IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7306-d1134662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Scheduling Model for Underground Metal Mines under Equipment Failure Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Tu

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Mingtao Jia

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Liguan Wang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Shuzhao Feng

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Shuang Huang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

Equipment failure is a common problem in mining operations, resulting in significant delays and reductions in production efficiency. To address this problem, this paper proposes a dynamic scheduling model for underground metal mines under equipment failure conditions. The model aims to minimize the impact of equipment failures on production operations while avoiding extensive equipment changes. A case study of the southeastern mining area of the Chambishi Copper Mine is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model. The initial plan was generated using the multi-equipment task assignment model for the horizontal stripe pre-cut mining method. After equipment breakdown, the proposed model was used to reschedule the initial plan. Then, a comparative analysis was carried out. The results show that the proposed model effectively reduces the impact of equipment failures on production operations and improves overall mining execution at a low management cost. In general, the proposed model can assist schedulers in allocating equipment, coping with the disturbing effects of equipment failure, and improving mine production efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Tu & Mingtao Jia & Liguan Wang & Shuzhao Feng & Shuang Huang, 2023. "A Dynamic Scheduling Model for Underground Metal Mines under Equipment Failure Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7306-:d:1134662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7306/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7306/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhen Song & Håkan Schunnesson & Mikael Rinne & John Sturgul, 2015. "Intelligent Scheduling for Underground Mobile Mining Equipment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Marco Schulze & Julia Rieck & Cinna Seifi & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2016. "Machine scheduling in underground mining: an application in the potash industry," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(2), pages 365-403, March.
    3. Prerita Odeyar & Derek B. Apel & Robert Hall & Brett Zon & Krzysztof Skrzypkowski, 2022. "A Review of Reliability and Fault Analysis Methods for Heavy Equipment and Their Components Used in Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Chimunhu, Prosper & Topal, Erkan & Ajak, Ajak Duany & Asad, Waqar, 2022. "A review of machine learning applications for underground mine planning and scheduling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Younes Aalian & Michel Gamache & Gilles Pesant, 2024. "Short-term underground mine planning with uncertain activity durations using constraint programming," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 423-439, October.
    2. Jianxin Fang & Brenda Cheang & Andrew Lim, 2023. "Problems and Solution Methods of Machine Scheduling in Semiconductor Manufacturing Operations: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-44, August.
    3. Mathieu Payette & Georges Abdul-Nour, 2023. "Machine Learning Applications for Reliability Engineering: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Jie Hou & Guoqing Li & Lianyun Chen & Hao Wang & Nailian Hu, 2022. "Optimization of Truck–Loader Matching Based on a Simulation Method for Underground Mines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Kartick Bhushan & Somnath Chattopadhyaya & Shubham Sharma & Kamal Sharma & Changhe Li & Yanbin Zhang & Elsayed Mohamed Tag Eldin, 2022. "Analyzing Reliability and Maintainability of Crawler Dozer BD155 Transmission Failure Using Markov Method and Total Productive Maintenance: A Novel Case Study for Improvement Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Jacek Paś, 2023. "Issues Related to Power Supply Reliability in Integrated Electronic Security Systems Operated in Buildings and Vast Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Mohammad Alhusban & Mohannad Alhusban & Ayah A. Alkhawaldeh, 2023. "The Efficiency of Using Machine Learning Techniques in Fiber-Reinforced-Polymer Applications in Structural Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-32, December.
    8. Dayo-Olupona, Oluwatobi & Genc, Bekir & Celik, Turgay & Bada, Samson, 2023. "Adoptable approaches to predictive maintenance in mining industry: An overview," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    9. Fan Yang & Roel Leus, 2021. "Scheduling hybrid flow shops with time windows," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 133-158, April.
    10. Rainer Kolisch & Erik Demeulemeester & Rubén Ruiz Garcia & Vincent T’Kindt & Jan Węglarz, 2016. "Editorial “Project Management and Scheduling”," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(2), pages 279-281, March.
    11. Akshay Chowdu & Peter Nesbitt & Andrea Brickey & Alexandra M. Newman, 2022. "Operations Research in Underground Mine Planning: A Review," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 109-132, March.
    12. Jesús Isaac Vázquez-Serrano & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García, 2021. "Agent Scheduling in Unrelated Parallel Machines with Sequence- and Agent–Machine–Dependent Setup Time Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-34, November.
    13. Cinna Seifi & Marco Schulze & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2021. "Solution procedures for block selection and sequencing in flat-bedded potash underground mines," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(2), pages 409-440, June.
    14. Hossein Abbaspour & Carsten Drebenstedt, 2023. "Truck–Shovel vs. In-Pit Crushing and Conveying Systems in Open Pit Mines: A Technical Evaluation for Selecting the Most Effective Transportation System by System Dynamics Modeling," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Marco Schulze & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2017. "Staff and machine shift scheduling in a German potash mine," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 635-656, December.
    16. Zeng, Lanyan & Liu, Shi Qiang & Kozan, Erhan & Corry, Paul & Masoud, Mahmoud, 2021. "A comprehensive interdisciplinary review of mine supply chain management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Nikodem Szlązak & Marek Korzec, 2022. "The Solution of the Main Fan Station for Underground Mines Being Decommissioned in Terms of Reducing Energy Consumption by Ventilation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Siyu Tu & Mingtao Jia & Liguan Wang & Shuzhao Feng & Shuang Huang, 2022. "A Multi-Equipment Task Assignment Model for the Horizontal Stripe Pre-Cut Mining Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Chimunhu, Prosper & Topal, Erkan & Ajak, Ajak Duany & Asad, Waqar, 2022. "A review of machine learning applications for underground mine planning and scheduling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Sergey Zhironkin & Elena Dotsenko, 2023. "Review of Transition from Mining 4.0 to 5.0 in Fossil Energy Sources Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-35, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7306-:d:1134662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.