IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v51y2017icp243-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-stakeholder platform involving a mining company and neighbouring villages in China: Back to development issues

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Xia
  • Faysse, Nicolas
  • Ren, Xiaodong

Abstract

Mining companies are increasingly called on to organize compensation activities for the villages close to mining sites, using a participatory approach. In the Guizhou Province of China, when a gold mine was opened, most of the land farmed in the surrounding villages was expropriated. The mining company set up a multi-stakeholder platform to identify compensation activities. The platform included representatives from the villages, local government, the mining company and a provincial university. The article examines the relations between the different actors and assesses the activities that were developed. The multi-stakeholder platform enabled some communication between participants, but village representatives had very little say in the decision-making. Many infrastructure projects were implemented, but most income-generating projects failed. The funding provided by the mining company did not compensate for the lack of institutional support for designing and implementing income-generating projects capable of providing sustainable livelihoods to the villagers.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Xia & Faysse, Nicolas & Ren, Xiaodong, 2017. "A multi-stakeholder platform involving a mining company and neighbouring villages in China: Back to development issues," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 243-250.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:243-250
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.01.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420716303361
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.01.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang-Lee, Diane, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and public engagement for a Chinese state-backed mining project in Myanmar – Challenges and prospects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 28-37.
    2. Shidi Dong & Lei Xu, 2016. "The impact of explicit CSR regulation: evidence from China’s mining firms," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(2), pages 237-258, May.
    3. Wei Sun & Xiaona Lin & Yutian Liang & Lu Li, 2016. "Regional Inequality in Underdeveloped Areas: A Case Study of Guizhou Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Kemp, Deanna & Owen, John R., 2013. "Community relations and mining: Core to business but not “core business”," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 523-531.
    5. Ciaran O'Faircheallaigh, 2013. "Community development agreements in the mining industry: an emerging global phenomenon," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 222-238, May.
    6. Deanna Kemp & John Owen & Nora Gotzmann & Carol Bond, 2011. "Just Relations and Company–Community Conflict in Mining," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 93-109, June.
    7. Uwafiokun Idemudia, 2009. "Oil Extraction and Poverty Reduction in the Niger Delta: A Critical Examination of Partnership Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 91-116, May.
    8. Gardner, Katy & Ahmed, Zahir & Bashir, Fatema & Rana, Masud, 2012. "Elusive Partnerships: Gas extraction and CSR in Bangladesh," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 168-174.
    9. Gardner, Katy & Ahmed, Zahir & Bashir, Fatema & Rana, Masud, 2012. "Elusive partnerships: gas extraction and CSR in Bangladesh," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 52763, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Fuisz-Kehrbach, Sonja-Katrin, 2015. "A three-dimensional framework to explore corporate sustainability activities in the mining industry: Current status and challenges ahead," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 101-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2020. "Effects of the private land acquisition process and costs on mining enterprises before mining operation activities in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Cui, Li & Chan, Hing Kai & Zhou, Yizhuo & Dai, Jing & Lim, Jia Jia, 2019. "Exploring critical factors of green business failure based on Grey-Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 450-461.
    3. Bimo Ren & Kangning Xiong & Qi Wang, 2022. "Revitalization mechanism of specialty industries in the karst rocky desertification areas: From a perspective of the actor‐network theory," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1362-1383, September.
    4. Bice, Sara & Brueckner, Martin & Pforr, Christof, 2017. "Putting social license to operate on the map: A social, actuarial and political risk and licensing model (SAP Model)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 46-55.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erdiaw-Kwasie, Michael Odei & Abunyewah, Matthew & Baah, Charles, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and cognitive bias: A systematic review and research direction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    2. Wang, Jian & Huang, Xu & Hu, Ke & Li, Xin, 2018. "Evaluation on community development programs in mining industry: A case study of small and medium enterprise in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 516-524.
    3. Fraser, Jocelyn & Kunz, Nadja C. & Batdorj, Bulgan, 2019. "Can mineral exploration projects create and share value with communities? A case study from Mongolia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Wang, Jian & Huang, Xu & Hu, Ke & Cui, Zhou-quan & Li, Xin, 2017. "An exploration on corporate-community relationship in mining sector in China – Lessons from Yunnan Phosphate Chemical Group Co., Ltd," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 54-64.
    5. Bezzola, Selina & Günther, Isabel & Brugger, Fritz & Lefoll, Erwin, 2022. "CSR and local conflicts in African mining communities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Fuisz-Kehrbach, Sonja-Katrin, 2015. "A three-dimensional framework to explore corporate sustainability activities in the mining industry: Current status and challenges ahead," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 101-115.
    7. Lacey, Justine & Carr-Cornish, Simone & Zhang, Airong & Eglinton, Kelvyn & Moffat, Kieren, 2017. "The art and science of community relations: Procedural fairness at Newmont's Waihi Gold operations, New Zealand," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 245-254.
    8. Bozigar, Matthew & Gray, Clark L. & Bilsborrow, Richard E., 2016. "Oil Extraction and Indigenous Livelihoods in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 125-135.
    9. Idemudia, Uwafiokun & Tuokuu, Francis Xavier D. & Essah, Marcellinus, 2022. "The extractive industry and human rights in Africa: Lessons from the past and future directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Peng, Xinyuan & Tang, Pengcheng & Yang, Shuwang & Fu, Shuke, 2020. "How should mining firms invest in the multidimensions of corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Conteh, Felix Marco & Maconachie, Roy, 2019. "Spaces for contestation: The politics of community development agreements in Sierra Leone," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 231-240.
    12. Belal, Ataur Rahman & Cooper, Stuart M. & Khan, Niaz Ahmed, 2015. "Corporate environmental responsibility and accountability: What chance in vulnerable Bangladesh?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 44-58.
    13. Gardner, Katy & Gerharz, Eva, 2016. "Introduction. Land, ‘development’ and ‘security’ in Bangladesh and India," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84406, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Veldhuizen, Caroline & Desouza, Kevin C. & Bandara, Wasana & Chang, Artemis, 2022. "How much is not enough: Corporate social responsibility and beyond in the resources sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Sharon McLennan & Glenn Banks, 2019. "Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 117-126, January.
    16. Olsen, Brett C. & Awuah-Offei, Kwame & Bumblauskas, Daniel, 2021. "Setting materiality thresholds for ESG disclosures: A case study of U. S. mine safety disclosures," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Stephany I Pasaribu & Frank Vanclay & Yongjun Zhao, 2020. "Challenges to Implementing Socially-Sustainable Community Development in Oil Palm and Forestry Operations in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Gardner, Katy, 2018. "We demand work! ‘Dispossession’, patronage and village labour in Bibiyana, Bangladesh," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86541, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Mnwana, Sonwabile & Bowman, Andrew, 2018. "Mine mechanisation and distributional conflict in rural South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 227-237.
    20. Prabhir Poruthiyil, 2013. "Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 735-749, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:243-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.