IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v89y2019icp92-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric inference for distortion risk measures on tail regions

Author

Listed:
  • Hou, Yanxi
  • Wang, Xing

Abstract

Suppose X is some interesting loss and Y is a benchmark variable. Given some extreme scenarios of Y, it is indispensable to measure the tail risk of X by applying a class of univariate risk measures to study the co-movement of the two variables. In this paper, we consider the extreme and nonparametric inference for the distortion risk measures on the tail regions when the extreme scenarios of some benchmark variable are considered. We derive the limit of the proposed risk measures based on Extreme Value Theory. The asymptotics of the risk measures shows the decomposition of the marginal extreme value index and the extreme dependence structure which implies how these two pieces of information have influences on the limit of the risk measures. Finally, for practical purpose, we develop a nonparametric estimation method for the distortion risk measures on tail regions and its asymptotic normality is derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Hou, Yanxi & Wang, Xing, 2019. "Nonparametric inference for distortion risk measures on tail regions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 92-110.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:89:y:2019:i:c:p:92-110
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.09.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668719303919
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.09.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn W. Harrison & J. Todd Swarthout, 2016. "Cumulative Prospect Theory in the Laboratory: A Reconsideration," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2016-04, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    2. Viral V. Acharya & Lasse H. Pedersen & Thomas Philippon & Matthew Richardson, 2017. "Measuring Systemic Risk," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(1), pages 2-47.
    3. Cai, J. & Einmahl, J.H.J. & de Haan, L.F.M. & Zhou, C., 2012. "Estimation of the Marginal Expected Shortfall : The Mean when a Related Variable is Extreme," Other publications TiSEM e96e039f-cb6b-4cd5-805b-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Arjan B. Berkelaar & Roy Kouwenberg & Thierry Post, 2004. "Optimal Portfolio Choice under Loss Aversion," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(4), pages 973-987, November.
    5. Yaari, Menahem E, 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 95-115, January.
    6. Juan-Juan Cai & John H. J. Einmahl & Laurens Haan & Chen Zhou, 2015. "Estimation of the marginal expected shortfall: the mean when a related variable is extreme," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 77(2), pages 417-442, March.
    7. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Gerrard, Russell & Hou, Yanxi & Peng, Liang, 2016. "Tail dependence measure for examining financial extreme co-movements," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 330-348.
    8. Belles-Sampera, Jaume & Guillen, Montserrat & Santolino, Miguel, 2016. "What attitudes to risk underlie distortion risk measure choices?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 101-109.
    9. Laurence Carassus & Miklós Rásonyi, 2015. "On Optimal Investment For A Behavioral Investor In Multiperiod Incomplete Market Models," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 115-153, January.
    10. Furman, Edward & Wang, Ruodu & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2017. "Gini-type measures of risk and variability: Gini shortfall, capital allocations, and heavy-tailed risks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 70-84.
    11. Bernard, Carole & Ghossoub, Mario, 2009. "Static Portfolio Choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory," MPRA Paper 15446, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Billio, Monica & Getmansky, Mila & Lo, Andrew W. & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2012. "Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 535-559.
    13. Adam, Alexandre & Houkari, Mohamed & Laurent, Jean-Paul, 2008. "Spectral risk measures and portfolio selection," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1870-1882, September.
    14. Wang, Shaun, 1996. "Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 71-92, May.
    15. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Li, Jinzhu, 2016. "Extremes for coherent risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 332-341.
    16. Zhu, Li & Li, Haijun, 2012. "Tail distortion risk and its asymptotic analysis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 115-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yu & Gao, Yu & Shu, Lei & Zhu, Xiaonan, 2023. "Network effects on risk co-movements: A network quantile autoregression-based analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    2. Sun, Hongfang & Chen, Yu & Hu, Taizhong, 2022. "Statistical inference for tail-based cumulative residual entropy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 66-95.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Xiao & Zhou, Chen, 2021. "Systemic risk allocation using the asymptotic marginal expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Sun, Hongfang & Chen, Yu & Hu, Taizhong, 2022. "Statistical inference for tail-based cumulative residual entropy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 66-95.
    3. Lin, Feng & Peng, Liang & Xie, Jiehua & Yang, Jingping, 2018. "Stochastic distortion and its transformed copula," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 148-166.
    4. Ruodu Wang & Ričardas Zitikis, 2021. "An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1413-1429, March.
    5. Yannick Hoga, 2023. "The Estimation Risk in Extreme Systemic Risk Forecasts," Papers 2304.10349, arXiv.org.
    6. Xiao Qin & Chen Zhou, 2013. "Systemic Risk Allocation for Systems with A Small Number of Banks," DNB Working Papers 378, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    7. Wei Wang & Huifu Xu, 2023. "Preference robust state-dependent distortion risk measure on act space and its application in optimal decision making," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-51, December.
    8. Liu, Ruicheng & Pun, Chi Seng, 2022. "Machine-Learning-enhanced systemic risk measure: A Two-Step supervised learning approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Bin Zou, 2017. "Optimal Investment In Hedge Funds Under Loss Aversion," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-32, May.
    10. Chuancun Yin & Dan Zhu, 2015. "New class of distortion risk measures and their tail asymptotics with emphasis on VaR," Papers 1503.08586, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    11. Daouia, Abdelaati & Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles, 2018. "Tail expectile process and risk assessment," TSE Working Papers 18-944, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    12. Wächter, Hans Peter & Mazzoni, Thomas, 2013. "Consistent modeling of risk averse behavior with spectral risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 487-495.
    13. Debora Daniela Escobar & Georg Ch. Pflug, 2020. "The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 771-794, September.
    14. Fuchs Sebastian & Trutschnig Wolfgang, 2020. "On quantile based co-risk measures and their estimation," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 396-416, January.
    15. Daouia, Abdelaati & Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles, 2017. "Extreme M-quantiles as risk measures: From L1 to Lp optimization," TSE Working Papers 17-841, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    16. Das Bikramjit & Fasen-Hartmann Vicky, 2019. "Conditional excess risk measures and multivariate regular variation," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 36(1-4), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Ji, Liuyan & Tan, Ken Seng & Yang, Fan, 2021. "Tail dependence and heavy tailedness in extreme risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 282-293.
    18. De Giorgi, Enrico G. & Legg, Shane, 2012. "Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with narrow framing and probability weighting," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 951-972.
    19. Fuchs Sebastian & Trutschnig Wolfgang, 2020. "On quantile based co-risk measures and their estimation," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 396-416, January.
    20. Huy N. Chau & Mikl'os R'asonyi, 2016. "Skorohod's representation theorem and optimal strategies for markets with frictions," Papers 1606.07311, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2017.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:89:y:2019:i:c:p:92-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.