IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v141y2024ics0264837724001078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon reduction of urban form strategies: Regional heterogeneity in Yangtze River Delta, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Yushan
  • Xu, Yuanshuo

Abstract

Urban land forms play a pivotal role in sustainable development. The ongoing theoretical debate between centralized and decentralized views of urban form strategies underscores the intricate impacts of urban forms on carbon reduction. These impacts are argued to be contingent upon diverse regional core and periphery contexts in this paper. In response to this debate, we have developed comprehensive measures of urban form attributes, encompassing compactness, size, complexity and contiguity. Both non-spatial and spatial models have been conducted to elucidate how these land use strategies affect carbon emissions, focusing on the county-level municipalities within the Yangtze River Delta in China. In general, compactness and complexity drive carbon emissions, while size and contiguity show carbon reduction effects. Our Geographically Weighted Regression model reveals spatially heterogeneous relationships between urban forms on carbon emissions. The kernel density analysis further sheds light on the ‘core-periphery’ distinctions related to regional economic, planning and administrative characteristics. These heterogeneous results suggest the importance of tailored urban form strategies for different regional contexts, adding nuanced insights into land-use efforts for carbon reductions and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Yushan & Xu, Yuanshuo, 2024. "Carbon reduction of urban form strategies: Regional heterogeneity in Yangtze River Delta, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:141:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724001078
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724001078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:141:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724001078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.