IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v152y2004i3p602-614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of cell design implementation: A case study and analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chakravorty, Satya S.
  • Hales, Douglas N.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakravorty, Satya S. & Hales, Douglas N., 2004. "Implications of cell design implementation: A case study and analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 602-614, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:152:y:2004:i:3:p:602-614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(03)00060-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albino, Vito & Claudio Garavelli, A., 1999. "Limited flexibility in cellular manufacturing systems: A simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 447-455, April.
    2. Kannan, Vijay R. & Palocsay, Susan W., 1999. "Cellular vs process layouts: an analytic investigation of the impact of learning on shop performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 583-592, October.
    3. Shambu, Girish & Suresh, Nallan C., 2000. "Performance of hybrid cellular manufacturing systems: A computer simulation investigation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 436-458, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dekkers, Rob, 2018. "Group technology: Amalgamation with design of organisational structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 262-277.
    2. Chakravorty, Satya S. & Hales, Douglas N., 2008. "The evolution of manufacturing cells: An action research study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 153-168, July.
    3. Satya S. Chakravorty & Aakash D. Shah, 2012. "Lean Six Sigma (LSS): an implementation experience," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 118-137.
    4. R Bhatnagar & V Saddikuti, 2010. "Models for cellular manufacturing systems design: matching processing requirements and operator capabilities," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(5), pages 827-839, May.
    5. Chakravorty, Satya S., 2009. "Improving distribution operations: Implementation of material handling systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 89-106, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Cheng, Chun Hung, 2007. "Multi-period planning and uncertainty issues in cellular manufacturing: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 281-309, February.
    2. Legros, Benjamin & Jouini, Oualid & Dallery, Yves, 2015. "A flexible architecture for call centers with skill-based routing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 192-207.
    3. Hachicha, Wafik & Masmoudi, Faouzi & Haddar, Mohamed, 2007. "An improvement of a cellular manufacturing system design using simulation analysis," MPRA Paper 8922, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 22 Dec 2007.
    4. Garavelli, A. Claudio, 2003. "Flexibility configurations for the supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 141-153, August.
    5. Garavelli, A. Claudio, 2001. "Performance analysis of a batch production system with limited flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 39-48, January.
    6. Agarwal, Atul, 2008. "Partitioning bottleneck work center for cellular manufacturing: An integrated performance and cost model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 635-647, February.
    7. Yin, Yong & Yasuda, Kazuhiko, 2006. "Similarity coefficient methods applied to the cell formation problem: A taxonomy and review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 329-352, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:152:y:2004:i:3:p:602-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.