IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v93y2024ics0047235224000497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reform, defund or do not touch? Exploring factors affecting the demand for organizational change in law enforcement

Author

Listed:
  • Guler, Ahmet
  • Onat, Ismail

Abstract

The present study examined the corelates of individuals` varying attitudes towards reforming American law enforcement. Building on previous research, we hypothesized that such demand among American adults may result from their fear of police brutality, the quality of relationship between the police and minorities, the role of media news, political views, and other demographic factors. Three concepts (i.e., reforming the police, defunding the police, or maintaining the status quo) were employed to measure reform attitudes. Analyses of survey data indicated that the three proposals do not have identical predictors. While fear of police brutality and political views were significant predictors of all three attitudes across the models, with opposing effects on maintaining the status quo, belonging to a minority group and exposure to news media had no significant effect on support for defunding or reforming the police. The results of the study were discussed, and its policy implications were considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Guler, Ahmet & Onat, Ismail, 2024. "Reform, defund or do not touch? Exploring factors affecting the demand for organizational change in law enforcement," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s0047235224000497
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224000497
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriel L Schwartz & Jaquelyn L Jahn, 2020. "Mapping fatal police violence across U.S. metropolitan areas: Overall rates and racial/ethnic inequities, 2013-2017," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Pyrooz, David C. & Decker, Scott H. & Wolfe, Scott E. & Shjarback, John A., 2016. "Was there a Ferguson Effect on crime rates in large U.S. cities?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-8.
    3. Bolger, Michelle A. & Lytle, Daniel J. & Bolger, P. Colin, 2021. "What matters in citizen satisfaction with police: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Iselin, Anne-Marie R. & Gallucci, Marcello & DeCoster, Jamie, 2013. "Reconciling questions about dichotomizing variables in criminal justice research," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 386-394.
    5. Buckler, Kevin & Unnever, James D., 2008. "Racial and ethnic perceptions of injustice: Testing the core hypotheses of comparative conflict theory," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 270-278, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Culhane, Scott E. & Wiser, Jessie L., 2024. "Juvenile fatalities in law enforcement encounters," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Christopher M. Sullivan & Zachary P. O’Keeffe, 2017. "Evidence that curtailing proactive policing can reduce major crime," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(10), pages 730-737, October.
    3. Evelyn Skoy, 2021. "Black Lives Matter Protests, Fatal Police Interactions, And Crime," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 280-291, April.
    4. Tanaya Devi & Roland G. Fryer Jr, 2020. "Policing the Police: The Impact of "Pattern-or-Practice" Investigations on Crime," NBER Working Papers 27324, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Jennings, Wesley G. & Fox, Bryanna Hahn & Farrington, David P., 2014. "Inked into Crime? An Examination of the Causal Relationship between Tattoos and Life-Course Offending among Males from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 77-84.
    6. Capers, Marshae & Chamberlain, Jillian & Cline, Jordan & Metcalfe, Christi & Murphy, Akili, 2024. "Beyond George Floyd: Assessing sentiments on police fund reallocation and its intersection with race and racial resentment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Crifasi, Cassandra K. & Williams, Rebecca G. & Booty, Marisa D. & Owens-Young, Jessica L. & Webster, Daniel W. & Buggs, Shani A.L., 2022. "Community perspectives on gun violence and safety: The role of policing in Baltimore City," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Davenport-Klunder, Katelyn & Hine, Kelly & McKillop, Nadine, 2024. "Anger, fear, and frozenness: Exploring the emotive aspect of anti-police sentiment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Sutherland, Alex & Ariel, Barak & Farrar, William & De Anda, Randy, 2017. "Post-experimental follow-ups—Fade-out versus persistence effects: The Rialto police body-worn camera experiment four years on," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 110-116.
    10. Corrado, Raymond R. & DeLisi, Matt & Hart, Stephen D. & McCuish, Evan C., 2015. "Can the causal mechanisms underlying chronic, serious, and violent offending trajectories be elucidated using the psychopathy construct?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 251-261.
    11. Nix, Justin & Pickett, Justin T., 2017. "Third-person perceptions, hostile media effects, and policing: Developing a theoretical framework for assessing the Ferguson effect," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 24-33.
    12. Winegard, Benjamin M. & Winegard, Bo M., 2018. "The emerging science of evolutionary criminology," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 122-126.
    13. Barry Markovsky & Kimmo Eriksson, 2012. "Comparing Direct and Indirect Measures of Just Rewards," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(1), pages 199-216, February.
    14. Michael Mathura, 2022. "Exploring Citizens Perception of the Police Role and Function in a Post-Colonial Nation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Quinn, Katherine G. & Edwards, Travonne & Johnson, Anthony & Takahashi, Lois & Dakin, Andrea & Bouacha, Nora & Voisin, Dexter, 2023. "Understanding the impact of police brutality on Black sexually minoritized men," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    16. Soheil Sabriseilabi & James Williams & Mahmoud Sadri, 2022. "How Does Race Moderate the Effect of Religion Dimensions on Attitudes toward the Death Penalty?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, April.
    17. Ana Isabel Sani & Vanessa Azevedo & Daniela Paulo & Mariana Magalhães & Laura M. Nunes, 2022. "Satisfaction with the Police: Perceptions and Related Variables from an Urban Community Sample," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Desmond Ang & Panka Bencsik & Jesse Bruhn & Ellora Derenoncourt, 2021. "Police violence reduces civilian cooperation and engagement with law enforcement," Working Papers 2021-005, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    19. Ferdik, Frank & Frogge, George & Cooney, Mikaela, 2022. "Exploring further determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The role of strain," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Moule, Richard K., 2020. "Under siege?: Assessing public perceptions of the “War on Police”," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s0047235224000497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.