IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v77y2019ics0160289619301783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Even a single trivial binding of information is critical for fluid intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Chuderski, Adam

Abstract

General fluid intelligence—the individual ability for abstract reasoning that predicts many professional and daily-life outcomes—has been linked to the efficacy of processing relations. However, how simple relations still require fluid intelligence remains elusive. Across six studies (N = 1040) using the transitive reasoning task, the amount of information to be bound together to select the correct option was consecutively simplified, from binding four symbols into a monotonic order, to trivial finding of the exact copy of a symbol triplet that relayed no meaningful relationship. Even the simplest variants correlated with fluid intelligence almost as strongly (rs around 0.50) as the regular intelligence tests (rs around 0.60). Only when symbols were chunked into one representation was fluid intelligence no longer relevant. These results suggest that even a single trivial binding of simple information is critical to fluid intelligence.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuderski, Adam, 2019. "Even a single trivial binding of information is critical for fluid intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:77:y:2019:i:c:s0160289619301783
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2019.101396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289619301783
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jastrzębski, Jan & Ociepka, Michał & Chuderski, Adam, 2020. "Fluid reasoning is equivalent to relation processing," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Wilhelm, Oliver & Kyllonen, Patrick, 2021. "To predict the future, consider the past: Revisiting Carroll (1993) as a guide to the future of intelligence research," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Schubert, Anna-Lena & Löffler, Christoph & Wiebel, Clara & Kaulhausen, Florian & Baudson, Tanja Gabriele, 2024. "Don't waste your time measuring intelligence: Further evidence for the validity of a three-minute speeded reasoning test," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Protzko, John & Colom, Roberto, 2021. "A new beginning of intelligence research. Designing the playground," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:77:y:2019:i:c:s0160289619301783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.