IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v131y2023ics0264837723002168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How have the land reform, misunderstanding, and dysfunction of modernity led to rural underdevelopment in Iran?

Author

Listed:
  • Jomoor, Erfan Rezapour
  • Rostami, Farahnaz
  • Geravandi, Shahpar

Abstract

Rural underdevelopment in Iran has triggered numerous theoretical standpoints and discussions. However, none of them are based on concrete scientific foundations and historical arguments. The literature contains little or no evidence to support or refute that rural underdevelopment in Iran has originated in modernity. Accordingly, the present historical study mainly aimed to explore the role of modernity in Iranian rural underdevelopment. So, around 500 secondary documents including books, articles, and journals published from 1906 to 2019 were reviewed and coded. The research team needed a general comprehension of the course of events, so the researchers adopted the systems thinking approach and dynamic systems method to fulfill the research objective, i.e., obtaining a general comprehension of the studied events. The investigation of the historical events in Iran showed that the misunderstanding of modernity in Iran led to dysfunction, which resulted in making inefficient decisions, such as land reform. This trend has continued until today and led to rural underdevelopment. Since the theory of modernization is still supported and applied in Iran, fundamental changes are needed in policymakers’ and government officials’ perceptions of modernity. This means a shift in the role of government in the implementation of modernity programs, including land reform, from a dominant and implementing agent to a supporting agent. This perspective can be more practical and efficient than making efforts to force changes. Executive officials can first focus on conceptual changes like changing social and cultural contexts towards modernization. Furthermore, this finding can explain the causes of the success and failure of modernization in rural areas of developing countries. Finally, the results can serve as a preliminary analysis for building a framework to give development theoreticians access to information about rural underdevelopment in Iran. Overall, the policy implications of the study could be far-reaching, not least because they may force planners to change their attitudes toward theoretical standpoints in Iranian rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jomoor, Erfan Rezapour & Rostami, Farahnaz & Geravandi, Shahpar, 2023. "How have the land reform, misunderstanding, and dysfunction of modernity led to rural underdevelopment in Iran?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:131:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723002168
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhattacharya, Prasad S. & Mitra, Devashish & Ulubaşoğlu, Mehmet A., 2019. "The political economy of land reform enactments: New cross-national evidence (1900–2010)," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 50-68.
    2. Ahmad Taher Azar, 2012. "System dynamics as a useful technique for complex systems," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 377-410.
    3. Kamyab Shahriari, 2017. "Modernization Process in Iran: Historical Overview," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 269-282, January.
    4. Alfred G Nhema & Tawanda Zinyama, 2016. "Modernization, Dependency and Structural Adjustment Development Theories and Africa: A Critical Appraisal," International Journal of Social Science Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 151-166, March.
    5. Ali Shakoori, 2019. "Rural Development in Iran: A Survey of Policies and Outcomes," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 35(3), pages 346-366, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shari, Babajide Epe & Dioha, Michael O. & Abraham-Dukuma, Magnus C. & Sobanke, Victor O. & Emodi, Nnaemeka V., 2022. "Clean cooking energy transition in Nigeria: Policy implications for Developing countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 319-343.
    2. Usman Ugboga Koku & Oduor Isaiah Otieno & Edward Kisiang’ani, 2022. "Theoretical Debate on the Development Aid in Africa," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(12), pages 520-528, December.
    3. Hossein Azadi & Eric Vanhaute, 2019. "Mutual Effects of Land Distribution and Economic Development: Evidence from Asia, Africa, and Latin America," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Albertus, Michael & Espinoza, Mauricio & Fort, Ricardo, 2020. "Land reform and human capital development: Evidence from Peru," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Vinaytosh Mishra & Mohita G. Sharma, 2020. "Understanding Humanitarian Supply Chain Through Causal Modelling," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 9(3), pages 317-329, December.
    6. Carlos M. Chang & Johanes Makahaube & Adeeba A. Raheem & Eric Smith & Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz, 2022. "Using System Dynamics Method to Measure Project Management Performance of Local Government Agencies," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Ali Akbar Barati & Milad Zhoolideh & Mostafa Moradi & Eydieh Sohrabi Mollayousef & Christine Fürst, 2022. "Multidimensional poverty and livelihood strategies in rural Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12963-12993, November.
    8. Coral, Claudia & Bokelmann, Wolfgang & Bonatti, Michelle & Carcamo, Robert & Sieber, Stefan, 2021. "Understanding institutional change mechanisms for land use: Lessons from Ecuador’s history," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Yigit Kazancoglu & Esra Ekinci & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Muruvvet Deniz Sezer & Yasanur Kayikci, 2021. "Performance evaluation of reverse logistics in food supply chains in a circular economy using system dynamics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 71-91, January.
    10. Sobratee-Fajurally, N. & Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe, 2022. "Inclusive sustainable landscape management in West and Central Africa: enabling co-designing contexts for systemic sensibility," IWMI Books, Reports H051652, International Water Management Institute.
    11. Zengqing Wu & Run Peng & Xu Han & Shuyuan Zheng & Yixin Zhang & Chuan Xiao, 2023. "Smart Agent-Based Modeling: On the Use of Large Language Models in Computer Simulations," Papers 2311.06330, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    12. Juan David Torres, 2022. "Shaping inequality? Property rights, landed elites and public lands in Colombia," Documentos CEDE 20514, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    13. Boberg-Fazlić, Nina & Lampe, Markus & Martinelli Lasheras, Pablo & Sharp, Paul, 2022. "Winners and losers from agrarian reform: Evidence from Danish land inequality 1682–1895," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Lin MA & Jiayu HU, 2018. "An Analysis of the Eco-Innovation Mechanism and Policies in the Pulp and Paper Industry Based on Coupled Game Theory and System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Moradi, Shohreh & Khan, Md Muzahid & Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne & Shamsuddoha, Mohammad & Gorod, Alex, 2023. "Modeling and assessing seismic resilience leveraging systems dynamic approach: A case study of society 5.0," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    16. Yong S. Nyam & Julius H. Kotir & Andries J. Jordaan & Abiodun A. Ogundeji & Adetoso A. Adetoro & Israel R. Orimoloye, 2020. "Towards Understanding and Sustaining Natural Resource Systems through the Systems Perspective: A Systematic Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Donghyun Choi & Yonghwi Noh & Jin Sung Rha, 2019. "Work pressure and burnout effects on emergency room operations: a system dynamics simulation approach," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(3), pages 433-456, September.
    18. Fan Yang & Guangqing Chi & Ge Wang & Shirui Tang & Yunting Li & Cong Ju, 2020. "Untangle the Complex Stakeholder Relationships in Rural Settlement Consolidation in China: A Social Network Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Casaburi, Lorenzo & Caprettini, Bruno & Venturini, Miriam, 2021. "Redistribution, Voting and Clientelism: Evidence from the Italian Land Reform," CEPR Discussion Papers 15679, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Bhattacharya, Prasad Sankar & Chowdhury, Prabal Roy & Rahman, Habibur, 2023. "Does credit availability mitigate domestic conflict?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:131:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.