IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v72y2021ics0301420721000696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hazard identification methodology for underground coal mine risk management - Root-State Hazard Identification

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Quanlong
  • Peng, Yumeng
  • Li, Zhiyang
  • Zhao, Pan
  • Qiu, Zunxiang

Abstract

Hazard identification is the basis and premise of underlying risk management in underground coal mines. Although a large amount of research has been conducted on hazard identification methods applied to underground coal mines, additional improvements are possible. The traditional hazard identification methods apply to a specific incident or event or are based on experience and therefore lack a systematic and comprehensive identification framework. In this paper, the Root-State Hazard Identification (RSHI) method is proposed to solve the above issues and identify the hazards in underground coal mine risk management. Firstly, the paper categorizes the underground coal mine hazards into root hazards and state hazards and then differentiates their internal relationships. Secondly, the paper explores the relationships among the hazards, risks and accidents in detail. Thirdly, the framework of the RSHI method is proposed based on the hazard classification and relationships among the hazards, risks and accidents. Finally, the proposed RSHI method is applied to identify hazards associated with the risk management of six mines that belong to the Yima Coal Industry Group in China. The results indicate that the RSHI method is capable of comprehensively identifying root hazards and state hazards associated with the underground coal mine risk management. Moreover, its application procedure is simple and convenient and reduces the need for the joint identification and coordination of various types of workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Quanlong & Peng, Yumeng & Li, Zhiyang & Zhao, Pan & Qiu, Zunxiang, 2021. "Hazard identification methodology for underground coal mine risk management - Root-State Hazard Identification," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:72:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721000696
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420721000696
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aven, Terje, 2011. "On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 719-726.
    2. Cheng-Wu Chen & Kevin Liu & Chun-Pin Tseng & Wen-Ko Hsu & Wei-Ling Chiang, 2012. "Hazard management and risk design by optimal statistical analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1707-1716, November.
    3. Aven, Terje, 2010. "On how to define, understand and describe risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 623-631.
    4. Aven, Terje, 2012. "The risk concept—historical and recent development trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 33-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng Wang & Qiang Wei & Guotang Zhao & Jingchun Wang & Yang Yin, 2022. "Safety Risk Identification Method for Railway Construction in Complex and Dangerous Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Jiskani, Izhar Mithal & Yasli, Fatma & Hosseini, Shahab & Rehman, Atta Ur & Uddin, Salah, 2022. "Improved Z-number based fuzzy fault tree approach to analyze health and safety risks in surface mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Li, Wanzhen & Zhou, Lujie & Hao, Jian & Yu, Kai & Chen, Jing & Liu, Pingping & Feng, Rui, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and control strategy exploration of the unsafe behavior of coal mine employees," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    4. Geng Zhang & Jin Guo & Yue Tan & Guohua Chen & Chilou Zhou & Wei Li & Li Xia, 2022. "Safety Analysis and Evaluation of Hydrogen Cylinder Periodic Inspection Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-9, September.
    5. Xiong, Yachao & Qi, Hui & Li, Zequan & Zhang, Qiuhan, 2023. "Where risk, where capability? Building the emergency management capability structure of coal mining enterprises based on risk matching perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aven, Terje, 2012. "On the link between risk and exposure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 191-199.
    2. Merkourios Papanikolaou & Yiannis Xenidis, 2020. "Risk-Informed Performance Assessment of Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Aven, Terje, 2013. "A conceptual framework for linking risk and the elements of the data–information–knowledge–wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 30-36.
    4. Nguyen, Son & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Du, Yuquan & Shi, Wenming, 2019. "A quantitative risk analysis model with integrated deliberative Delphi platform for container shipping operational risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 203-227.
    5. Goerlandt, Floris & Montewka, Jakub, 2015. "Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 115-134.
    6. Veland, H. & Aven, T., 2013. "Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 34-40.
    7. Dariusz Szmel & Wiesław Zabłocki & Przemysław Ilczuk & Andrzej Kochan, 2019. "Method for Selecting the Safety Integrity Level for the Control-Command and Signaling Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez & Xabier Martínez-Beneitez, 2020. "Identifying Risks for Better Project Management between Two Different Cultures: The Chinese and the Spanish," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Peter Blokland & Genserik Reniers, 2019. "An Ontological and Semantic Foundation for Safety and Security Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Wan, Chengpeng & Yan, Xinping & Zhang, Di & Qu, Zhuohua & Yang, Zaili, 2019. "An advanced fuzzy Bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 222-240.
    11. Garcez, Thalles Vitelli & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2014. "A risk measurement tool for an underground electricity distribution system considering the consequences and uncertainties of manhole events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 68-80.
    12. Borut Jereb, 2013. "Risk Assessment Model Respecting Segments Of The Public," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 9(3), pages 75-94.
    13. Montewka, Jakub & Goerlandt, Floris & Kujala, Pentti, 2014. "On a systematic perspective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 77-85.
    14. Christoph A Thieme & Børge Rokseth & Ingrid B Utne, 2023. "Risk-informed control systems for improved operational performance and decision-making," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(2), pages 332-354, April.
    15. Aven, Terje, 2012. "The risk concept—historical and recent development trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 33-44.
    16. Xiao Zhang & Xiaofeng Hu & Yiping Bai & Jiansong Wu, 2020. "Risk Assessment of Gas Leakage from School Laboratories Based on the Bayesian Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Gulsum Kubra Kaya & James Ward & John Clarkson, 2019. "A Review of Risk Matrices Used in Acute Hospitals in England," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 1060-1070, May.
    18. Antonín Korauš & Miroslav Gombár & Pavel Kelemen & Jozef Polák, 2019. "Analysis of respondents' opinions and attitudes toward the security of payment systems," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1987-2002, June.
    19. Marcela Tuzová & Martina Toulová & Lea Kubíčková, 2017. "The Specifics of the Internationalization Process of Czech SMEs in the Food Industry," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(3), pages 1055-1064.
    20. Charles Sabel & Gary Herrigel & Peer Hull Kristensen, 2018. "Regulation under uncertainty: The coevolution of industry and regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 371-394, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:72:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721000696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.