IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8837-d867693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Urban Flood Resilience: Insights from Scientometric and Systematic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Meiyan Gao

    (Yellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Zongmin Wang

    (Yellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Haibo Yang

    (Yellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

In recent decades, climate change is exacerbating meteorological disasters around the world, causing more serious urban flood disaster losses. Many solutions in related research have been proposed to enhance urban adaptation to climate change, including urban flooding simulations, risk reduction and urban flood-resistance capacity. In this paper we provide a thorough review of urban flood-resilience using scientometric and systematic analysis. Using Cite Space and VOS viewer, we conducted a scientometric analysis to quantitively analyze related papers from the Web of Science Core Collection from 1999 to 2021 with urban flood resilience as the keyword. We systematically summarize the relationship of urban flood resilience, including co-citation analysis of keywords, authors, research institutions, countries, and research trends. The scientometric results show that four stages can be distinguished to indicate the evolution of different keywords in urban flood management from 1999, and urban flood resilience has become a research hotspot with a significant increase globally since 2015. The research methods and progress of urban flood resilience in these four related fields are systematically analyzed, including climate change, urban planning, urban system adaptation and urban flood-simulation models. Climate change has been of high interest in urban flood-resilience research. Urban planning and the adaptation of urban systems differ in terms of human involvement and local policies, while more dynamic factors need to be jointly described. Models are mostly evaluated with indicators, and comprehensive resilience studies based on traditional models are needed for multi-level and higher performance models. Consequently, more studies about urban flood resilience based on local policies and dynamics within global urban areas combined with fine simulation are needed in the future, improving the concept of resilience as applied to urban flood-risk-management and assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiyan Gao & Zongmin Wang & Haibo Yang, 2022. "Review of Urban Flood Resilience: Insights from Scientometric and Systematic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8837-:d:867693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8837/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8837/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Cutter, 2016. "The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 741-758, January.
    2. Dandan Zhang & Juqin Shen & Pengfei Liu & Fuhua Sun, 2020. "Allocation of Flood Drainage Rights Based on the PSR Model and Pythagoras Fuzzy TOPSIS Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Zongmin Li & Shuyan Xu & Liming Yao, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Mining of Sponge City: Trends, Foci and Challenges Standing Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Gisela Wachinger & Ortwin Renn & Chloe Begg & Christian Kuhlicke, 2013. "The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(6), pages 1049-1065, June.
    5. Sunil Prashar & Rajib Shaw & Yukiko Takeuchi, 2012. "Assessing the resilience of Delhi to climate-related disasters: a comprehensive approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1609-1624, November.
    6. Meng Meng & Marcin Dabrowski & Dominic Stead, 2020. "Enhancing Flood Resilience and Climate Adaptation: The State of the Art and New Directions for Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Sandeep Kumar Sood & Keshav Singh Rawat, 2021. "A scientometric analysis of ICT-assisted disaster management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 2863-2881, April.
    8. Chaochao Li & Xiaotao Cheng & Na Li & Xiaohe Du & Qian Yu & Guangyuan Kan, 2016. "A Framework for Flood Risk Analysis and Benefit Assessment of Flood Control Measures in Urban Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Dandan Zhang & Juqin Shen & Pengfei Liu & Qian Zhang & Fuhua Sun, 2020. "Use of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Environmental Gini Coefficient for Allocation of Regional Flood Drainage Rights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Yijun Shi & Guofang Zhai & Shutian Zhou & Yuwen Lu & Wei Chen & Jinyang Deng, 2019. "How Can Cities Respond to Flood Disaster Risks under Multi-Scenario Simulation? A Case Study of Xiamen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Qi Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Liupeng Jiang & Xingpeng Liu & Zhijun Tong, 2014. "Flood Disaster Risk Assessment of Rural Housings — A Case Study of Kouqian Town in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Shang, Ce & Lin, Teng & Li, Canbing & Wang, Keyou & Ai, Qian, 2021. "Joining resilience and reliability evaluation against both weather and ageing causes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Huamei Shao & Gunwoo Kim & Qing Li & Galen Newman, 2021. "Web of Science-Based Green Infrastructure: A Bibliometric Analysis in CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Keyu Luo & Zhenyu Wang & Wei Sha & Jiansheng Wu & Hongliang Wang & Qingliang Zhu, 2021. "Integrating Sponge City Concept and Neural Network into Land Suitability Assessment: Evidence from a Satellite Town of Shenzhen Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Hui Li & Weishu Liu, 2020. "Same same but different: self-citations identified through Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2723-2732, September.
    16. Ayyoob Sharifi, 2020. "Urban Resilience Assessment: Mapping Knowledge Structure and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Zhihui Li & Keyu Song & Lu Peng, 2021. "Flood Risk Assessment under Land Use and Climate Change in Wuhan City of the Yangtze River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Ming Zhong & Kairong Lin & Guoping Tang & Qian Zhang & Yang Hong & Xiaohong Chen, 2020. "A Framework to Evaluate Community Resilience to Urban Floods: A Case Study in Three Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Beniamino Russo & Manuel Gómez Valentín & Jackson Tellez-Álvarez, 2021. "The Relevance of Grated Inlets within Surface Drainage Systems in the Field of Urban Flood Resilience. A Review of Several Experimental and Numerical Simulation Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heng Tang & Hanwei Xu & Xiaoping Rui & Xuebiao Heng & Ying Song, 2022. "The Identification and Analysis of the Centers of Geographical Public Opinions in Flood Disasters Based on Improved Naïve Bayes Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaowei Xu & Hao Fu & Jiashuai Yang & Lingyue Wang, 2022. "Assessment of the Relationship between Land Use and Flood Risk Based on a Coupled Hydrological–Hydraulic Model: A Case Study of Zhaojue River Basin in Southwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Qiaoyun Yang & Dan Yang & Peng Li & Shilu Liang & Zhenghu Zhang, 2021. "A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Global Community Resilience Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Lei Li & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Faith Ka Shun Chan & Christopher D. Ives, 2021. "Mapping the Research Landscape of Nature-Based Solutions in Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-41, April.
    4. Xiaoyan Zhang & Juqin Shen & Fuhua Sun & Shou Wang & Shuxuan Zhang & Jian Chen, 2022. "Allocation of Flood Drainage Rights in Watershed Using a Hybrid FBWM-Grey-TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of the Jiangsu Section of the Sunan Canal, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Sisira S. Withanachchi & Ilia Kunchulia & Giorgi Ghambashidze & Rami Al Sidawi & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2018. "Farmers’ Perception of Water Quality and Risks in the Mashavera River Basin, Georgia: Analyzing the Vulnerability of the Social-Ecological System through Community Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Jones, Lindsey & d'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Xiansheng Chen & Ruisong Quan, 2021. "A spatiotemporal analysis of urban resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Yangtze River Delta," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 829-854, March.
    9. Huang, Yi, 2021. "Salience of hazard disclosure and house prices: Evidence from Christchurch, New Zealand," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Philip Antwi-Agyei & Frank Baffour-Ata & Sarah Koomson & Nana Kwame Kyeretwie & Nana Barimah Nti & Afia Oforiwaa Owusu & Fukaiha Abdul Razak, 2023. "Drivers and coping mechanisms for floods: experiences of residents in urban Kumasi, Ghana," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 2477-2500, March.
    11. Jaekyoung Kim & Junsuk Kang, 2020. "Analysis of Flood Damage in the Seoul Metropolitan Government Using Climate Change Scenarios and Mitigation Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Mohammad Mojtahedi & Sidney Newton & Jason Meding, 2017. "Predicting the resilience of transport infrastructure to a natural disaster using Cox’s proportional hazards regression model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 1119-1133, January.
    13. Sullivan, Daniel & Schmitt, Harrison J. & Calloway, Eric E. & Clausen, Whitney & Tucker, Pamela & Rayman, Jamie & Gerhardstein, Ben, 2021. "Chronic environmental contamination: A narrative review of psychosocial health consequences, risk factors, and pathways to community resilience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Gisela Wachinger & Ortwin Renn & Sarah-Kristina Wist & Sinika-Marie Steinhilber & Ulrike Triemer, 2014. "Using participation to create resilience: how to involve citizens in designing a hospital system?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 208-223, June.
    15. Fang Zhang & Dengyu Wang & Xi Zhou & Fan Ye, 2024. "Community Resilience Evaluation and Construction Strategies in the Perspective of Public Health Emergencies: A Case Study of Six Communities in Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    16. Zobel, Christopher W. & Baghersad, Milad, 2020. "Analytically comparing disaster resilience across multiple dimensions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. H.M. Tuihedur Rahman & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "An Analytical Framework for Assessing Context-Specific Rural Livelihood Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.
    18. KASHIWAGI Yuzuka & TODO Yasuyuki, 2022. "Trade Disruption and Risk Perception," Discussion papers 22086, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    19. Meysam Amirsadat & Kooresh Omidipoor & Amir Bastaminia & Mohammad Mehdi Meshkinghalam, 2024. "Identifying and evaluating the dimensions and components affecting the resilience of flood-stricken communities: Konarak city," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(12), pages 10607-10634, September.
    20. Tianlong Yu & Hao Yang & Xiaowei Luo & Yifeng Jiang & Xiang Wu & Jingqi Gao, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8837-:d:867693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.