IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v31y2016i6p651-671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approaches to workforce housing in London and Chicago: from targeted sectors to income-based eligibility

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Lazarovic
  • David Paton
  • Lisa Bornstein

Abstract

In many cities, people with jobs essential to daily urban life—bus drivers, teachers, police, nurses and the like—cannot afford housing in proximity to their work. Municipal efforts to counter such job--housing imbalances include targeting such workers specifically or moderate-income households, more broadly, for housing support. This article investigates and assesses housing policy for modest-income workers in two cities, Chicago and London. Based on review of documents and key informant interviews, each city’s policy context, aims, means and outcomes are analyzed. Effective strategies include working with public, private and third-sector partners to find upstream cost-effective solutions, increasing shared equity/ownership products and developing mechanisms to ensure long-term affordability of workforce housing. While each city’s policies reflect local conditions, they also are indicative of broad trends in intermediate housing policy: an increase in stakeholders involved in programme administration and delivery, a continued focus on homeownership, rising income thresholds for eligibility and a shift away from targeting employment sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Lazarovic & David Paton & Lisa Bornstein, 2016. "Approaches to workforce housing in London and Chicago: from targeted sectors to income-based eligibility," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 651-671, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:31:y:2016:i:6:p:651-671
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1121214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2015.1121214
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2015.1121214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathan Marom & Naomi Carmon, 2015. "Affordable Housing Plans in London and New York: Between Marketplace and Social Mix," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 993-1015, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel Friedman & Gillad Rosen, 2020. "The face of affordable housing in a neoliberal paradigm," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 959-975, April.
    2. Alexander Lord & Yiquan Gu, 2019. "Can the market be tamed? A thought experiment on the value(s) of planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 11-24, February.
    3. Antoine Paccoud & Markus Hesse & Tom Becker & Magdalena Górczyńska, 2022. "Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1782-1799, October.
    4. Theresa Katharina Kotulla, 2017. "Request and Potential for Social Housing Projects in Germany, by the example of the Federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia," ERES eres2017_56, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    5. Koetter, Theo & Sikder, Sujit Kumar & Weiss, Dominik, 2021. "The cooperative urban land development model in Germany - An effective instrument to support affordable housing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:31:y:2016:i:6:p:651-671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.