IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v149y2018icp35-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of a limited time perspective on information distortion

Author

Listed:
  • Chaxel, Anne-Sophie
  • Wiggins, Catherine
  • Xie, Jieru

Abstract

The present research examines how a limited time perspective influences the processing of new information during choice making. Specifically, we examine how perceptions of a limited future promote the distortion of new information in favor of one’s prior beliefs. Across five studies, we provide evidence of a link between more-limited time perspectives and higher information distortion, and we illuminate the proposed process: the adoption of a cognitive consistency goal when the time perspective is limited. Overall, the current work identifies a new driver of distortion—the amount of time individuals believe remains in the future. Furthermore, it contributes a novel source of biased information processing that is motivational in nature rather than the result of a lack of cognitive resources: the mere belief regarding how much time remains in the future influences information processing goals and, subsequently, how decision-makers process new information.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaxel, Anne-Sophie & Wiggins, Catherine & Xie, Jieru, 2018. "The impact of a limited time perspective on information distortion," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 35-46.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:35-46
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597817302819
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:6:p:572-585 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gilles Laurent & Raphaelle Lambert-Pandraud, 2010. "Why Do Older Consumers Buy Older Brands? The Role of Attachment and Declining Innovativeness," Post-Print hal-00528378, HAL.
    3. Gilles Laurent & Raphaelle Lambert-Pandraud & Eric Lapersonne, 2005. "Repeat Purchasing of New Automobiles by Older Consumers: Empirical Evidence and Interpretations," Post-Print hal-00458431, HAL.
    4. Kurt A. Carlson & Margaret G. Meloy & J. Edward Russo, 2006. "Leader-Driven Primacy: Using Attribute Order to Affect Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(4), pages 513-518, March.
    5. Patti Williams & Aimee Drolet, 2005. "Age-Related Differences in Responses to Emotional Advertisements," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 343-354, December.
    6. Bond, Samuel D. & Carlson, Kurt A. & Meloy, Margaret G. & Russo, J. Edward & Tanner, Robin J., 2007. "Information distortion in the evaluation of a single option," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 240-254, March.
    7. Carlson, Kurt A. & Tanner, Robin J. & Meloy, Margaret G. & Russo, J. Edward, 2014. "Catching nonconscious goals in the act of decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 65-76.
    8. Law, Sharmistha & Hawkins, Scott A & Craik, Fergus I M, 1998. "Repetition-Induced Belief in the Elderly: Rehabilitating Age-Related Memory Deficits," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 91-107, September.
    9. Yoon, Carolyn, 1997. "Age Differences in Consumers' Processing Strategies: An Investigation of Moderating Influences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(3), pages 329-342, December.
    10. Robyn A. LeBoeuf & Michael I. Norton, 2012. "Consequence-Cause Matching: Looking to the Consequences of Events to Infer Their Causes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 128-141.
    11. Cassie Mogilner & Jennifer Aaker & Sepandar D. Kamvar, 2012. "How Happiness Affects Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(2), pages 429-443.
    12. Meloy, Margaret G. & Russo, J. Edward, 2004. "Binary choice under instructions to select versus reject," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 114-128, March.
    13. Amit Bhattacharjee & Cassie Mogilner, 2014. "Happiness from Ordinary and Extraordinary Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 1-17.
    14. Chater, Nick & Loewenstein, George, 2016. "The under-appreciated drive for sense-making," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 126(PB), pages 137-154.
    15. Anne-Sophie Chaxel, 2016. "Why, When, and How Personal Control Impacts Information Processing: A Framework," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(1), pages 179-197.
    16. Gary J. Gaeth & Timothy B. Heath, 1987. "The Cognitive Processing of Misleading Adversiting in Young and Old Adults: Assessment and Training," Post-Print hal-00670556, HAL.
    17. Gaeth, Gary J & Heath, Timothy B, 1987. "The Cognitive Processing of Misleading Advertising in Young and Old Adults: Assessment and Training," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(1), pages 43-54, June.
    18. Edward J. Russo & Kurt A. Carlson & Margaret G. Meloy & Kevyn Yong, 2008. "The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion," Post-Print hal-00481326, HAL.
    19. Ian Skurnik & Carolyn Yoon & Denise C. Park & Norbert Schwarz, 2005. "How Warnings about False Claims Become Recommendations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 713-724, March.
    20. Russo, J. Edward & Medvec, Victoria Husted & Meloy, Margaret G., 1996. "The Distortion of Information during Decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 102-110, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moren Lévesque & Ute Stephan, 2020. "It’s Time We Talk About Time in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(2), pages 163-184, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolyn Yoon & Gilles Laurent & Helene Fung & Richard Gonzalez & Angela Gutchess & Trey Hedden & Raphaëlle Lambert-Pandraud & Mara Mather & Denise Park & Ellen Peters & Ian Skurnik, 2005. "Cognition, Persuasion and Decision Making in Older Consumers," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 429-441, December.
    2. Mischkowski, Dorothee & Glöckner, Andreas & Lewisch, Peter, 2021. "Information search, coherence effects, and their interplay in legal decision making," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:6:p:662-677 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Seth A. Miller & Michael L. DeKay & Eric R. Stone & Clare M. Sorenson, 2013. "Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(6), pages 662-677, November.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:6:p:572-585 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Robert Zniva & Wolfgang Weitzl, 2016. "It’s not how old you are but how you are old: A review on aging and consumer behavior," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 267-297, December.
    7. Kuppelwieser, Volker G., 2016. "Towards the use of chronological age in research – A cautionary comment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 17-22.
    8. Aimee Drolet & Patti Williams & Loraine Lau-Gesk, 2007. "Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 211-221, December.
    9. DeKay, Michael L. & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia & Fischbeck, Paul S., 2009. "Distortion of probability and outcome information in risky decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 79-92, May.
    10. Gierl, Heribert & Stiegelmayr, Karin, 2012. "Erzeugt nicht-diagnostische Information einen Reihenfolge-Effekt im Fall der attributweisen Informationspräsentation?," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(2), pages 127-152.
    11. Martine Nurek & Olga Kostopoulou & York Hagmayer, 2014. "Predecisional information distortion in physicians' diagnostic judgments: Strengthening a leading hypothesis or weakening its competitor?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(6), pages 572-585, November.
    12. Carlson, Kurt A. & Guha, Abhijit, 2011. "Leader-focused search: The impact of an emerging preference on information search," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 133-141, May.
    13. Anne-Sophie Chaxel & J. Edward Russo & Neda Kerimi, 2013. "Preference-driven biases in decision makers' information search and evaluation," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(5), pages 561-576, September.
    14. Bond, Samuel D. & Carlson, Kurt A. & Meloy, Margaret G. & Russo, J. Edward & Tanner, Robin J., 2007. "Information distortion in the evaluation of a single option," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 240-254, March.
    15. DeKay, Michael L. & Miller, Seth A. & Schley, Dan R. & Erford, Breann M., 2014. "Proleader and antitrailer information distortion and their effects on choice and postchoice memory," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 134-150.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:5:p:561-576 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Kuppelwieser, Volker G. & Sarstedt, Marko, 2014. "Exploring the influence of customers' time horizon perspectives on the satisfaction–loyalty link," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2620-2627.
    18. Russo, J.E. & Yong, Kevyn, 2011. "The distortion of information to support an emerging evaluation of risk," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 132-139, May.
    19. Kurt A. Carlson & Samuel D. Bond, 2006. "Improving Preference Assessment: Limiting the Effect of Context Through Pre-exposure to Attribute Levels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 410-421, March.
    20. Katja H. Brunk & Cara Boer, 2020. "How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 443-458, January.
    21. Olga Kostopoulou & Christos Mousoulis & Brendan Delaney, 2009. "Information search and information distortion in the diagnosis of an ambiguous presentation," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(5), pages 408-418, August.
    22. Irene (Eirini) Kamenidou & Aikaterini Stavrianea & Spyridon Mamalis & Ifigeneia Mylona, 2020. "Knowledge Assessment of COVID-19 Symptoms: Gender Differences and Communication Routes for the Generation Z Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    23. Dewitte, Siegfried, 2013. "From willpower breakdown to the breakdown of the willpower model – The symmetry of self-control and impulsive behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 16-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:35-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.