IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v36y2017icp148-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“First in first out†or “last in first out†: Presentation of information order on evaluation of utilitarian products

Author

Listed:
  • Tingchi Liu, Matthew
  • Phau, Ian
  • Teah, Min

Abstract

This study investigates how the presentation order of information may affect the evaluation of utilitarian products. Three experiments with different conditions (hedonic/utilitarian product; experience/search advertisement; unattractive/attractive packaging) were conducted with a total of 334 participants in Macau. This study tests both the affective and cognitive product evaluation. The findings indicate that assimilation effect occurs if the search advertisement of a utilitarian product is presented before and if the consumers have better cognitive evaluation. When an experience advertisement is presented before, contrast effect occurs and affective evaluation is reduced. However, when unattractive packaging is presented before, assimilation effect occurs, and cognitive evaluation is increased. When attractive packaging is presented before, the consumers demonstrate a positive cognitive and affective evaluation for the utilitarian product. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the role of presentation order on the consumers’ evaluation of utilitarian products from theoretical and managerial perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingchi Liu, Matthew & Phau, Ian & Teah, Min, 2017. "“First in first out†or “last in first out†: Presentation of information order on evaluation of utilitarian products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 148-155.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:36:y:2017:i:c:p:148-155
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698916301850
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    2. Wright, Alice A & Lynch, John G, Jr, 1995. "Communication Effects of Advertising versus Direct Experience When Both Search and Experience Attributes Are Present," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(4), pages 708-718, March.
    3. Adriana V. Madzharov & Suresh Ramanathan & Lauren G. Block, 2016. "The Halo Effect of Product Color Lightness on Hedonic Food Consumption," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(4), pages 579-591.
    4. Chernev, Alexander, 2001. "The Impact of Common Features on Consumer Preferences: A Case of Confirmatory Reasoning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(4), pages 475-488, March.
    5. Xin Ge & Gerald Häubl & Terry Elrod, 2012. "What to Say When: Influencing Consumer Choice by Delaying the Presentation of Favorable Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(6), pages 1004-1021.
    6. Brunel, Frédéric F. & Nelson, Michelle R., 2003. "Message Order Effects and Gender Differences in Advertising Persuasion," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 330-341, September.
    7. Rajesh Bagchi & Derick F. Davis, 2012. "$29 for 70 Items or 70 Items for $29? How Presentation Order Affects Package Perceptions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 62-73.
    8. Keith Wilcox & Anne L. Roggeveen & Dhruv Grewal, 2011. "Shall I Tell You Now or Later? Assimilation and Contrast in the Evaluation of Experiential Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(4), pages 763-773.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Peiyao & Zhang, Chao, 2023. "Show me insides: Investigating the influences of product exploded view on consumers’ mental imagery, comprehension, attitude, and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davis, Robert & Smith, Sandra D. & Lang, Bodo U., 2017. "A comparison of online and offline gender and goal directed shopping online," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 118-125.
    2. Küper, Inken & Edinger-Schons, Laura Marie, 2020. "Is sharing up for sale? Monetary exchanges in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 223-234.
    3. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    4. Holmqvist, Jonas & Lunardo, Renaud, 2015. "The impact of an exciting store environment on consumer pleasure and shopping intentions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 117-119.
    5. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Retail shopper confusion: Conceptualization, scale development, and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3459-3467.
    6. Moriuchi, Emi & Takahashi, Ikuo, 2022. "The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 76-88.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:972-988 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Wagner, Tillmann & Rudolph, Thomas, 2010. "Towards a hierarchical theory of shopping motivation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 415-429.
    9. Nitin Walia & Mark Srite & Wendy Huddleston, 2016. "Eyeing the web interface: the influence of price, product, and personal involvement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 297-333, September.
    10. Mijeong Noh & Rodney C Runyan & Jon Mosier, 2017. "Hedonic/Utilitarian Cool Attitudes: A Comparison of Young Female and Male Consumers," Current Trends in Fashion Technology & Textile Engineering, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(1), pages 1-2, October.
    11. Se Ran Yoo & Suk Won Lee & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2020. "The Role of Customer Experience, Food Healthiness, and Value for Revisit Intention in GROCERANT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Pennings, J.S.J. & van Kranenburg, H.L. & Hagedoorn, J., 2005. "Past, present and future of the telecommunications industry," Research Memorandum 016, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    13. Aydinli, Aylin & Lamey, Lien & Millet, Kobe & ter Braak, Anne & Vuegen, Maya, 2021. "How Do Customers Alter Their Basket Composition When They Perceive the Retail Store to Be Crowded? An Empirical Study," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 207-216.
    14. Teller, Christoph & Kotzab, Herbert & Grant, David B., 2012. "The relevance of shopper logistics for consumers of store-based retail formats," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 59-66.
    15. Jing Wang & Jay In Oh, 2023. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Continuous Purchase Intentions on TikTok: An Examination from the Uses and Gratifications (U&G) Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Fuentes, Christian & Bäckström, Kristina & Svingstedt, Anette, 2017. "Smartphones and the reconfiguration of retailscapes: Stores, shopping, and digitalization," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 270-278.
    18. Lee, Jung Ick & Ren, Tianbao & Park, Jungkun, 2021. "Investigating travelers’ multi-impulse buying behavior in airport duty-free shopping for Chinese traveler: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Mario Herberz & Tobias Brosch & Ulf J. J. Hahnel, 2020. "Kilo what? Default units increase value sensitivity in joint evaluations of energy efficiency," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(6), pages 972-988, November.
    20. repec:dgr:rugsom:04f04 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Bhargave, Rajesh & Chakravarti, Amitav & Guha, Abhijit, 2015. "Two-stage decisions increase preference for hedonic options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64119, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    22. Thac Dang‐Van & Tan Vo‐Thanh & Jianming Wang & Ninh Nguyen, 2023. "Luxury hotels' green practices and consumer brand identification: The roles of perceived green service innovation and perceived values," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4568-4583, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:36:y:2017:i:c:p:148-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.