IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v96y2024ics0301420724005609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining reported company commitments to water stewardship: Working beyond the mine?

Author

Listed:
  • Robertson, Jacqui
  • Côte, Claire
  • Stevens, Shona

Abstract

Mining company commitments to ‘water stewardship’ are a relatively recent development to address corporate water issues. The peak mining industry body, the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), has incorporated commitments to water stewardship in its established framework for members. The ICMM requires members to ‘implement water stewardship practices that provide for strong and transparent water governance’ (ICMM, 2023c, principle 6.2). The purpose of this paper is to explore the scope of corporate water stewardship activities that mining companies report and reflect on the role of mining companies in this context. This research has implications for mining companies in respect of appropriate corporate water stewardship activities. Broad findings of this study are that while ICMM members appear to embrace details around operational water management, reporting of off-tenure activity relating to collaboration and ‘providing water governance’ is more complex. This study finds that requiring companies to ‘provide water governance’ beyond the mine would seem to be problematic, in that not all companies actively demonstrate this, and it is somewhat at odds with the generally accepted role of government agencies in water governance. We recommend that the ICMM commitment to ‘provide strong and transparent water governance’ could be improved by rewording the commitment to be instead to ‘contribute to strong and transparent water governance’, or alternatively, for ICMM members to provide ‘strong and transparent internal water governance’.

Suggested Citation

  • Robertson, Jacqui & Côte, Claire & Stevens, Shona, 2024. "Examining reported company commitments to water stewardship: Working beyond the mine?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:96:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724005609
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724005609
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:96:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724005609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.