IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v58y2017icp31-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuity and change in American urban freeway networks

Author

Listed:
  • Weber, Joe

Abstract

The American Interstate Highway System was created in 1944, though construction did not commence until 1956. During the planning process for this network the blueprint for American urban freeway systems was set in 1955 by a federal document called the Yellow Book. This provided about 100 maps of cities with planned urban freeway locations for the Interstate Highway System. A set of three basic network patterns were applied to these cities based on their size and location. In the half century since 1955 urban freeways in the Interstate System have expanded from a planned 2000miles to over 16,600miles, along with another 11,500miles of non-Interstate freeways. The number of large metropolitan areas has increased tremendously while the monocentric commuting patterns of have been transformed. This paper explores how these urban freeway systems were applied to the country's urban geography of the 1950s and how they have adapted to changing populations and other transformations in American metropolitan areas in the last half century.

Suggested Citation

  • Weber, Joe, 2017. "Continuity and change in American urban freeway networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 31-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:58:y:2017:i:c:p:31-39
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692316306834
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taylor, Brian D., 1995. "Public Perceptions, Fiscal Realities, and Freeway Planning: The California Case," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt51m2v0vz, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Pengyu Zhu & Jeffrey Brown, 2013. "Donor states and donee states: investigating geographic redistribution of the US federal-aid highway program 1974–2008," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 203-227, January.
    3. Weber, Joe, 2012. "The evolving Interstate Highway System and the changing geography of the United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 70-86.
    4. Ribeiro, Anabela & Antunes, António Pais & Páez, Antonio, 2010. "Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: Empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 125-132.
    5. B J Linneker & N A Spence, 1992. "Accessibility Measures Compared in an Analysis of the Impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(8), pages 1137-1154, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dawei Chen & Fangxu Mo & Ye Chen & Jun Zhang & Xinyu You, 2022. "Optimization of Ramp Locations along Freeways: A Dynamic Programming Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Weber, Joe, 2018. "Route change on the American freeway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 12-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Gutiérrez, Javier & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2011. "Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 185-203, March.
    2. Weber, Joe, 2012. "The evolving Interstate Highway System and the changing geography of the United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 70-86.
    3. Weber, Joe, 2018. "Route change on the American freeway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 12-23.
    4. Wesley E. Marshall & Eric Dumbaugh, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between traffic congestion and the economy: a longitudinal examination of U.S. metropolitan areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 275-314, February.
    5. An Liu & Henk Folmer & Johan H L Oud, 2014. "Estimation of Autoregressive Models with Two Types of Weak Spatial Dependence by Means of the W-Based and the Latent Variables Approach: Evidence from Monte Carlo Simulations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(1), pages 186-202, January.
    6. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    7. Han, Feng & Ke, Shanzi, 2016. "The effects of factor proximity and market potential on urban manufacturing output," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 31-45.
    8. Paul Lawless & Tony Gore, 1999. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Case Study of Sheffield 1992-96," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 527-545, March.
    9. Áron Kovács & András Bozóti & Zsuzsanna Pótó & Márta Bakucz, 2014. "Medicinal and Thermal Spas in South and West Transdanubia - The Significance of Accessibility," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 5(5), pages 81-98, October.
    10. Chandra, Shailesh & Naik, R. Thirumaleswara & Venkatesh, Manoj & Mudgal, Abhisek, 2021. "Accessibility evaluations of the proposed road user charge (RUC) program in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 12-26.
    11. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. J Gutiérrez & A Monzón & J M Piñero, 1998. "Accessibility, Network Efficiency, and Transport Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(8), pages 1337-1350, August.
    13. Federico Pablo-Martí & Ángel Alañón-Pardo & Angel Sánchez, 2021. "Complex networks to understand the past: the case of roads in Bourbon Spain," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 15(3), pages 477-534, September.
    14. Matthias Sweet, 2014. "Traffic Congestion’s Economic Impacts: Evidence from US Metropolitan Regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(10), pages 2088-2110, August.
    15. Cahoon, Stephen & Pateman, Hilary & Chen, Shu-Ling, 2013. "Regional port authorities: leading players in innovation networks?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 66-75.
    16. Koray Caglayan & Steven M. Sheffrin, 2020. "Giver and Taker States Over the Business Cycle," Working Papers 2001, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    17. P Lawless & G Dabinett, 1995. "Urban Regeneration and Transport Investment: A Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(7), pages 1029-1048, July.
    18. Rocha, Bruno T. & Afonso, Nuno & Melo, Patrícia C. & de Abreu e Silva, João, 2022. "What drives the allocation of motorways? Evidence from Portugal's fast-expanding network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. Zhu, Pengyu & Tan, Xinying & Zhao, Songnian & Shi, Shuai & Wang, Mingshu, 2022. "Land use regulations, transit investment, and commuting preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    20. Zhang, Wenxi & Wang, Bo & Wang, Jian & Wu, Qun & Wei, Yehua Dennis, 2022. "How does industrial agglomeration affect urban land use efficiency? A spatial analysis of Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:58:y:2017:i:c:p:31-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.