IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v142y2022icp1026-1037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boiling frogs: Reconsidering the impact of deviance targets, severity, and frequency in teams

Author

Listed:
  • Baur, John E.
  • Bradley, Bret H.
  • Bonner, Robert L.

Abstract

Deviance can impact team performance but it is unclear how this process unfolds. Common measures delineate between interpersonal and organizational deviance rather than considering the impact felt by teammates. Instead, we categorize deviant acts into team-relevant and team-irrelevant measures. We then consider how deviance severity and frequency impact affective states and team performance. Guided by affective events theory’s focus on work events shaping emotional reactions and subsequent behaviors, we suggest that deviant acts that are negative work events increase negative affect and harm team performance, particularly when frequent. Team-irrelevant deviance is not a negative work event and thus should not impact team affect or performance. Within team-relevant deviance, because severe forms are objectively wrong and punished severely, teammates can overcome them whereas subtle and clandestine minor forms harm the team the most, especially when frequent. Support was found within 1114 recorded deviant acts from 435 employees in 114 organizational teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Baur, John E. & Bradley, Bret H. & Bonner, Robert L., 2022. "Boiling frogs: Reconsidering the impact of deviance targets, severity, and frequency in teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1026-1037.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:1026-1037
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322000479
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoo, Jaewon (Jay) & Flaherty, Karen & Frankwick, Gary L., 2014. "The effect of communication practice on deviance among Korean salespeople: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1991-1999.
    2. Hsieh, Hui-Hsien & Wang, Yau-De, 2016. "Linking perceived ethical climate to organizational deviance: The cognitive, affective, and attitudinal mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3600-3608.
    3. Yoav Vardi & Yoash Wiener, 1996. "Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 151-165, April.
    4. Porath, Christine L. & Erez, Amir, 2009. "Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers' performance on routine and creative tasks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 29-44, May.
    5. Ambrose, Maureen L. & Seabright, Mark A. & Schminke, Marshall, 2002. "Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 947-965, September.
    6. Anne Davis & Hannah Rothstein, 2006. "The Effects of the Perceived Behavioral Integrity of Managers on Employee Attitudes: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 407-419, September.
    7. Mulki, Jay Prakash & Jaramillo, Fernando & Locander, William B., 2006. "Emotional exhaustion and organizational deviance: Can the right job and a leader's style make a difference?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(12), pages 1222-1230, November.
    8. Kelly, Janice R. & Barsade, Sigal G., 2001. "Mood and Emotions in Small Groups and Work Teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 99-130, September.
    9. Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2019. "Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 10-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Chang & Chang, Victor & Scuotto, Veronica & Shi, Yujie & Paoloni, Niccolò, 2021. "The social-psychological approach in understanding knowledge hiding within international R&D teams: An inductive analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 799-811.
    2. Stea, Diego & Foss, Nicolai J. & Christensen, Peter Holdt, 2015. "Physical separation in the workplace: Separation cues, separation awareness, and employee motivation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 462-471.
    3. Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2019. "Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 10-19.
    4. Siachou, Evangelia & Trichina, Eleni & Papasolomou, Ioanna & Sakka, Georgia, 2021. "Why do employees hide their knowledge and what are the consequences? A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 195-213.
    5. Abhijeet K. Vadera & Michael G. Pratt, 2013. "Love, Hate, Ambivalence, or Indifference? A Conceptual Examination of Workplace Crimes and Organizational Identification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 172-188, February.
    6. Katri Karjalainen & Katariina Kemppainen & Erik Raaij, 2009. "Non-Compliant Work Behaviour in Purchasing: An Exploration of Reasons Behind Maverick Buying," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 245-261, March.
    7. Seriki, Olalekan K. & Nath, Pravin & Ingene, Charles A. & Evans, Kenneth R., 2020. "How complexity impacts salesperson counterproductive behavior: The mediating role of moral disengagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 324-335.
    8. Locander, David A. & Darrat, Mahmoud A. & Babin, Barry J., 2023. "Examining the impact of salesperson orientation on creative selling, passive deviance, and organizational outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Gabi Eissa & Scott W. Lester & Ritu Gupta, 2020. "Interpersonal Deviance and Abusive Supervision: The Mediating Role of Supervisor Negative Emotions and the Moderating Role of Subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 577-594, October.
    10. S. Hansen & Bradley Alge & Michael Brown & Christine Jackson & Benjamin Dunford, 2013. "Ethical Leadership: Assessing the Value of a Multifoci Social Exchange Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 435-449, July.
    11. Daunt, Kate L. & Harris, Lloyd C., 2011. "Customers acting badly: Evidence from the hospitality industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1034-1042, October.
    12. Imran Hussain, 2024. "How Ethical Ideology Exacerbates the Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Workplace Deviance," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 53-61.
    13. Emich, Kyle J. & Vincent, Lynne C., 2020. "Shifting focus: The influence of affective diversity on team creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 24-37.
    14. Margaret M. Hinrichs & Thomas P. Seager & Sarah J. Tracy & Mark A. Hannah, 2017. "Innovation in the Knowledge Age: implications for collaborative science," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 144-155, June.
    15. van Dijke, Marius & Wildschut, Tim & Leunissen, Joost M. & Sedikides, Constantine, 2015. "Nostalgia buffers the negative impact of low procedural justice on cooperation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 15-29.
    16. Jeffrey B. Arthur, 2011. "Do HR System Characteristics Affect the Frequency of Interpersonal Deviance in Organizations? The Role of Team Autonomy and Internal Labor Market Practices," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 30-56, January.
    17. Pnina Soffer & Nesi Outmazgin & Irit Hadar & Shay Tzafrir, 2023. "Why Work Around the Process? Analyzing Workarounds Through the Lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(4), pages 369-389, August.
    18. Joseph McManus, 2021. "Emotions and Ethical Decision Making at Work: Organizational Norms, Emotional Dogs, and the Rational Tales They Tell Themselves and Others," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 153-168, February.
    19. Abdul Kadir Othman & Hazman Shah Abdullah & Jasmine Ahmad, 2009. "The Influence of Work Motivation on Emotional Intelligence and Team Effectiveness Relationship," Vision, , vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Rangapriya Kannan-Narasimhan & Barbara Lawrence, 2012. "Behavioral Integrity: How Leader Referents and Trust Matter to Workplace Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 165-178, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:1026-1037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.