IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v81y2024ics0969698924002650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The human touch vs. AI efficiency: How perceived status, effort, and loyalty shape consumer satisfaction with preferential treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Sunhwa
  • Yi, Youjae
  • Zhao, Xiaohong

Abstract

This research investigates the impact of service agent type, human versus artificial intelligence (AI), on consumer satisfaction with preferential treatment. Through four studies conducted in both online and field settings, we demonstrate that consumers experience greater satisfaction when preferential treatment comes from a human agent compared to an AI agent. This effect is driven by two underlying mechanisms: the perception of elevated status and the perception of greater effort exerted by the supplier. Additionally, the difference in consumer satisfaction between agent types diminishes when consumers have strong prior loyalty to the company. These findings offer theoretical implications and managerial insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Sunhwa & Yi, Youjae & Zhao, Xiaohong, 2024. "The human touch vs. AI efficiency: How perceived status, effort, and loyalty shape consumer satisfaction with preferential treatment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924002650
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924002650
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924002650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.