IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13698-d950234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Risk Identification Method for Railway Construction in Complex and Dangerous Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Qiang Wei

    (China State Railway Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100844, China)

  • Guotang Zhao

    (School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    China State Railway Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100844, China)

  • Jingchun Wang

    (School of Safety Engineering & Emergency Management, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China)

  • Yang Yin

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410017, China)

Abstract

Safety risk identification is the premise and foundation of safety risk management for railway construction. However, due to some characteristics of railway projects, which include large volumes of work, complex construction environments, and long construction cycles, etc., the risk factors of railway projects are often hidden in all stages of engineering construction. It results in the comprehensive identification of safety risks of railway projects being usually difficult, and this problem is more serious when the railway is constructed in complex and dangerous areas. Therefore, to identify the safety risks comprehensively, this paper constructs a safety risk identification method applicable to railway construction in complex and dangerous areas. This method studies the spatial and temporal distribution of risks and their relationship with subprojects by using a work breakdown structure (WBS), a risk breakdown structure (RBS), grid-based management, and forming a safety risk identification matrix, which can help researchers analyze the characteristics of risks. In order to verify the effectiveness of the method, the A Railway, which is located in the western of China, was selected as a case study, and risk identification for its civil engineering was carried out. The research results show that in the construction process of the A Railway, the main types of safety risks suffered by various branch projects were different. In addition, some risk factors only appeared at specific times in space, and there is a strong interaction between these risk factors. Based on this method, safety risk identification can intuitively discover the spatial and temporal distribution of risk factors and analyze the interaction between risk factors, which can provide help for the formulation of targeted risk control measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Wang & Qiang Wei & Guotang Zhao & Jingchun Wang & Yang Yin, 2022. "Safety Risk Identification Method for Railway Construction in Complex and Dangerous Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13698-:d:950234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13698/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13698/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junxia Miao & Dechun Huang & Zhengqi He, 2019. "Social Risk Assessment and Management for Major Construction Projects in China Based on Fuzzy Integrated Analysis," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-17, November.
    2. Liu, Quanlong & Peng, Yumeng & Li, Zhiyang & Zhao, Pan & Qiu, Zunxiang, 2021. "Hazard identification methodology for underground coal mine risk management - Root-State Hazard Identification," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Yachao & Qi, Hui & Li, Zequan & Zhang, Qiuhan, 2023. "Where risk, where capability? Building the emergency management capability structure of coal mining enterprises based on risk matching perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Geng Zhang & Jin Guo & Yue Tan & Guohua Chen & Chilou Zhou & Wei Li & Li Xia, 2022. "Safety Analysis and Evaluation of Hydrogen Cylinder Periodic Inspection Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-9, September.
    3. Li, Wanzhen & Zhou, Lujie & Hao, Jian & Yu, Kai & Chen, Jing & Liu, Pingping & Feng, Rui, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and control strategy exploration of the unsafe behavior of coal mine employees," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    4. Jiskani, Izhar Mithal & Yasli, Fatma & Hosseini, Shahab & Rehman, Atta Ur & Uddin, Salah, 2022. "Improved Z-number based fuzzy fault tree approach to analyze health and safety risks in surface mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13698-:d:950234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.