IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v115y2023ics0305048322001864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Precedence Constrained Knapsack Problem with Uncertain Item Weights for Personalized Learning Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Aslan, Ayse
  • Ursavas, Evrim
  • Romeijnders, Ward

Abstract

This paper studies a unique precedence constrained knapsack problem in which there are two methods available to place an item in the knapsack. Whether or not an item weight is uncertain depends on which one of the two methods is selected. This knapsack problem models students’ decisions on choosing subjects to study in hybrid personalized learning systems in which students can study either under teacher supervision or in an unsupervised self-study mode by using online tools. We incorporate the uncertainty in the problem using a chance-constrained programming framework. Under the assumption that uncertain item weights are independently and normally distributed, we focus on the deterministic reformulation in which the capacity constraint involves a nonlinear and convex function of the decision variables. By using the first-order linear approximations of this function, we propose an exact cutting plane method that iteratively adds feasibility cuts. To supplement this, we develop novel approximate cutting plane methods that converge quickly to high-quality feasible solutions. To improve the computational efficiency of our methods, we introduce new pre-processing procedures to eliminate items beforehand and cover cuts to refine the feasibility space. Our computational experiments on small and large problem instances show that the optimality gaps of our approximate methods are very small overall, and that they are even able to find solutions with no optimality gaps as the number of items increases in the instances. Moreover, our experiments demonstrate that our pre-processing methods are particularly effective when the precedence relations are dense, and that our cover cuts may significantly speed up our exact cutting plane approach in challenging instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Aslan, Ayse & Ursavas, Evrim & Romeijnders, Ward, 2023. "A Precedence Constrained Knapsack Problem with Uncertain Item Weights for Personalized Learning Systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:115:y:2023:i:c:s0305048322001864
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048322001864
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renaud Chicoisne & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Enrique Rubio, 2012. "A New Algorithm for the Open-Pit Mine Production Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 517-528, June.
    2. D. S. Johnson & K. A. Niemi, 1983. "On Knapsacks, Partitions, and a New Dynamic Programming Technique for Trees," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Johnes, Jill, 2015. "Operational Research in education," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 683-696.
    4. Nelishia Pillay, 2014. "A survey of school timetabling research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 218(1), pages 261-293, July.
    5. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    6. Knut Haase & Jörg Latteier & Andreas Schirmer, 1999. "Course Planning at Lufthansa Technical Training: Constructing More Profitable Schedules," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 95-109, October.
    7. Gregory A. Kasapidis & Dimitris C. Paraskevopoulos & Panagiotis P. Repoussis & Christos D. Tarantilis, 2021. "Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problems with Arbitrary Precedence Graphs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4044-4068, November.
    8. Samavati, Mehran & Essam, Daryl & Nehring, Micah & Sarker, Ruhul, 2018. "A new methodology for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 169-182.
    9. Nossack, Jenny, 2022. "Therapy scheduling and therapy planning at hospitals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. N. Samphaiboon & Y. Yamada, 2000. "Heuristic and Exact Algorithms for the Precedence-Constrained Knapsack Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 659-676, June.
    11. Kristiansen, Simon & Sørensen, Matias & Stidsen, Thomas R., 2011. "Elective course planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 713-720, December.
    12. Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Yue & Sun, Minghe, 2022. "A robust optimization approach for multi-product inventory management in a dual-channel warehouse under demand uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Aslan, Ayse & Bakir, Ilke & Vis, Iris F.A., 2020. "A dynamic thompson sampling hyper-heuristic framework for learning activity planning in personalized learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 673-688.
    14. Andrés Weintraub & Jorge Vera, 1991. "A Cutting Plane Approach for Chance Constrained Linear Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 776-785, October.
    15. Lin, C.K.Y., 2009. "Stochastic single-source capacitated facility location model with service level requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 439-451, February.
    16. Stefanie Kosuch & Abdel Lisser, 2010. "Upper bounds for the 0-1 stochastic knapsack problem and a B&B algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 77-93, April.
    17. Anjuli Kannan & Gerald van den Berg & Adeline Kuo, 2012. "iSchedule to Personalize Learning," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 437-448, October.
    18. Caserta, Marco & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "The robust multiple-choice multidimensional knapsack problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 16-27.
    19. Lu, Mengshi & Nakao, Hideaki & Shen, Siqian & Zhao, Lin, 2021. "Non-profit resource allocation and service scheduling with cross-subsidization and uncertain resource consumptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. G. C. Calafiore & L. El Ghaoui, 2006. "On Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Linear Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 1-22, July.
    21. You, Byungjun & Yamada, Takeo, 2007. "A pegging approach to the precedence-constrained knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 618-632, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fukasawa, Ricardo & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Oliveira, Daniel, 2024. "The price-elastic knapsack problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aslan, Ayse & Bakir, Ilke & Vis, Iris F.A., 2020. "A dynamic thompson sampling hyper-heuristic framework for learning activity planning in personalized learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 673-688.
    2. Bilsel, R. Ufuk & Ravindran, A., 2011. "A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1284-1300, September.
    3. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    4. Kınay, Ömer Burak & Yetis Kara, Bahar & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Correia, Isabel, 2018. "Modeling the shelter site location problem using chance constraints: A case study for Istanbul," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 132-145.
    5. Jélvez, Enrique & Morales, Nelson & Nancel-Penard, Pierre & Cornillier, Fabien, 2020. "A new hybrid heuristic algorithm for the Precedence Constrained Production Scheduling Problem: A mining application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. W. Lambert & A. Newman, 2014. "Tailored Lagrangian Relaxation for the open pit block sequencing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 419-438, November.
    7. Mai, Feng & Fry, Michael J. & Ohlmann, Jeffrey W., 2018. "Model-based capacitated clustering with posterior regularization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 594-605.
    8. Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Alexandra Newman, 2013. "MineLib: a library of open pit mining problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 93-114, July.
    9. Grani A. Hanasusanto & Vladimir Roitch & Daniel Kuhn & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2017. "Ambiguous Joint Chance Constraints Under Mean and Dispersion Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 751-767, June.
    10. Cinna Seifi & Marco Schulze & Jürgen Zimmermann, 2021. "Solution procedures for block selection and sequencing in flat-bedded potash underground mines," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(2), pages 409-440, June.
    11. Kameshwaran, S. & Narahari, Y., 2009. "Nonconvex piecewise linear knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 56-68, January.
    12. Dawen Yan & Xiaohui Zhang & Mingzheng Wang, 2021. "A robust bank asset allocation model integrating credit-rating migration risk and capital adequacy ratio regulations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 659-710, April.
    13. Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2022. "Facility Location in Logistics and Transportation: An enduring relationship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    14. Li, Linda & Firouz, Mohammad & Ahmed, Abdulaziz & Delen, Dursun, 2023. "On the Egalitarian–Utilitarian spectrum in stochastic capacitated resource allocation problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    15. Poojari, Chandra A. & Varghese, Boby, 2008. "Genetic Algorithm based technique for solving Chance Constrained Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1128-1154, March.
    16. Haonan, Zhou & Samavati, Mehran & Hill, Andrew J., 2021. "Heuristics for integrated blending optimisation in a mining supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Pinker, Edieal & Szmerekovsky, Joseph & Tilson, Vera, 2014. "On the complexity of project scheduling to minimize exposed time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 448-453.
    18. Kar, Sumi & Basu, Kajla & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2023. "Advertisement policy for dual-channel within emissions-controlled flexible production system," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    20. Azarnoosh Kafi & Behrouz Daneshian & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2021. "Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 41-59.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:115:y:2023:i:c:s0305048322001864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.