IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v99y2008i8p1681-1697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Hae-Ryoung
  • Fuentes, Montserrat
  • Ghosh, Sujit

Abstract

Gaussian geostatistical models (GGMs) and Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRFs) are two distinct approaches commonly used in spatial models for modeling point-referenced and areal data, respectively. In this paper, the relations between GGMs and GMRFs are explored based on approximations of GMRFs by GGMs, and approximations of GGMs by GMRFs. Two new metrics of approximation are proposed : (i) the Kullback-Leibler discrepancy of spectral densities and (ii) the chi-squared distance between spectral densities. The distances between the spectral density functions of GGMs and GMRFs measured by these metrics are minimized to obtain the approximations of GGMs and GMRFs. The proposed methodologies are validated through several empirical studies. We compare the performance of our approach to other methods based on covariance functions, in terms of the average mean squared prediction error and also the computational time. A spatial analysis of a dataset on PM2.5 collected in California is presented to illustrate the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Hae-Ryoung & Fuentes, Montserrat & Ghosh, Sujit, 2008. "A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(8), pages 1681-1697, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:99:y:2008:i:8:p:1681-1697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-259X(08)00025-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel A. Griffith & Ferenc Csillag, 1993. "Exploring Relationships Between Semi‐Variogram And Spatial Autoregressive Models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 283-295, July.
    2. Julian Besag & Jeremy York & Annie Mollié, 1991. "Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 43(1), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Montserrat Fuentes & Hae-Ryoung Song & Sujit K. Ghosh & David M. Holland & Jerry M. Davis, 2006. "Spatial Association between Speciated Fine Particles and Mortality," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 855-863, September.
    4. Hååvard Rue & Hååkon Tjelmeland, 2002. "Fitting Gaussian Markov Random Fields to Gaussian Fields," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 29(1), pages 31-49, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verzelen, Nicolas, 2010. "Data-driven neighborhood selection of a Gaussian field," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 1355-1371, May.
    2. Herbei, Radu & Berry Lyons, W. & Laybourn-Parry, Johanna & Gardner, Christopher & Priscu, John C. & McKnight, Diane M., 2010. "Physiochemical properties influencing biomass abundance and primary production in Lake Hoare, Antarctica," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1184-1193.
    3. I. Gede Nyoman Mindra Jaya & Henk Folmer, 2022. "Spatiotemporal high-resolution prediction and mapping: methodology and application to dengue disease," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 527-581, October.
    4. Bolin, David & Lindgren, Finn, 2013. "A comparison between Markov approximations and other methods for large spatial data sets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 7-21.
    5. White, Gentry & Ghosh, Sujit K., 2009. "A stochastic neighborhood conditional autoregressive model for spatial data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3033-3046, June.
    6. Angela Ferretti & L. Ippoliti & P. Valentini & R. J. Bhansali, 2023. "Long memory conditional random fields on regular lattices," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Håvard Rue & Ingelin Steinsland & Sveinung Erland, 2004. "Approximating hidden Gaussian Markov random fields," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 877-892, November.
    2. Ying C. MacNab, 2018. "Rejoinder on: Some recent work on multivariate Gaussian Markov random fields," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 554-569, September.
    3. Vinicius Mayrink & Dani Gamerman, 2009. "On computational aspects of Bayesian spatial models: influence of the neighboring structure in the efficiency of MCMC algorithms," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 641-669, December.
    4. Choi, Jungsoon & Fuentes, Montserrat & Reich, Brian J., 2009. "Spatial-temporal association between fine particulate matter and daily mortality," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2989-3000, June.
    5. Sandy Burden & Noel Cressie & David G. Steel, 2015. "The SAR Model for Very Large Datasets: A Reduced Rank Approach," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Katherine Wilson & Jon Wakefield, 2022. "A probabilistic model for analyzing summary birth history data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(11), pages 291-344.
    7. Eibich, Peter & Ziebarth, Nicolas, 2014. "Examining the Structure of Spatial Health Effects in Germany Using Hierarchical Bayes Models," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49, pages 305-320.
    8. Shreosi Sanyal & Thierry Rochereau & Cara Nichole Maesano & Laure Com-Ruelle & Isabella Annesi-Maesano, 2018. "Long-Term Effect of Outdoor Air Pollution on Mortality and Morbidity: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study for Metropolitan France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-8, November.
    9. Mayer Alvo & Jingrui Mu, 2023. "COVID-19 Data Analysis Using Bayesian Models and Nonparametric Geostatistical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Gil, Guilherme Dôco Roberti & Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes, Ana Lúcia Miranda & Mayrink, Vinícius Diniz, 2017. "Spatial statistical methods applied to the 2015 Brazilian energy distribution benchmarking model: Accounting for unobserved determinants of inefficiencies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 373-383.
    11. Vanessa Santos-Sánchez & Juan Antonio Córdoba-Doña & Javier García-Pérez & Antonio Escolar-Pujolar & Lucia Pozzi & Rebeca Ramis, 2020. "Cancer Mortality and Deprivation in the Proximity of Polluting Industrial Facilities in an Industrial Region of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Berti, Patrizia & Dreassi, Emanuela & Rigo, Pietro, 2014. "Compatibility results for conditional distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 190-203.
    13. Louise Choo & Stephen G. Walker, 2008. "A new approach to investigating spatial variations of disease," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(2), pages 395-405, April.
    14. Young‐Geun Choi & Lawrence P. Hanrahan & Derek Norton & Ying‐Qi Zhao, 2022. "Simultaneous spatial smoothing and outlier detection using penalized regression, with application to childhood obesity surveillance from electronic health records," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 324-336, March.
    15. Zhengyi Zhou & David S. Matteson & Dawn B. Woodard & Shane G. Henderson & Athanasios C. Micheas, 2015. "A Spatio-Temporal Point Process Model for Ambulance Demand," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 6-15, March.
    16. Eric C. Tassone & Marie Lynn Miranda & Alan E. Gelfand, 2010. "Disaggregated spatial modelling for areal unit categorical data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(1), pages 175-190, January.
    17. Junming Li & Xiulan Han & Xiao Li & Jianping Yang & Xuejiao Li, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Ground Monitored PM 2.5 Concentrations in China in Recent Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Debashis Mondal & Teng Yin, 2017. "Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling in Bayesian empirical likelihood computation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 293-320, January.
    19. Dolores Catelan & Annibale Biggeri & Corrado Lagazio, 2009. "On the clustering term in ecological analysis: how do different prior specifications affect results?," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 18(1), pages 49-61, March.
    20. Massimo Bilancia & Giacomo Demarinis, 2014. "Bayesian scanning of spatial disease rates with integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA)," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 23(1), pages 71-94, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    91B76 86A32 62H11 91D72 60J20;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:99:y:2008:i:8:p:1681-1697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.