IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v28y2000i1p77-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational diversity, evolution and cladistic classifications

Author

Listed:
  • McCarthy, Ian
  • Ridgway, Keith
  • Leseure, Michel
  • Fieller, Nick

Abstract

This article presents a case for the construction of a formal classification of manufacturing systems using cladistics, a technique from the biological school of classification. A seven-stage framework for producing a manufacturing cladogram is presented, along with a pilot case study example. This article describes the role that classification plays in the pure and applied sciences, the social sciences and reviews the status of existing manufacturing classifications. If organisational diversity and organisational change processes are governed by evolutionary mechanisms, studies of organisations based on an evolutionary approach such as cladistics could have potential, because as March [March JG. The evolution of evolution. In: Baum JAC, Singh JV, editors. Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford University Press, 1994. p. 39-52], page 45, states "there is natural speculation that organisations, like species can be engineered by understanding the evolutionary processes well enough to intervene and produce competitive organisational effects". It is suggested that a cladistic study could provide organisations with a "knowledge map" of the ecosystem in which they exist and by using this phylogenetic and situational analysis, they could determine coherent and appropriate action for the specification of change.

Suggested Citation

  • McCarthy, Ian & Ridgway, Keith & Leseure, Michel & Fieller, Nick, 2000. "Organisational diversity, evolution and cladistic classifications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 77-95, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:28:y:2000:i:1:p:77-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(99)00030-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cep, 1996. "Annual Review 1994-95," CEP Discussion Papers dp0273, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Milton Leontiades & Ahmet Tezel, 1980. "Planning perceptions and planning results," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 65-75, January.
    3. Armstrong, J. Scott, 1991. "Strategic Planning Improves Manufacturing Performance," MPRA Paper 81677, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Cep, 1996. "Annual Review 1995/96," CEP Discussion Papers dp0332, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goumagias, Nikolaos & Fernandes, Kiran Jude & Nucciarelli, Alberto & Li, Feng, 2022. "How to overcome path dependency through resource reconfiguration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 78-91.
    2. Kanchiralla, Fayas Malik & Jalo, Noor & Thollander, Patrik & Andersson, Maria & Johnsson, Simon, 2021. "Energy use categorization with performance indicators for the food industry and a conceptual energy planning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    3. Lei Shi & John Evans & Yifei Li, 2018. "A Systems Analysis of Drivers of Individual Bankruptcies," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 37(4), pages 390-398, December.
    4. Aggarwal, Raj & Berrill, Jenny & Hutson, Elaine & Kearney, Colm, 2011. "What is a multinational corporation? Classifying the degree of firm-level multinationality," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 557-577, October.
    5. Lei Shi & Neil Allan & John Evans & Yin Yun, 2018. "Significance of Controllable and Uncontrollable Drivers in Credit Defaults," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 37(1), pages 30-41, March.
    6. Kurt Dopfer, 2016. "Evolutionary economics," Chapters, in: Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume III, chapter 14, pages 175-193, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Scott Armstrong, 1982. "The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 197-211, July.
    2. Rodolfo M. Nayga & Lukman M. Baga, 1995. "Economic reforms and firm level strategic planning," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(6), pages 565-572.
    3. Rudd, John M. & Greenley, Gordon E. & Beatson, Amanda T. & Lings, Ian N., 2008. "Strategic planning and performance: Extending the debate," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 99-108, February.
    4. Armstrong, J. Scott, 1983. "Strategic Planning and Forecasting Fundamentals," MPRA Paper 81682, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Labroukos, N. S. & Lioukas, S. & Chambers, D., 1995. "Planning and performance in state-owned enterprises: A multidimensional assessment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 624-640, December.
    6. Mahmood S. Bahaee, 1993. "Strategy-Comprehensiveness Fit and Perfor Mance," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 17(2), pages 195-215, December.
    7. Myron Gable & Martin T. Topol, 1987. "Planning Practices of Small-Scale Retailers," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 12(2), pages 19-32, October.
    8. P. Maik Hamann, 2017. "Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 227-289, August.
    9. Armstrong, J. Scott, 1991. "Strategic Planning Improves Manufacturing Performance," MPRA Paper 81677, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Abbas Mohammed Hussein & Mohammed Mustafa Ahmed & Mohamed Yahya Mahmoud Khudari, 2021. "The Impact of Strategic Planning in the University’s Competitiveness According to NIAS," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, September.
    11. McManus, Ginette & Saint-Pierre, Jacques & Domonkos, John, 1995. "Formal strategic planning, informedness and firm performance: An empirical investigation," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 47-63.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:28:y:2000:i:1:p:77-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.