & Yue, Yang & Li, Weifeng, 2022. "Residential-employment mixed use and jobs-housing balance: A case study of Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Wenjie Wu & Guanpeng Dong & Wenzhong Zhang, 2017. "The puzzling heterogeneity of amenity capitalization effects on land markets," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 135-153, March.
    15. Byunghak Min & Gunwon Lee & Seiyong Kim, 2021. "Effects of Land-Use Characteristics on Transport Mode Choices by Purpose of Travel in Seoul, South Korea, Based on Spatial Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Daniel Arribas-Bel & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2016. "The sociocultural sources of urban buzz," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(1), pages 188-204, February.
    17. Fahad Ahmed Shaikh & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Saima Kalwar, 2022. "Factors Influencing Residential Location Choice towards Mixed Land-Use Development: An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, November.
    18. repec:rri:wpaper:201303 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Chocholatá Michaela & Furková Andrea, 2017. "Regional Disparities in Education Attainment Level in the European Union: A Spatial Approach," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 107-131, October.
    20. Cho, Seong-Hoon & Kim, Heeho & Roberts, Roland K. & Kim, Taeyoung & Lee, Daegoon, 2014. "Effects of changes in forestland ownership on deforestation and urbanization and the resulting effects on greenhouse gas emissions," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 93-109.
    21. Li, Jingjing & Kim, Changjoo & Sang, Sunhee, 2018. "Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 141-147.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2769-2785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.