IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v89y2023ics0047235223000910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public assessments of the criminal justice system in addressing mental health

Author

Listed:
  • Mancini, Christina
  • Metcalfe, Christi

Abstract

Given the link between public opinion and governmental accountability, it is important to understand public attitudes toward mental health outreach in the criminal justice system. This need is especially evident in the wake of highly publicized incidents involving distressed individuals and the justice system. Specifically, how did the public rate the police and the criminal justice system (CJS) in responding to mental health crises one year-post George Floyd's murder (2021)—a pivotal period in which accounts of police misconduct and justice system failures were highly featured by the media? What factors—broader judgements of the legal system, crime-related perceptions, fear of the police, concern about racial injustice, prior mental health history—are associated with these ratings? Drawing on a 2021 national poll, this study examines these research questions. Results suggest varying levels of satisfaction with the police and CJS in the response to mental health. Additionally, divides in public attitudes are evident across theoretically relevant factors. Implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mancini, Christina & Metcalfe, Christi, 2023. "Public assessments of the criminal justice system in addressing mental health," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:89:y:2023:i:c:s0047235223000910
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235223000910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, Devon, 2008. "Racial prejudice, perceived injustice, and the Black-White gap in punitive attitudes," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 198-206, May.
    2. Bolger, Michelle A. & Lytle, Daniel J. & Bolger, P. Colin, 2021. "What matters in citizen satisfaction with police: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannan, Kellie & Cullen, Francis T. & Butler, Leah C. & Graham, Amanda & Burton, Alexander L. & Burton, Velmer S. Jr., 2020. "Racial Sympathy and Support for Capital Punishment: A Case Study in Concept Transfer," SocArXiv xybj9, Center for Open Science.
    2. Michael Mathura, 2022. "Exploring Citizens Perception of the Police Role and Function in a Post-Colonial Nation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Ana Isabel Sani & Vanessa Azevedo & Daniela Paulo & Mariana Magalhães & Laura M. Nunes, 2022. "Satisfaction with the Police: Perceptions and Related Variables from an Urban Community Sample," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Ferdik, Frank & Frogge, George & Cooney, Mikaela, 2022. "Exploring further determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The role of strain," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Behnken, Monic P. & Caudill, Jonathan W. & Berg, Mark T. & Trulson, Chad R. & DeLisi, Matt, 2011. "Marked for Death: An Empirical Criminal Careers Analysis of Death Sentences in a Sample of Convicted Male Homicide Offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 471-478.
    6. Cochran, John K. & Sanders, Beth A., 2009. "The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 525-533, November.
    7. Mears, Daniel P. & Stewart, Eric A., 2010. "Interracial contact and fear of crime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 34-41, January.
    8. George Wilson & Amie L. Nielsen, 2011. "“Color Coding†and Support for Social Policy Spending: Assessing the Parameters among Whites," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 634(1), pages 174-189, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:89:y:2023:i:c:s0047235223000910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.