IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v17y2009i2p327-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in Farm Management and Agricultural Activities and Their Effect on Farmers' Satisfaction from Land Consolidation: The Case of Bursa--Karacabey, Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • E. Yaslioglu
  • S. T. Akkaya Aslan
  • M. Kirmikil
  • K. S. Gundogdu
  • I. Arici

Abstract

In Turkey, the scattered, fragmented plots in agricultural areas are one of the major problems preventing agricultural efficiency. Land consolidation is an effective tool in improving efficiency, but the success depends greatly on farmers' satisfaction and adoption. Therefore, determination of issues important to farmers can positively influence future land consolidation projects. As such, land consolidation studies must be accelerated and extended nationwide in countries where land fragmentation is common and rural development is essential. This study determined the effects of changes in farm structures and agricultural activities on satisfaction with land consolidation. Nine villages in the Bursa--Karacabey (Turkey) plain irrigation area were selected as study sites, and the logit model was used to analyse survey data including 190 respondents. Our results indicate that farmers' age (AGE), easiness in crop pattern planning (CRPT), reduction in distance between farmstead centre and plots (DFCP), reduction in time consumed in accessing the plots (TIMES) and improvement in working conditions in the fields (WORC) significantly affected the satisfaction with land consolidation. All of these factors except farmers' age (AGE) are related to consolidation of scattered, fragmented and tiny parcels into larger plots with suitable shape and size for agriculture. Consolidation also increased production and further improved working conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Yaslioglu & S. T. Akkaya Aslan & M. Kirmikil & K. S. Gundogdu & I. Arici, 2009. "Changes in Farm Management and Agricultural Activities and Their Effect on Farmers' Satisfaction from Land Consolidation: The Case of Bursa--Karacabey, Turkey," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 327-340, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:17:y:2009:i:2:p:327-340
    DOI: 10.1080/09654310802553639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654310802553639
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654310802553639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miranowski, John & Shortle, J., 1986. "Effects of Risk Perceptions and Other Characteristics of Farmers and Farm Operations on the Adoption of Conservation Tillage Practices," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10703, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bahar, Sevgi Kesici & Kirmikil, Müge, 2021. "The evaluation of agricultural landowner inputs before and after land consolidation: The Kesik Village example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Akkaya Aslan, Serife Tulin & Kirmikil, Muge & Gündoğdu, Kemal Sulhi & Arici, Ismet, 2018. "Reallocation model for land consolidation based on landowners’ requests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 463-470.
    3. Żanna Stręk & Przemysław Leń & Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Paweł Postek & Monika Mika & Leszek Dawid, 2021. "A Proposed Land Exchange Algorithm for Eliminating the External Plot Patchwork," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Michał Maciąg & Klaudia Maciąg & Przemysław Leń, 2024. "Algorithm for Evaluating the Difficulty of Land Consolidation Using Cadastral Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Akkaya Aslan, Şerife Tülin, 2021. "Evaluation of land consolidation projects with parcel shape and dispersion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    6. Khadka, Saaruj & Gyawali, Buddhi R. & Shrestha, Tilak B. & Cristan, Richard & Banerjee, Swagata “Ban” & Antonious, George & Poudel, Hari P., 2021. "Exploring relationships among landownership, landscape diversity, and ecological productivity in Kentucky," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Janus, Jarosław & Ertunç, Ela, 2021. "Differences in the effectiveness of land consolidation projects in various countries and their causes: Examples of Poland and Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Colombo, Sergio & Perujo-Villanueva, Manuel, 2019. "A practical method for the ex-ante evaluation of land consolidation initiatives: Fully connected parcels with the same value," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 463-471.
    9. Mika, Monika & Leń, Przemysław & Oleniacz, Grzegorz & Kurowska, Krystyna, 2019. "Study of the effects of applying a new algorithm for the comprehensive programming of the hierarchization of land consolidation and exchange works in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Keqiang Wang & Jianglin Lu & Hongmei Liu, 2023. "How Does Spatial Injustice Affect Residents’ Policy Acceptance of the Economic–Social–Ecological Objectives of Construction Land Reduction?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Joseph Chisasa, 2016. "Determinants of the demand for credit by smallholder farmers: survey results from South Africa," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 26-46.
    12. Yishao Shi & Xiangyang Cao & Dongmei Fu & Yuncai Wang, 2018. "Comprehensive Value Discovery of Land Consolidation Projects: An Empirical Analysis of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Pengnan Xiao & Chong Zhao & Yong Zhou & Haoyu Feng & Xigui Li & Jinhui Jiang, 2021. "Study on Land Consolidation Zoning in Hubei Province Based on the Coupling of Neural Network and Cluster Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheikh, A. D. & Rehman, T. & Yates, C. M., 2003. "Logit models for identifying the factors that influence the uptake of new `no-tillage' technologies by farmers in the rice-wheat and the cotton-wheat farming systems of Pakistan's Punjab," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 79-95, January.
    2. Marita Laukkanen & Céline Nauges, 2011. "Environmental and Production Cost Impacts of No-till in Finland: Estimates from Observed Behavior," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(3), pages 508-527.
    3. Knowler, Duncan & Bradshaw, Ben, 2007. "Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-48, February.
    4. Bockstael, N. & Costanza, R. & Strand, I. & Boynton, W. & Bell, K. & Wainger, L., 1995. "Ecological economic modeling and valuation of ecosystems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 143-159, August.
    5. Marita Laukkanen & NAUGES Céline, 2009. "Environmental and production cost impacts of no-till: estimates from observed behavior," LERNA Working Papers 09.28.304, LERNA, University of Toulouse.
    6. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Miranowski, John A. & Morehart, Mitchell J, 1989. "Investments in Soil Conservation and Land Improvements: Factors Explaining Farmers' Decisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 308064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Mazvimavi, Kizito & Twomlow, Steve, 2009. "Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 20-29, June.
    8. Liu, Pengfei & Wang, Yu & Zhang, Wei, 2018. "The Influence of Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) on Local Water Quality: Evidence from Monitoring Station Level Data," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274311, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Maggio, Giuseppe & Sitko, Nicholas, 2019. "Knowing is half the battle: Seasonal forecasts, adaptive cropping systems, and the mediating role of private markets in Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. repec:ags:aaea22:335650 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Qingfeng Han & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Fengmin Li, 2018. "Adoption of Conservation Tillage on the Semi-Arid Loess Plateau of Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Kidane Mariam Gebregziabher, 2014. "Agricultural Extension Service and Input Application Intensity: Evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(9), pages 735-747.
    13. Gautam, Tej K. & Bhatta, Dependra, 2017. "Determinants Of Irrigation Technology Adoptions And Production Efficiency In Nepal’S Agricultural Sector," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252856, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Jing Ren & Fuduo Li & Changbin Yin & Jiudong Zhang, 2022. "Uncovering the Deviation of Farmers’ Green Manure Planting Willingness and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:17:y:2009:i:2:p:327-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.