IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v27y1999i5p583-592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cellular vs process layouts: an analytic investigation of the impact of learning on shop performance

Author

Listed:
  • Kannan, Vijay R.
  • Palocsay, Susan W.

Abstract

Evidence from the literature on cellular manufacturing suggests that shops configured as manufacturing cells perform poorly compared to job shops. However, cellular shops, being conducive to the use of teams in the assignment of production activities, have the potential to yield higher productivity than a job shop. Productivity differentials, and in particular, differences in the rates at which processing times can be reduced, have been largely overlooked in prior comparisons of cellular and job shops. This paper uses queuing theory to illustrate the relationship between processing time learning rates and flow time performance in cellular and job shops. Models are developed that make it possible to estimate the learning rate required in a cellular shop in order for it to yield performance comparable to that of a job shop. Simulation is used to validate the models under dynamic conditions as opposed to the steady state conditions assumed by queuing theory. Results indicate that a cellular shop need only achieve a marginally higher learning rate than a job shop in order to perform at a comparable level.

Suggested Citation

  • Kannan, Vijay R. & Palocsay, Susan W., 1999. "Cellular vs process layouts: an analytic investigation of the impact of learning on shop performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 583-592, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:27:y:1999:i:5:p:583-592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(99)00020-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nallan C. Suresh & Jack R. Meredith, 1994. "Coping with the Loss of Pooling Synergy in Cellular Manufacturing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 466-483, April.
    2. John S. Morris & Richard J. Tersine, 1990. "A Simulation Analysis of Factors Influencing the Attractiveness of Group Technology Cellular Layouts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(12), pages 1567-1578, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Cheng, Chun Hung, 2007. "Multi-period planning and uncertainty issues in cellular manufacturing: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 281-309, February.
    2. Chakravorty, Satya S. & Hales, Douglas N., 2004. "Implications of cell design implementation: A case study and analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 602-614, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D'Angelo, Andrea & Gastaldi, Massimo & Levialdi, Nathan, 2000. "Production variability and shop configuration: An experimental analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 43-57, October.
    2. Shambu, Girish & Suresh, Nallan C., 2000. "Performance of hybrid cellular manufacturing systems: A computer simulation investigation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 436-458, January.
    3. Jensen, John B., 2000. "The impact of resource flexibility and staffing decisions on cellular and departmental shop performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 279-296, December.
    4. Kannan, V. R. & Ghosh, S., 1995. "Using dynamic cellular manufacturing to simplify scheduling in cell based production systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 443-452, August.
    5. Shafer, S. M. & Meredith, J. R. & Marsh, R. F., 1995. "A taxonomy for alternative equipment groupings in batch environments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 361-376, August.
    6. Olorunniwo, Festus & Udo, Godwin, 2002. "The impact of management and employees on cellular manufacturing implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 27-38, March.
    7. Manning, William & Jensen, John, 2006. "Evaluating the shop-wide performance effect of pooling synergy with analytical models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1009-1020, December.
    8. Plaquin, Marie-France & Pierreval, Henri, 2000. "Cell formation using evolutionary algorithms with certain constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 267-278, March.
    9. repec:dgr:rugsom:95a45 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Logendran, Rasaratnam & Talkington, Diane, 1997. "Analysis of cellular and functional manufacturing systems in the presence of machine breakdown," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 239-256, December.
    11. van der Vaart, Taco & Wijngaard, Jacob, 2007. "The contribution of focus in collaborative planning for make-to-order production situation with large set-up times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 436-443, July.
    12. Hosseini, Amir & Otto, Alena & Pesch, Erwin, 2024. "Scheduling in manufacturing with transportation: Classification and solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 821-843.
    13. Jing, Hao & Sheng, Lijuan & Luo, Chaorui & Kwak, Choonjong, 2021. "Statistical analysis of family based dispatching rules and preemption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    14. Benjaafar, Saifallah, 1996. "Modeling and analysis of machine sharing in manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 56-73, May.
    15. Saif Benjaafar & Sunderesh S. Heragu & Shahrukh A. Irani, 2002. "Next Generation Factory Layouts: Research Challenges and Recent Progress," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 58-76, December.
    16. Shanker, Ravi & Vrat, Prem, 1998. "Post design modeling for cellular manufacturing system with cost uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 97-109, June.
    17. Das, K. & Lashkari, R.S. & Sengupta, S., 2007. "Reliability consideration in the design and analysis of cellular manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 243-262, January.
    18. Shruti Shashikumar & Rakesh D. Raut & Vaibhav S. Narwane & Bhaskar B. Gardas & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Anjali Awasthi, 2019. "A novel approach to determine the cell formation using heuristics approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 628-656, September.
    19. Riezebos, J. & Gaalman, G.J.C., 1995. "Relations between cells in cellular manufacturing," Research Report 95A45, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Cao, Qidong & Patterson, J. Wayne & Bai, Xue, 2005. "Reexamination of processing time uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 185-194, July.
    21. Molleman, Eric & Slomp, Jannes & Rolefes, Samantha, 2002. "The evolution of a cellular manufacturing system - a longitudinal case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 305-322, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:27:y:1999:i:5:p:583-592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.