IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v153y2022icp341-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What consumers think about product self-assembly: Insights from big data

Author

Listed:
  • Safi, Roozmehr

Abstract

As e-commerce expands rapidly from small inexpensive products to major ones, more sellers design and deliver their products as unassembled, compact kits to make logistics more efficient and cost effective. While sensible from an operation’s perspective, this practice inadvertently shifts often significant amounts of assembly work to consumers. Drawing on the literatures of product co-creation and consumer satisfaction, this study investigates various effects of this practice on buyers. Results, obtained from the analysis of consumers’ online reviews, show that the ease of assembly is a significant determinant of satisfaction with and recommendation of products. Results also indicate that, as an experience product attribute that cannot be assessed pre-purchase, assembly work is a major source of consumer concern and discontent. On the other hand, findings show a positive relationship between the volume (but not the complexity) of consumer assembly work and their sense of value for money from their purchase.

Suggested Citation

  • Safi, Roozmehr, 2022. "What consumers think about product self-assembly: Insights from big data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 341-354.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:153:y:2022:i:c:p:341-354
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322006865
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bingley, Paul & Walker, Ian, 1997. "The Labour Supply, Unemployment and Participation of Lone Mothers in In-Work Transfer Programmes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(444), pages 1375-1390, September.
    2. Chong, Alberto & Restrepo, Pascual, 2017. "Regulatory protective measures and risky behavior: Evidence from ice hockey," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    4. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    5. Bart de Langhe & Philip M. Fernbach & Donald R. Lichtenstein, 2016. "Navigating by the Stars: Investigating the Actual and Perceived Validity of Online User Ratings," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(6), pages 817-833.
    6. Abbie Griffin & John R. Hauser, 1993. "The Voice of the Customer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27.
    7. Sugathan, Praveen & Ranjan, Kumar Rakesh, 2020. "When co-production fails: The role of customer’s internal attributions and impression management concerns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 535-548.
    8. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri & Henderson, Austin, 2018. "Experimental methods: Measuring effort in economics experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 74-87.
    9. Nikolaus Franke & Martin Schreier, 2008. "Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 93-107, June.
    10. Garnier, Marion & Poncin, Ingrid, 2019. "Do enriched digital catalogues offer compelling experiences, beyond websites? A comparative analysis through the IKEA case," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 361-369.
    11. Nelson, Phillip, 1970. "Information and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(2), pages 311-329, March-Apr.
    12. Mochon, Daniel & Norton, Michael I. & Ariely, Dan, 2012. "Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 363-369.
    13. Sven Baehre & Michele O’Dwyer & Lisa O’Malley & Nick Lee, 2022. "The use of Net Promoter Score (NPS) to predict sales growth: insights from an empirical investigation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 67-84, January.
    14. Kumar Rakesh Ranjan & Stuart Read, 2016. "Value co-creation: concept and measurement," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 290-315, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annika Wiecek & Daniel Wentzel & Aras Erkin, 2020. "Just print it! The effects of self-printing a product on consumers’ product evaluations and perceived ownership," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 795-811, July.
    2. Beibei Dong & K. Sivakumar, 2017. "Customer participation in services: domain, scope, and boundaries," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 944-965, November.
    3. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Devi, Rita & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Assessing co-creation based competitive advantage through consumers’ need for differentiation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    5. Ashtiani, Amin Zokaei & Rieger, Marc Oliver & Stutz, David, 2021. "Nudging against panic selling: Making use of the IKEA effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    6. Vollstaedt, Ulrike & Imcke, Patrick & Brendel, Franziska & Ehses-Friedrich, Christiane, 2020. "Increasing consumer surplus through a novel product testing mechanism," Ruhr Economic Papers 887, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    7. Sarah Diefenbach & Svetlana Jung & Thomas Diller & Christina Franze & Stina Maciejczyk, 2018. "The Secret of Self-Made: The Potential of Different Types of Consumer Participation for Product Attachment and Commercial Value," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Avinash Malshe & Scott B. Friend, 2018. "Initiating value co-creation: Dealing with non-receptive customers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 895-920, September.
    9. Christoph Schneider & Markus Weinmann & Peter N.C. Mohr & Jan vom Brocke, 2021. "When the Stars Shine Too Bright: The Influence of Multidimensional Ratings on Online Consumer Ratings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3871-3898, June.
    10. Saulais, Laure & Massey, Camille & Perez-Cueto, Federico J.A. & Appleton, Katherine M. & Dinnella, Caterina & Monteleone, Erminio & Depezay, Laurence & Hartwell, Heather & Giboreau, Agnès, 2019. "When are “Dish of the Day” nudges most effective to increase vegetable selection?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 15-27.
    11. Pascal Güntürkün & Till Haumann & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Jan Wieseke, 2023. "How attributions of coproduction motives shape customer relationships over time," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 990-1018, September.
    12. Astrid Gamba & Anna Bottasso, 2019. "Consumer inertia in energy markets: Insights from behavioral economics," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(3), pages 113-130.
    13. Snelders, Dirk & Schoormans, Jan P. L., 2004. "An exploratory study of the relation between concrete and abstract product attributes," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 803-820, December.
    14. Zhang, Xubing & Cao, Yong, 2014. "Selling Vertically Differentiated Products under One Roof or Two? A Signaling Model of a Retailer's Roof Policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(4), pages 538-551.
    15. Henrik Cronqvist, 2005. "Advertising and Portfolio Choice," CeRP Working Papers 44, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin (Italy).
    16. Sohier, Alice & Sohier, Romain & Chaney, Damien, 2023. "When volunteers are also consumers: Exploring volunteers’ co-consumption experience in leisure contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Ranftl, Simone & Lurger, Brigitta & Brohmer, Hilmar & Athenstaedt, Ursula, 2022. "The Consumer Option Model for Withdrawal Rights in the EU: Analysis of an Alternative Design," American Journal of Trade and Policy, Asian Business Consortium, vol. 9(1), pages 23-42.
    18. Sven Hoeppner, 2014. "The unintended consequence of doorstep consumer protection: surprise, reciprocation, and consistency," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 247-276, October.
    19. Manela Karunadasa & Katri K. Sieberg & Toni Tapani Kristian Jantunen, 2023. "Payment Systems, Supplier-Induced Demand, and Service Quality in Credence Goods: Results from a Laboratory Experiment," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-31, May.
    20. Hauschultz, Frederik Plum & Munk-Nielsen, Anders, 2020. "Markups on Drop-Downs: Prominence in Pharmaceutical Markets∗," MPRA Paper 104582, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:153:y:2022:i:c:p:341-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.