IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v185y2024ics074959782400058x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The confrontation effect: When users engage more with ideology-inconsistent content online

Author

Listed:
  • Mochon, Daniel
  • Schwartz, Janet

Abstract

People typically engage with information that aligns with their ideology and avoid information that challenges it. Here, we demonstrate that online users can become relatively more engaged with content that clashes with their ideology, a pattern we label the confrontation effect. We further show that the outrage evoked by ideology-inconsistent content drives the confrontation effect and reconcile our findings with the more commonly observed congeniality bias. We employ a multi-method approach to test this theoretical framework via observational field data from Twitter, a series field experiments on Facebook, and online lab experiments. Collectively, these findings provide a balanced perspective on the interplay between user ideology and online engagement, with important implications for both organizations and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mochon, Daniel & Schwartz, Janet, 2024. "The confrontation effect: When users engage more with ideology-inconsistent content online," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s074959782400058x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074959782400058X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s074959782400058x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.