IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v102y2021ics0264837720326132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reexamine China’s terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance under land use-type and climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jiasheng
  • Guo, Xiaomin
  • Chuai, Xiaowei
  • Xie, Fangjian
  • Yang, Feng
  • Gao, Runyi
  • Ji, Xuepeng

Abstract

Land use and climate change can strongly affect the terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance. However, there is a lack of clarity for existing studies that investigate total carbon balance for China’s terrestrial carbon balance (carbon storage and Net Ecosystem Productivity (NEP)). In this study, based on large data and the improved NEP model, we examined land use and climate change during 2000–2015 in China, calculated terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage change caused by land use change, and carbon sink/source variation under climate change; we found that during 2000–2015, 3.05 % of China’s land area had land use type changes and caused 32.97 Tg of carbon storage loss, consisting of 10.4 Tg from vegetation carbon storage and 22.57 Tg from soil organic carbon (SOC) loss. Built-up land occupying ecological land was the most obvious land transfer type, especially for grassland degeneration. Both temperature and precipitation showed decreasing trends throughout China. Mean annual NEP showed a carbon sink value of 41.73 g C.m−2.yr−1, and the NEPs of carbon sinks were mostly distributed in South and Midland China and partly in Northeast China. There were obvious regional differences and the carbon balance showed that North China and Northwest China were regions of net carbon sources. The other four regions were net carbon sinks. Land use changes caused carbon storage loss in all regions, NEPs in North China and Northwest China were carbon sources, while in the other regions were carbon sinks. All NEPs exhibited an increasing trend during 2000–2015, except for Mid-South China. Finally, according to regional carbon balance characters, different policy implications were drawn which can serve for the formulation of territorial spatial planning. Land exploitation should be limited and environmental conservation is needed in North and Northwest China. The temperature in Southwest China has been increasing continuously and merits attention. The control of built-up land expansion in other regions should be strengthened.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jiasheng & Guo, Xiaomin & Chuai, Xiaowei & Xie, Fangjian & Yang, Feng & Gao, Runyi & Ji, Xuepeng, 2021. "Reexamine China’s terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance under land use-type and climate change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720326132
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720326132
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fei Ji & Zhaohua Wu & Jianping Huang & Eric P. Chassignet, 2014. "Evolution of land surface air temperature trend," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 462-466, June.
    2. Tang, Ling & Wu, Jiaqian & Yu, Lean & Bao, Qin, 2015. "Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: A multi-agent-based model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 152-169.
    3. Ben Bond-Lamberty & Allison Thomson, 2010. "Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7288), pages 579-582, March.
    4. Huang, Lin & Liu, Jiyuan & Shao, Quanqin & Xu, Xinliang, 2012. "Carbon sequestration by forestation across China: Past, present, and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1291-1299.
    5. Zhou, Decheng & Zhao, Shuqing & Liu, Shuguang & Zhang, Liangxia, 2014. "Modeling the effects of the Sloping Land Conversion Program on terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics in the Loess Plateau: A case study with Ansai County, Shaanxi province, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 47-54.
    6. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    7. Xin Nie & Qian Chen & Ting Xiao & Han Wang, 2019. "Willingness to pay for ecological function regions protection based on a choice experiment method: a case study of the Shiwandashan nature reserve," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 813-829, March.
    8. Jiqun Wen & Xiaowei Chuai & Shanchi Li & Song Song & Jiasheng Li & Xiaomin Guo & Lei Yang, 2018. "Spatial-Temporal Changes of Soil Respiration across China and the Response to Land Cover and Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Jianping Huang & Haipeng Yu & Xiaodan Guan & Guoyin Wang & Ruixia Guo, 2016. "Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 166-171, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue Han & Xiaosan Ge, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors on Carbon Emissions from Land Use in Suzhou, the World’s Largest Industrial City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Hui Wen & Yi Li & Zirong Li & Xiaoxue Cai & Fengxia Wang, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation of Carbon Budgets and Carbon Balance Zoning in China Based on the Land Use Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Qing Liu & Dongdong Yang & Lei Cao & Bruce Anderson, 2022. "Assessment and Prediction of Carbon Storage Based on Land Use/Land Cover Dynamics in the Tropics: A Case Study of Hainan Island, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Wenyi Qiao & Weihua Guan & Xianjin Huang, 2021. "Assessing the Potential Impact of Land Use on Carbon Storage Driven by Economic Growth: A Case Study in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Yuxin Fan & Fang Wei, 2022. "Contributions of Natural Carbon Sink Capacity and Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Net-Zero Carbon Cities: A Case Study of Hangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Yang Zhang & Nazhalati Naerkezi & Yun Zhang & Bo Wang, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Land Use/Cover Change and Its Impact on Carbon Storage Based on the Coupled GMOP-PLUS-InVEST Model in the Hexi Corridor, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Lihan Cui & Wenwen Tang & Sheng Zheng & Ramesh P. Singh, 2022. "Ecological Protection Alone Is Not Enough to Conserve Ecosystem Carbon Storage: Evidence from Guangdong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Yanbo, Qu & Shilei, Wang & Yaya, Tian & Guanghui, Jiang & Tao, Zhou & Liang, Meng, 2023. "Territorial spatial planning for regional high-quality development – An analytical framework for the identification, mediation and transmission of potential land utilization conflicts in the Yellow Ri," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Shuxuan Xing & Shengfu Yang & Haonan Sun & Yi Wang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes of Terrestrial Carbon Storage in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas and Their Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Shouyi Ding & Shumi Liu & Mingxin Chang & Hanwei Lin & Tianyu Lv & Yujing Zhang & Chen Zeng, 2023. "Spatial Optimization of Land Use Pattern toward Carbon Mitigation Targets—A Study in Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhaoxia Ye & Aihong Fu & Shuhua Zhang & Yuhai Yang, 2020. "Suitable Scale of an Oasis in Different Scenarios in an Arid Region of China: A Case Study of the Ejina Oasis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Tang, Kai & Hailu, Atakelty, 2020. "Smallholder farms’ adaptation to the impacts of climate change: Evidence from China’s Loess Plateau," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Zhang, Pengyan & Yang, Dan & Qin, Mingzhou & Jing, Wenlong, 2020. "Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2022. "Residents’ Selection Behavior of Compensation Schemes for Construction Land Reduction: Empirical Evidence from Questionnaires in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Lü, Da & Gao, Guangyao & Lü, Yihe & Xiao, Feiyan & Fu, Bojie, 2020. "Detailed land use transition quantification matters for smart land management in drylands: An in-depth analysis in Northwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Yang, Yuanyuan & Bao, Wenkai & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Zhang, Hui & Cao, Libin & Zhang, Bing, 2017. "Emissions trading and technology adoption: An adaptive agent-based analysis of thermal power plants in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 23-32.
    8. Weijia Chen & Yongquan Lu & Guilin Liu, 2022. "Balancing cropland gain and desert vegetation loss: The key to rural revitalization in Xinjiang, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1122-1145, September.
    9. Wang, Bo & Li, Fan & Feng, Shuyi & Shen, Tong, 2020. "Transfer of development rights, farmland preservation, and economic growth: a case study of Chongqing’s land quotas trading program," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Xu, Tingting & Gao, Jay & Li, Yuhua, 2019. "Machine learning-assisted evaluation of land use policies and plans in a rapidly urbanizing district in Chongqing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Yin, Xu & Wang, Jing & Li, Yurui & Feng, Zhiming & Wang, Qianyi, 2021. "Are small towns really inefficient? A data envelopment analysis of sampled towns in Jiangsu province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Lili Guo & Yuting Song & Mengqian Tang & Jinyang Tang & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Mengying Su & Houjian Li, 2022. "Assessing the Relationship among Land Transfer, Fertilizer Usage, and PM 2.5 Pollution: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Ju-Hee Kim & Younggew Kim & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2021. "Using a choice experiment to explore the public willingness to pay for the impacts of improving energy efficiency of an apartment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1775-1793, October.
    15. Zhao, Xin-gang & Wu, Lei & Li, Ang, 2017. "Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Agnė Buivydienė & Irena Deveikytė & Agnė Veršulienė & Virginijus Feiza, 2024. "The Influence of Cropping Systems and Tillage Intensity on Soil CO 2 Exchange Rate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Xia, Min & Zhang, Yanyuan & Zhang, Zihong & Liu, Jingjie & Ou, Weixin & Zou, Wei, 2020. "Modeling agricultural land use change in a rapid urbanizing town: Linking the decisions of government, peasant households and enterprises," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Tang, Ling & Wu, Jiaqian & Yu, Lean & Bao, Qin, 2017. "Carbon allowance auction design of China's emissions trading scheme: A multi-agent-based approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 30-40.
    19. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Ma, Shuai & Wang, Liang-Jie & Chu, Lei & Jiang, Jiang, 2023. "Determination of ecological restoration patterns based on water security and food security in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720326132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.