IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v172y2024ics0148296323008159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How reviews influence product usage post-purchase: An examination of video game playtime

Author

Listed:
  • Philp, Matthew
  • Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal

Abstract

Previous research on software products, such as video games, has largely focused on how user experience elements like visuals, audio, and content impact consumer engagement. However, these elements are internal factors controlled by the firm. It is equally important to identify and understand how external factors can influence usage and engagement. This study investigates the role of product reviews as an external factor that can shape post-purchase usage behavior for video games. We analyze data from the field and conduct two experiments to explore how reviews affect current owners' usage intentions and playtime. Our results suggest that negative reviews can decrease usage among current owners, in part due to concerns about appearing as an incompetent consumer. These findings highlight the power of product reviews beyond their intended audience of prospective buyers and offer implications for theory and firms alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Philp, Matthew & Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal, 2024. "How reviews influence product usage post-purchase: An examination of video game playtime," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:172:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323008159
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323008159
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer J. Argo & Darren W. Dahl & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2005. "The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 207-212, September.
    2. Jennifer J. Argo & Katherine White & Darren W. Dahl, 2006. "Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 99-108, June.
    3. Matthew Philp & Martin A. Pyle & Laurence Ashworth, 2018. "Risking the self: the impact of self-esteem on negative word-of-mouth behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 101-113, March.
    4. David Godes & Dina Mayzlin, 2009. "Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 721-739, 07-08.
    5. Eugene W. Anderson & Mary W. Sullivan, 1993. "The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 125-143.
    6. Philp, Matthew & Ashworth, Laurence, 2020. "I should have known better!: When firm-caused failure leads to self-image concerns and reduces negative word-of-mouth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 283-293.
    7. Mansoor Javed & Sanjit Roy & Bano Mansoor, 2015. "Will You Defend Your Loved Brand?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Marc Fetscherin & Tobias Heilmann (ed.), Consumer Brand Relationships, chapter 2, pages 31-54, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Yi Zhao & Sha Yang & Vishal Narayan & Ying Zhao, 2013. "Modeling Consumer Learning from Online Product Reviews," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 153-169, May.
    9. Delre, Sebastiano A. & Luffarelli, Jonathan, 2023. "Consumer reviews and product life cycle: On the temporal dynamics of electronic word of mouth on movie box office," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Philp, Matthew & Jacobson, Jenna & Pancer, Ethan, 2022. "Predicting social media engagement with computer vision: An examination of food marketing on Instagram," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 736-747.
    11. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Wiertz, Caroline, 2017. "Not all digital word of mouth is created equal: Understanding the respective impact of consumer reviews and microblogs on new product success," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 336-354.
    12. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    13. Xueming Luo, 2009. "Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Cash Flows and Stock Prices," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 148-165, 01-02.
    14. Chernev, Alexander, 2001. "The Impact of Common Features on Consumer Preferences: A Case of Confirmatory Reasoning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(4), pages 475-488, March.
    15. David A. Reinstein & Christopher M. Snyder, 2005. "The Influence Of Expert Reviews On Consumer Demand For Experience Goods: A Case Study Of Movie Critics," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 27-51, March.
    16. Yinlong Zhang & Lawrence Feick & Vikas Mittal, 2014. "How Males and Females Differ in Their Likelihood of Transmitting Negative Word of Mouth," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(6), pages 1097-1108.
    17. Jennifer J. Argo & Kelley J. Main, 2008. "Stigma by Association in Coupon Redemption: Looking Cheap because of Others," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(4), pages 559-572, July.
    18. Fullerton, Gordon, 2011. "Creating advocates: The roles of satisfaction, trust and commitment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 92-100.
    19. Kyoungmi Lee & Hakkyun Kim & Kathleen D. Vohs, 2011. "Stereotype Threat in the Marketplace: Consumer Anxiety and Purchase Intentions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(2), pages 343-357.
    20. Su, Lujun & Swanson, Scott R. & Chinchanachokchai, Sydney & Hsu, Maxwell K. & Chen, Xiaohong, 2016. "Reputation and intentions: The role of satisfaction, identification, and commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3261-3269.
    21. Kim, Ho & Hanssens, Dominique M., 2017. "Advertising and Word-of-Mouth Effects on Pre-launch Consumer Interest and Initial Sales of Experience Products," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 57-74.
    22. Russell-Bennett, Rebekah & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Coote, Leonard V., 2007. "Involvement, satisfaction, and brand loyalty in a small business services setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 1253-1260, December.
    23. Kos Koklic, Mateja & Kukar-Kinney, Monika & Vegelj, Spela, 2017. "An investigation of customer satisfaction with low-cost and full-service airline companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 188-196.
    24. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Shyam Gopinath & Sriram Venkataraman, 2010. "The Effects of Online User Reviews on Movie Box Office Performance: Accounting for Sequential Rollout and Aggregation Across Local Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 944-957, 09-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philp, Matthew & Ashworth, Laurence, 2020. "I should have known better!: When firm-caused failure leads to self-image concerns and reduces negative word-of-mouth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 283-293.
    2. Philp, Matthew & Pyle, Martin A., 2021. "The “easy win” preference: Negative consumption experiences, incompetence, and the influence on subsequent unrelated loyalty behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Tingting Song & Jinghua Huang & Yong Tan & Yifan Yu, 2019. "Using User- and Marketer-Generated Content for Box Office Revenue Prediction: Differences Between Microblogging and Third-Party Platforms," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 191-203, March.
    4. Carlson, Keith & Kopalle, Praveen K. & Riddell, Allen & Rockmore, Daniel & Vana, Prasad, 2023. "Complementing human effort in online reviews: A deep learning approach to automatic content generation and review synthesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 54-74.
    5. Sara Hanson & Hong Yuan, 2018. "Friends with benefits: social coupons as a strategy to enhance customers’ social empowerment," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 768-787, July.
    6. Philp, Matthew & Jacobson, Jenna & Pancer, Ethan, 2022. "Predicting social media engagement with computer vision: An examination of food marketing on Instagram," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 736-747.
    7. Garrett P. Sonnier & Leigh McAlister & Oliver J. Rutz, 2011. "A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Online Communications on Firm Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 702-716, July.
    8. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    9. Zhang, Mingyue & Zhao, Haichuan & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2022. "How much is a picture worth? Online review picture background and its impact on purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 134-144.
    10. Dalman, M. Deniz & Chatterjee, Subimal & Min, Junhong, 2020. "Negative word of mouth for a failed innovation from higher/lower equity brands: Moderating roles of opinion leadership and consumer testimonials," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Jake Hoskins & Shyam Gopinath & J. Cameron Verhaal & Elham Yazdani, 2021. "The influence of the online community, professional critics, and location similarity on review ratings for niche and mainstream brands," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1065-1087, November.
    12. Didem Kurt & Francesca Gino, 2023. "Income inequality and consumer preference for private labels versus national brands," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 463-479, March.
    13. Gensler, Sonja & Völckner, Franziska & Liu-Thompkins, Yuping & Wiertz, Caroline, 2013. "Managing Brands in the Social Media Environment," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 242-256.
    14. Marios Kokkodis & Theodoros Lappas & Gerald C. Kane, 2022. "Optional purchase verification in e‐commerce platforms: More representative product ratings and higher quality reviews," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2943-2961, July.
    15. Jordi McKenzie, 2023. "The economics of movies (revisited): A survey of recent literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 480-525, April.
    16. Jung Ah Han & Elea McDonnell Feit & Shuba Srinivasan, 2020. "Can negative buzz increase awareness and purchase intent?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 89-104, March.
    17. Khim-Yong Goh & Cheng-Suang Heng & Zhijie Lin, 2013. "Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 88-107, March.
    18. de Oña, Juan, 2020. "The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 296-318.
    19. Tirunillai, S. & Tellis, G.J., 2011. "Does Online Chatter Really Matter? Dynamics of User-Generated Content and Stock Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management 25817, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Antioco, Michael & Coussement, Kristof, 2018. "Misreading of consumer dissatisfaction in online product reviews: Writing style as a cause for bias," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 301-310.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:172:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323008159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.