IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v107y2021ics0264837721002040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cooperative urban land development model in Germany - An effective instrument to support affordable housing

Author

Listed:
  • Koetter, Theo
  • Sikder, Sujit Kumar
  • Weiss, Dominik

Abstract

Several international studies have already mentioned various policy instruments to promote the sociallymixed housing policy that supports many cities to achieve inclusionary housing goals. One of the greatest challenges facing cities in Germany is the current housing shortage, especially of affordable housing and the provision of adequate social infrastructure. The main causes are the strong influx into the cities and the rapidly rising land prices. To solve these problems several German cities have developed and established cooperative urban land development (CULD) models. This study aims to review inclusionary housing policy and present a firm introduction on a land development policy instrument CULD that supports among other targets the creation of affordable housing in Germany. It includes a description of this model that has social, economic and planning goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Koetter, Theo & Sikder, Sujit Kumar & Weiss, Dominik, 2021. "The cooperative urban land development model in Germany - An effective instrument to support affordable housing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:107:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721002040
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721002040
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruys, P.H.M. & Bruil, J. & Dix, H.G., 2007. "Modes of Governance in the Dutch Social Housing Sector," Other publications TiSEM d52b3f92-e179-4d1c-9567-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Nathan Marom & Naomi Carmon, 2015. "Affordable Housing Plans in London and New York: Between Marketplace and Social Mix," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 993-1015, October.
    3. Andrew R. Watkins, 1999. "Impacts of Land Development Charges," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 75(3), pages 415-424.
    4. Pieter H.M. RUYS & Jan BRUIL & Henry DIX, 2007. "Modes Of Governance In The Dutch Social Housing Sector," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(3), pages 381-413, September.
    5. Kenneth Gibb, 2011. "Delivering new affordable housing in the age of austerity: housing policy in Scotland," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(4), pages 357-368, October.
    6. Luisa Ingaramo & Stefania Sabatino, 2011. "Social housing: new demand, new tools," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(4), pages 369-393, October.
    7. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. de Vries, 2019. "Expropriation of Real Property in Kigali City: Scoping the Patterns of Spatial Justice," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Vivienne Milligan & Simon Pinnegar, 2010. "The Comeback of National Housing Policy in Australia: First Reflections," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 325-344.
    9. Turnbull, Geoffrey K., 2004. "Urban growth controls: transitional dynamics of development fees and growth boundaries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 215-237, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueping Cong & Xueming Li & Yilu Gong, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Sustainable Development of Urban Human Settlements in China for SDGs," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Tsai, I-Chun & Wang, Wen-Kai, 2022. "The value of land redevelopment in different types of properties: Considering the effect of hold-out problems on the development probability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Sikder, Sujit Kumar & Nagarajan, Magesh & Mustafee, Navonil, 2023. "Augmenting EV charging infrastructure towards transformative sustainable cities: An equity-based approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Zhou, Di & Hu, Yanning & Xie, Dongchun & Sun, Qiong, 2023. "Land resource mismatch and energy efficiency: Evidence from 243 cities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mireille Mizero & Aristide Maniriho & Bosco Bashangwa Mpozi & Antoine Karangwa & Philippe Burny & Philippe Lebailly, 2021. "Rwanda’s Land Policy Reform: Self-Employment Perspectives from a Case Study of Kimonyi Sector," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Shakirah Esmail Hudani, 2020. "The Green Masterplan: Crisis, State Transition and Urban Transformation in Post‐Genocide Rwanda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 673-690, July.
    3. Alasdair Reid, 2023. "Closing the Affordable Housing Gap: Identifying the Barriers Hindering the Sustainable Design and Construction of Affordable Homes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Rachel Friedman & Gillad Rosen, 2020. "The face of affordable housing in a neoliberal paradigm," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 959-975, April.
    5. J. Peter Clinch & Eoin O'Neill, 2010. "Assessing the Relative Merits of Development Charges and Transferable Development Rights in an Uncertain World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 891-911, April.
    6. Admasu, Wubante Fetene & Van Passel, Steven & Minale, Amare Sewnet & Tsegaye, Enyew Adgo & Azadi, Hossein & Nyssen, Jan, 2019. "Take out the farmer: An economic assessment of land expropriation for urban expansion in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Alice Nikuze & Richard Sliuzas & Johannes Flacke, 2020. "From Closed to Claimed Spaces for Participation: Contestation in Urban Redevelopment Induced-Displacements and Resettlement in Kigali, Rwanda," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Quigley, John M. & Swoboda, Aaron M., 2007. "The urban impacts of the Endangered Species Act: A general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 299-318, March.
    9. Anna Granath Hansson, 2017. "Boosting affordable housing supply: Could type approval of serially produced housing be a piece in the puzzle? [Erhöhung des Angebots an erschwinglichem Wohnraum: Könnte die Typengenehmigung des se," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 3(1), pages 49-68, April.
    10. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. de Vries, 2020. "Can In-Kind Compensation for Expropriated Real Property Promote Spatial Justice? A Case Study Analysis of Resettlement in Kigali City, Rwanda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-34, May.
    11. Martin, Chris & Lawson, Julie & Milligan, Vivienne & Hartley, Chris & Pawson, Hal & Dodson, Jago, 2023. "Towards an Australian Housing and Homelessness Strategy: understanding national approaches in contemporary policy," SocArXiv h5tja, Center for Open Science.
    12. Burge, Gregory & Ihlanfeldt, Keith, 2006. "Impact fees and single-family home construction," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 284-306, September.
    13. John Anderson, 2005. "Taxes and Fees as Forms of Land Use Regulation," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 413-427, December.
    14. Alexander Lord & Yiquan Gu, 2019. "Can the market be tamed? A thought experiment on the value(s) of planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 11-24, February.
    15. Jyh-Bang Jou, 2014. "Determinants of Efficient Growth Boundaries with Balanced Budgets and Stochastic Rents," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 93-111, March.
    16. Burge, Gregory, 2014. "The capitalization effects of school, residential, and commercial impact fees on undeveloped land values," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-13.
    17. Villegas, Laura, 2019. "Integrating Econometric Models of Land Use Change with Models of Ecosystem Services and Landscape Simulations to Guide Coastal Management and Planning for Flood Control," EfD Discussion Paper 19-13, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    18. Quigley, John M. & Swoboda, Aaron, 2006. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of Land Use Restrictions and Residential Welfare," Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy, Working Paper Series qt11k4p0vt, Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy.
    19. Yingtao Wu & Maogang Tang & Zhonghao Zhang & Baijun Wu, 2019. "Whether Urban Development and Ecological Protection Can Achieve a Win-Win Situation—The Nonlinear Relationship between Urbanization and Ecosystem Service Value in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Chu, Zhen & Cheng, Mingwang & Yu, Ning Neil, 2021. "A smart city is a less polluted city," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:107:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721002040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.