IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v77y2022ics0301420722001416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of machine learning applications for underground mine planning and scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Chimunhu, Prosper
  • Topal, Erkan
  • Ajak, Ajak Duany
  • Asad, Waqar

Abstract

Production planning and scheduling optimisation for underground mining operations has continued to attract significant attention over the last decades. This has been necessitated by the growing need for operations to meet their shareholder's expectations sustainably under increasingly challenging operational dynamics. Several studies have been undertaken to utilise mathematical programming models such as mixed-integer programming, heuristics and simulation algorithms including combinations of these techniques for production scheduling optimisation with some notable achievements noted in extant literature. However, the limited reach of standalone mathematical optimisation models under increasing volumes of input data spurred by the booming information technology (IT) platforms has become more apparent and pertinent for increased scholarly attention. The growing emergence of big data, driven by the industrial digitisation and automation has seen an increased appetite for data-driven optimisation planning and scheduling largely in manufacturing and operations management. However, the scarcity of discussion in this novel and fast-evolving area in the underground mining space presents a glaring blind spot that appeals for thoughtful conversations to narrow that gap. This paper seeks to discuss opportunities for application of data analytics and machine learning to improve production planning and scheduling efficacy in underground mining. Specific focus will then be narrowed to opportunities for incorporating predictive analytics and machine learning to improve the accuracy of mathematical optimisation models. The overarching intent is to support the attainment of mineral production targets through enabling schedule dynamic response to variability in key determinant variables such as ore grade and tonnages.

Suggested Citation

  • Chimunhu, Prosper & Topal, Erkan & Ajak, Ajak Duany & Asad, Waqar, 2022. "A review of machine learning applications for underground mine planning and scheduling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:77:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722001416
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722001416
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Matthew Carlyle & B. Curtis Eaves, 2001. "Underground Planning at Stillwater Mining Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 50-60, August.
    2. Józefowska, J. & Zimniak, A., 2008. "Optimization tool for short-term production planning and scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 109-120, March.
    3. Xingdong Zhao & Jia’an Niu, 2020. "Method of Predicting Ore Dilution Based on a Neural Network and Its Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Sunil D. Patil & Abhishek Mitra & Krishnaveni Tuggali Katarikonda & Jan-Douwe Wansink, 2021. "Predictive asset availability optimization for underground trucks and loaders in the mining industry," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(3), pages 751-772, September.
    5. Mark Kuchta & Alexandra Newman & Erkan Topal, 2004. "Implementing a Production Schedule at LKAB's Kiruna Mine," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 124-134, April.
    6. Marco Schulze & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2017. "Staff and machine shift scheduling in a German potash mine," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 635-656, December.
    7. Tsan‐Ming Choi & Stein W. Wallace & Yulan Wang, 2018. "Big Data Analytics in Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(10), pages 1868-1883, October.
    8. Luis Montiel & Roussos Dimitrakopoulos, 2017. "A heuristic approach for the stochastic optimization of mine production schedules," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 397-415, October.
    9. O’Sullivan, Dónal & Newman, Alexandra, 2015. "Optimization-based heuristics for underground mine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 248-259.
    10. Ajak, Ajak Duany & Lilford, Eric & Topal, Erkan, 2018. "Application of predictive data mining to create mine plan flexibility in the face of geological uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 62-79.
    11. Zhen Song & Håkan Schunnesson & Mikael Rinne & John Sturgul, 2015. "Intelligent Scheduling for Underground Mobile Mining Equipment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Sotoudeh, Farzad & Nehring, Micah & Kizil, Mehmet & Knights, Peter & Mousavi, Amin, 2020. "Production scheduling optimisation for sublevel stoping mines using mathematical programming: A review of literature and future directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Chongchong Qi & Andy Fourie & Xuhao Du & Xiaolin Tang, 2018. "Prediction of open stope hangingwall stability using random forests," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(2), pages 1179-1197, June.
    14. Nesbitt, Peter & Blake, Lewis R. & Lamas, Patricio & Goycoolea, Marcos & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo K. & Newman, Alexandra & Brickey, Andrea, 2021. "Underground mine scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 340-352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siyu Tu & Mingtao Jia & Liguan Wang & Shuzhao Feng & Shuang Huang, 2023. "A Dynamic Scheduling Model for Underground Metal Mines under Equipment Failure Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Nikodem Szlązak & Marek Korzec, 2022. "The Solution of the Main Fan Station for Underground Mines Being Decommissioned in Terms of Reducing Energy Consumption by Ventilation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Furtado e Faria, Matheus & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos & Lopes Pinto, Cláudio Lúcio, 2022. "Integrated stochastic optimization of stope design and long-term underground mine production scheduling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Younes Aalian & Michel Gamache & Gilles Pesant, 2024. "Short-term underground mine planning with uncertain activity durations using constraint programming," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 423-439, October.
    3. King, Barry & Goycoolea, Marcos & Newman, A., 2017. "Optimizing the open pit-to-underground mining transition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 297-309.
    4. Del Castillo, M. Fernanda & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2019. "Dynamically optimizing the strategic plan of mining complexes under supply uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 83-93.
    5. Chung, Joyce & Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali & Topal, Erkan, 2022. "Timing of transition from open-pit to underground mining: A simultaneous optimisation model for open-pit and underground mine production schedules," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Ghorbani, Yousef & Nwaila, Glen T. & Zhang, Steven E. & Bourdeau, Julie E. & Cánovas, Manuel & Arzua, Javier & Nikadat, Nooraddin, 2023. "Moving towards deep underground mineral resources: Drivers, challenges and potential solutions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Siyu Tu & Mingtao Jia & Liguan Wang & Shuzhao Feng & Shuang Huang, 2022. "A Multi-Equipment Task Assignment Model for the Horizontal Stripe Pre-Cut Mining Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Yifei Zhao & Jianhong Chen & Shan Yang & Yi Chen, 2022. "Mining Plan Optimization of Multi-Metal Underground Mine Based on Adaptive Hybrid Mutation PSO Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Emilia Vann Yaroson & Soumyadeb Chowdhury & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Prasanta Kumar Dey, 2024. "Unearthing the interplay between organisational resources, knowledge and industry 4.0 analytical decision support tools to achieve sustainability and supply chain wellbeing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1321-1368, November.
    10. Liu, Weihua & George Shanthikumar, J. & Tae-Woo Lee, Paul & Li, Xiang & Zhou, Li, 2021. "Special issue editorial: Smart supply chains and intelligent logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Rafael Epstein & Marcel Goic & Andrés Weintraub & Jaime Catalán & Pablo Santibáñez & Rodolfo Urrutia & Raúl Cancino & Sergio Gaete & Augusto Aguayo & Felipe Caro, 2012. "Optimizing Long-Term Production Plans in Underground and Open-Pit Copper Mines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 4-17, February.
    12. Zongguo Zhang & Xianyang Qiu & Xiuzhi Shi & Zhi Yu, 2023. "Chamber roof deformation prediction and analysis of underground mining using experimental design methodologies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 757-777, January.
    13. Friedrich-Wilhelm Wellmer & Roland W. Scholz, 2018. "What Is the Optimal and Sustainable Lifetime of a Mine?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    15. Davies, Jennifer & Sharifi, Hossein & Lyons, Andrew & Forster, Rick & Elsayed, Omar Khaled Shokry Mohamed, 2024. "Non-fungible tokens: The missing ingredient for sustainable supply chains in the metaverse age?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Suyuan Luo & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2024. "Great partners: how deep learning and blockchain help improve business operations together," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 53-78, August.
    18. Lei Wang & Ram Gopal & Ramesh Shankar & Joseph Pancras, 2022. "Forecasting venue popularity on location‐based services using interpretable machine learning," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2773-2788, July.
    19. Suyuan Luo & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "E‐commerce supply chains with considerations of cyber‐security: Should governments play a role?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2107-2126, May.
    20. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:77:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722001416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.