IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v84y2001i2p198-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individualism-Collectivism as a Boundary Condition for Effectiveness of Minority Influence in Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Ng, K. Yee
  • Van Dyne, Linn

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ng, K. Yee & Van Dyne, Linn, 2001. "Individualism-Collectivism as a Boundary Condition for Effectiveness of Minority Influence in Decision Making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 198-225, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:84:y:2001:i:2:p:198-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749-5978(00)92927-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwenk, Charles R., 1990. "Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 161-176, October.
    2. Richard O. Mason, 1969. "A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(8), pages 403-414, April.
    3. Probst, Tahira M. & Carnevale, Peter J. & Triandis, Harry C., 1999. "Cultural Values in Intergroup and Single-Group Social Dilemmas," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 171-191, March.
    4. Earley, P. Christopher, 1999. "Playing Follow the Leader: Status-Determining Traits in Relation to Collective Efficacy across Cultures," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 192-212, December.
    5. Schwenk, Charles & Valacich, Joseph S., 1994. "Effects of Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Individuals versus Groups," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 210-222, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Swaab, Roderick I. & Phillips, Katherine W. & Schaerer, Michael, 2016. "Secret conversation opportunities facilitate minority influence in virtual groups: The influence on majority power, information processing, and decision quality," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 17-32.
    2. Nemeth, Charlan Jeanne, 2010. "Minority Influence Theory," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt1pz676t7, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    3. Tiffany Trzebiatowski & María del Carmen Triana, 2020. "Family Responsibility Discrimination, Power Distance, and Emotional Exhaustion: When and Why are There Gender Differences in Work–Life Conflict?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 15-29, February.
    4. Adebowale Akande, 2009. "Comparing Social Behaviour Across Culture and Nations: The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ Questions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 591-608, July.
    5. Jennifer A. Chatman & Lindred L. Greer & Eliot Sherman & Bernadette Doerr, 2019. "Blurred Lines: How the Collectivism Norm Operates Through Perceived Group Diversity to Boost or Harm Group Performance in Himalayan Mountain Climbing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 235-259, March.
    6. Cooper, Danielle & Doucet, Lorna & Pratt, Michael G., 2005. "Understanding "Appropriateness" in Multinational Corporations," Working Papers 05-0122, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kasanen, Eero & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki & Zionts, Stanley, 2000. "A study of high-level managerial decision processes, with implications for MCDM research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 496-510, February.
    2. Schulz-Hardt, Stefan & Jochims, Marc & Frey, Dieter, 2002. "Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 563-586, July.
    3. Anselm Schneider, 2015. "Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 525-536, March.
    4. Florence Honore, 2014. "From Common Ground To Breaking New Ground: Founding Team's Prior Shared Experience And Start-Up Performance," Working Papers 14-39, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    5. van Dolen, Willemijn & de Ruyter, Ko & Carman, James, 2006. "The role of self- and group-efficacy in moderated group chat," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 324-343, June.
    6. Ori Weisel & Ro'i Zultan, 2013. "Social motives in intergroup conflict," Jena Economics Research Papers 2013-033, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    7. Muqtafi Akhmad & Shuang Chang & Hiroshi Deguchi, 2021. "Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 455-478, November.
    8. Anna Trunk & Hendrik Birkel & Evi Hartmann, 2020. "On the current state of combining human and artificial intelligence for strategic organizational decision making," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 875-919, November.
    9. Nemeth, Charlan & Goncalo, Jack, 2004. "Influence and Persuasion in Small Groups," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt9n8060j4, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    10. Mitchell, Rebecca & Boyle, Brendan & Nicholas, Stephen & Maitland, Elizabeth & Zhao, Shuming, 2016. "Boundary conditions of a curvilinear relationship between decision comprehensiveness and performance: The role of functional and national diversity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2801-2811.
    11. Cockrell, Cam & Stone, Dan N., 2011. "Team discourse explains media richness and anonymity effects in audit fraud cue brainstorming," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 225-242.
    12. He, Yue & Mo, Zan & Wan, Xiuqi & Li, Mengyin & Fu, Huijian, 2023. "Who will embrace upward line extension? The role of power distance belief," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Johannes Weisser, 2012. "Leading by example in intergroup competition: An experimental approach," Jena Economics Research Papers 2011-067, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    14. Xuhui Peng & Tian Qi & Gang Wang, 2022. "Board Gender Diversity, Corporate Social Disclosures, and National Culture," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    15. Stanford A Westjohn & Peter Magnusson & Yi Peng & Hyeyoon Jung, 2021. "Acting on anger: Cultural value moderators of the effects of consumer animosity," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1591-1615, October.
    16. Vesa Peltokorpi & Markus Pudelko, 2021. "When more is not better: A curvilinear relationship between foreign language proficiency and social categorization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 78-104, February.
    17. Barbara S. Lawrence, 2006. "Organizational Reference Groups: A Missing Perspective on Social Context," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 80-100, February.
    18. Frank Renkewitz & Heather M. Fuchs & Susann Fiedler, 2011. "Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(8), pages 870-881, December.
    19. Richard P. Nielsen & Christi Lockwood, 2018. "Varieties of Transformational Solutions to Institutional Ethics Logic Conflicts," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 45-55, April.
    20. Lam, Simon S. K. & Schaubroeck, John & Brown, Andrew D., 2004. "Esteem maintenance among groups: Laboratory and field studies of group performance cognitions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 86-101, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:84:y:2001:i:2:p:198-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.