IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v47y2007i1p123-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does access to tutorial solutions enhance student performance? Evidence from an accounting course

Author

Listed:
  • Reza M. Monem

Abstract

Deciding whether to release tutorial solutions to students is quite often a dilemma for instructors. This paper provides empirical evidence on the effect of releasing tutorial solutions in a management accounting course at a large Australian university. For this purpose, this paper develops a base model for predicting performance in the course and expands the model to incorporate a variable capturing the release of tutorial solutions. Consistent with previous research (e.g. Doran et al., 1991; Danko‐McGhee and Duke, 1992; Kavanagh and Rohde, 1996), in the base model, although performances in an introductory accounting course and the mid‐semester test were found to be good predictors of performance in the final examination, evidence on the role of gender and age was weak. In the expanded model, there was no evidence that releasing tutorial solutions improved performance in the final examination. The findings of this paper have policy implications for educators and administrators in education in deciding whether to release tutorial solutions to students.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza M. Monem, 2007. "Does access to tutorial solutions enhance student performance? Evidence from an accounting course," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(1), pages 123-142, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:47:y:2007:i:1:p:123-142
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00199.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00199.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00199.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. G. Drennan & F. H. Rohde, 2002. "Determinants of performance in advanced undergraduate management accounting: An empirical investigation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 42(1), pages 27-40, March.
    2. Moy Yin Koh & Hian Chye Koh, 1999. "The determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 13-29.
    3. Beverley Jackling & Alastair Anderson, 1998. "Study mode, general ability and performance in accounting: a research note," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 65-73.
    4. Neil Hartnett & Jennifer Römcke & Christine Yap, 2004. "Student performance in tertiary‐level accounting: an international student focus," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 44(2), pages 163-185, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Goldwater, Paul M., 2010. "Beyond just desserts: The gendered nature of the connection between effort and achievement for accounting students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-12.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yilmaz Guney, 2009. "Exogenous and Endogenous Factors Influencing Students' Performance in Undergraduate Accounting Modules," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 51-73.
    2. Aldónio Ferreira & Andrijani Santoso, 2008. "Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(2), pages 209-231, June.
    3. Elizabeth Gammie & Brenda Paver & Bob Gammie & Fiona Duncan, 2003. "Gender differences in accounting education: an undergraduate exploration," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 177-196.
    4. McPhail, Ken & Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2010. "Class, social deprivation and accounting education in Scottish schools: Implications for the reproduction of the accounting profession and practice," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 31-50.
    5. Jamie Alcock & Sophie Cockcroft & Frank Finn, 2008. "Quantifying the advantage of secondary mathematics study for accounting and finance undergraduates," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(5), pages 697-718, December.
    6. Ahmet Onay* & Serdar Benligiray, 2018. "Internal Factors Affecting Student Performance in Accounting Courses at a Vocational School," Sumerianz Journal of Economics and Finance, Sumerianz Publication, vol. 1(3), pages 82-90, 09-2018.
    7. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.
    8. Tracey Mcdowall & Beverley Jackling, 2006. "The Impact of Computer-Assisted Learning on Academic Grades: An Assessment of Students' Perceptions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 377-389.
    9. Elizabeth Gammie & Bob Gammie & Fiona Duncan, 2001. "The development, implementation and operation of an undergraduate distance learning module in auditing: a teaching note," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 403-412.
    10. Bernadette Smith & William Maguire & Helen Haijuan Han, 2018. "Generic skills in accounting: perspectives of Chinese postgraduate students," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 535-559, June.
    11. Norlaila Mazura Hj. Mohaiyadin & Masdiah Abdul Hamid, 2013. "Assessment Method (AM), English Communication and Language (ENG) and Pre-Requisite Knowledge of Student (PRE): A Comparative Study Among Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN) Accounting Students," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(9), pages 1863-1877, September.
    12. Neal Arthur & Patricia Everaert, 2012. "Gender and Performance in Accounting Examinations: Exploring the Impact of Examination Format," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 471-487, October.
    13. Angus Duff, 2004. "Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 409-430.
    14. Marann Byrne & Barbara Flood & Pauline Willis, 2002. "The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 27-42.
    15. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Goldwater, Paul M., 2010. "Beyond just desserts: The gendered nature of the connection between effort and achievement for accounting students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-12.
    16. Paul Wells & Paul De Lange & Peter Fieger, 2008. "Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second‐year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 503-518, September.
    17. Andrew Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2003. "Factors explaining the choice of a finance major: the role of students' characteristics, personality and perceptions of the profession," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21.
    18. Montagud Mascarell, M. Dolores & Gandía Cabedo, Juan L., 2014. "Entorno virtual de aprendizaje y resultados académicos: evidencia empírica para la enseñanza de la Contabilidad de Gestión," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 108-115.
    19. Jackson, Mark, 2014. "Accounting “Boot Camp”," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-97.
    20. Janik Ole Wecks & Johannes Voshaar & Benedikt Jost Plate & Jochen Zimmermann, 2024. "Generative AI Usage and Exam Performance," Papers 2404.19699, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:47:y:2007:i:1:p:123-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.