IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v102y2024ics0160289623000855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Don't waste your time measuring intelligence: Further evidence for the validity of a three-minute speeded reasoning test

Author

Listed:
  • Schubert, Anna-Lena
  • Löffler, Christoph
  • Wiebel, Clara
  • Kaulhausen, Florian
  • Baudson, Tanja Gabriele

Abstract

The rise of large-scale collaborative panel studies has generated a need for fast, reliable, and valid assessments of cognitive abilities. In these studies, a detailed characterization of participants' cognitive abilities is often unnecessary, leading to the selection of tests based on convenience, duration, and feasibility. This often results in the use of abbreviated measures or proxies, potentially compromising their reliability and validity. Here we evaluate the mini-q (Baudson & Preckel, 2016), a three-minute speeded reasoning test, as a brief assessment of general cognitive abilities. The mini-q exhibited excellent reliability (0.96–0.99) and a substantial correlation with general cognitive abilities measured with a comprehensive test battery (r = 0.57; age-corrected r = 0.50), supporting its potential as a brief screening of cognitive abilities. Working memory capacity accounted for the majority (54%) of the association between test performance and general cognitive abilities, whereas individual differences in processing speed did not contribute to this relationship. Our results support the notion that the mini-q can be used as a brief, reliable, and valid assessment of general cognitive abilities. We therefore developed a computer-based version, ensuring its adaptability for large-scale panel studies. The paper- and computer-based versions demonstrated scalar measurement invariance and can therefore be used interchangeably. We provide norm data for young (18 to 30 years) and middle-aged (31 to 60 years) adults and provide recommendations for incorporating the mini-q in panel studies. Additionally, we address potential challenges stemming from language diversity, wide age ranges, and online testing in such studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Schubert, Anna-Lena & Löffler, Christoph & Wiebel, Clara & Kaulhausen, Florian & Baudson, Tanja Gabriele, 2024. "Don't waste your time measuring intelligence: Further evidence for the validity of a three-minute speeded reasoning test," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:102:y:2024:i:c:s0160289623000855
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2023.101804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000855
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chuderski, Adam, 2019. "Even a single trivial binding of information is critical for fluid intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Hilger, Kirsten & Spinath, Frank M. & Troche, Stefan & Schubert, Anna-Lena, 2022. "The biological basis of intelligence: Benchmark findings," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Scott Marek & Brenden Tervo-Clemmens & Finnegan J. Calabro & David F. Montez & Benjamin P. Kay & Alexander S. Hatoum & Meghan Rose Donohue & William Foran & Ryland L. Miller & Timothy J. Hendrickson &, 2022. "Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals," Nature, Nature, vol. 603(7902), pages 654-660, March.
    4. Frischkorn, Gidon T. & Wilhelm, Oliver & Oberauer, Klaus, 2022. "Process-oriented intelligence research: A review from the cognitive perspective," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Scott Marek & Brenden Tervo-Clemmens & Finnegan J. Calabro & David F. Montez & Benjamin P. Kay & Alexander S. Hatoum & Meghan Rose Donohue & William Foran & Ryland L. Miller & Timothy J. Hendrickson &, 2022. "Publisher Correction: Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals," Nature, Nature, vol. 605(7911), pages 11-11, May.
    6. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    7. Chloe Fawns-Ritchie & Ian J Deary, 2020. "Reliability and validity of the UK Biobank cognitive tests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bob Bramson & Sjoerd Meijer & Annelies Nuland & Ivan Toni & Karin Roelofs, 2023. "Anxious individuals shift emotion control from lateral frontal pole to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Zurrin, Riley & Wong, Samantha Tze Sum & Roes, Meighen M. & Percival, Chantal M. & Chinchani, Abhijit & Arreaza, Leo & Kusi, Mavis & Momeni, Ava & Rasheed, Maiya & Mo, Zhaoyi & Goghari, Vina M. & Wood, 2024. "Functional brain networks involved in the Raven's standard progressive matrices task and their relation to theories of fluid intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Celeste McCracken & Zahra Raisi-Estabragh & Michele Veldsman & Betty Raman & Andrea Dennis & Masud Husain & Thomas E. Nichols & Steffen E. Petersen & Stefan Neubauer, 2022. "Multi-organ imaging demonstrates the heart-brain-liver axis in UK Biobank participants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Rotem Botvinik-Nezer & Bogdan Petre & Marta Ceko & Martin A. Lindquist & Naomi P. Friedman & Tor D. Wager, 2024. "Placebo treatment affects brain systems related to affective and cognitive processes, but not nociceptive pain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Suhwan Gim & Dong Hee Lee & Sungwoo Lee & Choong-Wan Woo, 2024. "Interindividual differences in pain can be explained by fMRI, sociodemographic, and psychological factors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, December.
    6. Arielle S. Keller & Adam R. Pines & Sheila Shanmugan & Valerie J. Sydnor & Zaixu Cui & Maxwell A. Bertolero & Ran Barzilay & Aaron F. Alexander-Bloch & Nora Byington & Andrew Chen & Gregory M. Conan &, 2023. "Personalized functional brain network topography is associated with individual differences in youth cognition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Sonia Nawrocka & Hans De Witte & Margherita Pasini & Margherita Brondino, 2023. "A Person-Centered Approach to Job Insecurity: Is There a Reciprocal Relationship between the Quantitative and Qualitative Dimensions of Job Insecurity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-27, March.
    8. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Masashi Soga & Kevin J. Gaston & Yuichi Yamaura & Kiyo Kurisu & Keisuke Hanaki, 2016. "Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children’s Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
    10. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Nathaniel Oliver Iotti & Damiano Menin & Tomas Jungert, 2022. "Early Adolescents’ Motivations to Defend Victims of Cyberbullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
    12. AJ Golio, 2024. "Whose Neighborhood Now? Gentrification and Community Life in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods," Working Papers 24-29, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    13. Peter Tavel & Bibiana Jozefiakova & Peter Telicak & Jana Furstova & Michal Puza & Natalia Kascakova, 2022. "Psychometric Analysis of the Shortened Version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale on the Slovak Population (SWBS-Sk)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Allen, Jaime & Eboli, Laura & Forciniti, Carmen & Mazzulla, Gabriella & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "The role of critical incidents and involvement in transit satisfaction and loyalty," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 57-69.
    15. Christoph Dworschak, 2024. "Bias mitigation in empirical peace and conflict studies: A short primer on posttreatment variables," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(3), pages 462-476, May.
    16. Andreea-Ionela Puiu & Anca Monica Ardeleanu & Camelia Cojocaru & Anca Bratu, 2021. "Exploring the Effect of Status Quo, Innovativeness, and Involvement Tendencies on Luxury Fashion Innovations: The Mediation Role of Status Consumption," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Slupphaug, KJell & Mehmetoglu, Mehmet & Mittner, Matthias, 2024. "modsem: An R package for estimating latent interactions and quadratic effects," OSF Preprints h3rpw, Center for Open Science.
    18. Andres Trujillo-Barrera & Joost M. E. Pennings & Dianne Hofenk, 2016. "Understanding producers' motives for adopting sustainable practices: the role of expected rewards, risk perception and risk tolerance," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(3), pages 359-382.
    19. Daria J. Kuss & Lydia Harkin & Eiman Kanjo & Joel Billieux, 2018. "Problematic Smartphone Use: Investigating Contemporary Experiences Using a Convergent Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "On evasion behaviour in public transport: Dissatisfaction or contagion?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 626-651.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:102:y:2024:i:c:s0160289623000855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.