IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v85y2018icp73-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A meta-analytic review of competitive aggressiveness research

Author

Listed:
  • Hughes-Morgan, Margaret
  • Kolev, Kalin
  • Mcnamara, Gerry

Abstract

Competitive aggressiveness has been at the center of competitive dynamics literature for decades, however there is no consensus as to its primary drivers and performance consequences. Thus, we present the results of a meta-analysis of the antecedents to and consequences of competitive aggressiveness using three aggressiveness components—competitive volume, complexity, and heterogeneity. Leveraging the awareness, motivation, capability framework as a guide of the drivers of competitive aggressiveness, we find that greater organizational size and age, lower slack resources and prior performance, greater market growth, lower market concentration, and more heterogeneous top management teams lead to more aggressive actions. In addition, we found that among the different components of aggressiveness competitive volume improved operating performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hughes-Morgan, Margaret & Kolev, Kalin & Mcnamara, Gerry, 2018. "A meta-analytic review of competitive aggressiveness research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-82.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:85:y:2018:i:c:p:73-82
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296317304356
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norman, Patricia M. & Artz, Kendall W. & Martinez, Richard J., 2007. "Does it pay to be different? Competitive non-conformity under different regulatory regimes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 1135-1143, November.
    2. Jerayr (John) Haleblian & Gerry McNamara & Kalin Kolev & Bernadine J. Dykes, 2012. "Exploring firm characteristics that differentiate leaders from followers in industry merger waves: a competitive dynamics perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9), pages 1037-1052, September.
    3. Sucheta Nadkarni & Tianxu Chen & Jianhong Chen, 2016. "The clock is ticking! Executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1132-1153, June.
    4. Richard A. Bettis & David Weeks, 1987. "Financial returns and strategic interaction: The case of instant photography," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(6), pages 549-563, November.
    5. Ian MacMillan & Mary Lynn McCaffery & Gilles Van Wijk, 1985. "Competitors' responses to easily imitated new products—exploring commercial banking product introductions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 75-86, January.
    6. Danny Miller & Peter H. Friesen, 1984. "A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(10), pages 1161-1183, October.
    7. Walter J. Ferrier & Cormac Mac Fhionnlaoich & Ken G. Smith & Curtis M. Grimm, 2002. "The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: a reconciliation of conflicting views," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4-5), pages 301-316.
    8. Greg Young & Ken G. Smith & Curtis M. Grimm, 1996. "“Austrian” and Industrial Organization Perspectives on Firm-level Competitive Activity and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 243-254, June.
    9. Michele Kremen Bolton, 1993. "Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 57-75, February.
    10. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Claudia Bird Schoonhoven, 1996. "Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 136-150, April.
    11. Levin, Richard C & Cohen, Wesley M & Mowery, David C, 1985. "R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 20-24, May.
    12. Don Knight & Craig L. Pearce & Ken G. Smith & Judy D. Olian & Henry P. Sims & Ken A. Smith & Patrick Flood, 1999. "Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 445-465, May.
    13. Levinthal, Daniel & March, James G., 1981. "A model of adaptive organizational search," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 307-333, December.
    14. Lenard C. Huff & William T. Robinson, 1994. "Note: The Impact of Leadtime and Years of Competitive Rivalry on Pioneer Market Share Advantages," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(10), pages 1370-1377, October.
    15. Nair, Anil & Selover, David D., 2012. "A study of competitive dynamics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 355-361.
    16. Ming-Jer Chen & Danny Miller, 2015. "Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: A multidimensional framework," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 758-775, May.
    17. Walter J. Ferrier & Douglas W. Lyon, 2004. "Competitive repertoire simplicity and firm performance: The moderating role of top management team heterogeneity," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6-7), pages 317-327.
    18. Pina, José M. & Dall'Olmo Riley, Francesca & Lomax, Wendy, 2013. "Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: A meta-analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1411-1419.
    19. Peter W. Roberts & Raphael Amit, 2003. "The Dynamics of Innovative Activity and Competitive Advantage: The Case of Australian Retail Banking, 1981 to 1995," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 107-122, April.
    20. David L. Deephouse, 1999. "To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 147-166, February.
    21. Jeffrey G. Covin & Dennis P. Slevin, 1991. "A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(1), pages 7-26, October.
    22. Violina Rindova & Walter J. Ferrier & Robert Wiltbank, 2010. "Value from gestalt: how sequences of competitive actions create advantage for firms in nascent markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1474-1497, December.
    23. Gustavo Grullon, 2004. "Advertising, Breadth of Ownership, and Liquidity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 439-461.
    24. Ming‐Jer Chen & Hao‐Chieh Lin & John G. Michel, 2010. "Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: the roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1410-1430, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Nadia Postorino & Giuseppe M. L. Sarnè, 2023. "Using Reputation Scores to Foster Car-Sharing Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Mackey, Jeremy D. & Parker Ellen, B. & McAllister, Charn P. & Alexander, Katherine C., 2021. "The dark side of leadership: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 705-718.
    3. Jaeyoung Cho, 2024. "Thriving in the global competitive landscape: competitive dynamics and longevity of emerging market firms," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 82-109, February.
    4. Nawal Chemma, 2021. "Disruptive innovation in a dynamic environment: a winning strategy? An illustration through the analysis of the yoghurt industry in Algeria," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Weinzimmer, Laurence & Esken, Candace A. & Michel, Eric J. & McDowell, William C. & Mahto, Raj V., 2023. "The differential impact of strategic aggressiveness on firm performance: The role of firm size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Mackey, Jeremy D., 2021. "Why and how predators pick prey: Followers’ personality and performance as predictors of destructive leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 159-169.
    7. T V Arun Kumar & K S Manikandan, 2024. "Business group affiliation and competitive repertoire," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 477-505, June.
    8. Dykes, Bernadine J. & Kolev, Kalin D., 2018. "Entry Timing in Foreign Markets: A Meta-analytic Review and Critique," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 404-416.
    9. Diestre, Luis & Lumineau, Fabrice & Durand, Rodolphe, 2023. "Litigate or let it go? Multi-market contact and IP infringement-litigation dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Wei & Meyer, Klaus E., 2020. "How do local and foreign firms compete? Competitive actions in an emerging economy," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    2. Weinzimmer, Laurence & Esken, Candace A. & Michel, Eric J. & McDowell, William C. & Mahto, Raj V., 2023. "The differential impact of strategic aggressiveness on firm performance: The role of firm size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Yang, Wei & Meyer, Klaus E., 2019. "How does ownership influence business growth? A competitive dynamics perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    4. Dmitry Sharapov & Jan‐Michael Ross, 2023. "Whom should a leader imitate? Using rivalry‐based imitation to manage strategic risk in changing environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 311-342, January.
    5. Jaeyoung Cho, 2024. "Thriving in the global competitive landscape: competitive dynamics and longevity of emerging market firms," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 82-109, February.
    6. Carla D. Jones & Phillip M. Jolly & Connor J. Lubojacky & Geoffrey P. Martin & Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, 2019. "Behavioral agency and corporate entrepreneurship: CEO equity incentives & competitive behavior," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1017-1039, September.
    7. Claudio Giachetti, 2013. "Competitive Aggressiveness and Performance of Developed Country-Based Firms in the Chinese Emerging Economy: The Moderating Effect of Institutional Voids and Entry Mode Degree of Control," Working Papers 1, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    8. Chih-Yi, Su & Bou-Wen, Lin, 2021. "Attack and defense in patent-based competition: A new paradigm of strategic decision-making in the era of the fourth industrial revolution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Yasar Mehmet & Gerede Ender, 2020. "Identification of factors affecting competitive tension in the domestic air transport market in Turkey," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(2), pages 118-139, June.
    10. Krzysztof Borodako & Jadwiga Berbeka & Michał Rudnicki, 2021. "Innovation Orientation in Business Services," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19897.
    11. Christian Hofer & Jordan M. Barker & Laura D'Oria & Jonathan L. Johnson, 2022. "Broadening our understanding of interfirm rivalry: A call for research on how supply networks shape competitive behavior and performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 8-25, April.
    12. Lin, Hao-Chieh & Lin, Pei-Chun, 2019. "The interplay between CEO-TMT exchange level and differentiation: Implications for firm competitive behaviors and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 171-181.
    13. Yasar Mehmet & Gerede Ender, 2020. "Identification of factors affecting competitive tension in the domestic air transport market in Turkey," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(2), pages 118-139, June.
    14. Zucchini, Leon & Kretschmer, Tobias, 2011. "Competitive Pressure: Competitive Dynamics as Reactions to Multiple Rivals," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 12308, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    15. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & Eric Yanfei Zhao & Greg Fisher & Michael Lounsbury & Danny Miller, 2017. "Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 93-113, January.
    16. Kimberly A. Whitler & Ben Lee & Ryan Krause & Neil A. Morgan, 2021. "Upper echelons research in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 198-219, January.
    17. He, Jinyu & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2006. "Firm Capability, Corporate Governance, and Firm Competitive Behavior: A Multi-theoretic Framework," Working Papers 06-0103, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    18. Mariadoss, Babu John & Johnson, Jean L. & Martin, Kelly D., 2014. "Strategic intent and performance: The role of resource allocation decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2393-2402.
    19. Jie Wu & Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Siah Hwee Ang & Zefu Wu, 2019. "The impact of imitation strategy and R&D resources on incremental and radical innovation: evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 210-230, February.
    20. Claudio Giachetti, 2016. "Competing in Emerging Markets: Performance Implications of Competitive Aggressiveness," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 325-352, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:85:y:2018:i:c:p:73-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.