IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v292y2020i2d10.1007_s10479-018-3119-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness

Author

Listed:
  • Debora Daniela Escobar

    (University of Vienna)

  • Georg Ch. Pflug

    (ISOR and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA))

Abstract

Distortion (Denneberg in ASTIN Bull 20(2):181–190, 1990) is a well known premium calculation principle for insurance contracts. In this paper, we study sensitivity properties of distortion functionals w.r.t. the assumptions for risk aversion as well as robustness w.r.t. ambiguity of the loss distribution. Ambiguity is measured by the Wasserstein distance. We study variances of distances for probability models and identify some worst case distributions. In addition to the direct problem we also investigate the inverse problem, that is how to identify the distortion density on the basis of observations of insurance premia.

Suggested Citation

  • Debora Daniela Escobar & Georg Ch. Pflug, 2020. "The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 771-794, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:292:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-018-3119-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-3119-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-3119-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-018-3119-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Furman, Edward & Wang, Ruodu & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2017. "Gini-type measures of risk and variability: Gini shortfall, capital allocations, and heavy-tailed risks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 70-84.
    2. David Wozabal, 2014. "Robustifying Convex Risk Measures for Linear Portfolios: A Nonparametric Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1302-1315, December.
    3. Christian Gourieroux & Wei Liu, 2006. "Sensitivity Analysis of Distortion Risk Measures," Working Papers 2006-33, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    4. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    5. Luan, Cuncun, 2001. "Insurance Premium Calculations with Anticipated Utility Theory," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 23-35, May.
    6. Francesca Greselin & Ričardas Zitikis, 2018. "From the Classical Gini Index of Income Inequality to a New Zenga-Type Relative Measure of Risk: A Modeller’s Perspective," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Yaari, Menahem E, 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 95-115, January.
    8. Goovaerts, Marc J. & Kaas, Rob & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Tang, Qihe, 2004. "A comonotonic image of independence for additive risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 581-594, December.
    9. Denneberg, Dieter, 1990. "Premium Calculation: Why Standard Deviation Should be Replaced by Absolute Deviation1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 181-190, November.
    10. Furman, Edward & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2008. "Weighted premium calculation principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 459-465, February.
    11. Wang, Shaun, 1996. "Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 71-92, May.
    12. Georg Ch Pflug & Werner Römisch, 2007. "Modeling, Measuring and Managing Risk," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6478, December.
    13. Borch, Karl, 1961. "The Utility Concept Applied to the Theory of Insurance," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(5), pages 245-255, July.
    14. Alexander Vinel & Pavlo A. Krokhmal, 2017. "Certainty equivalent measures of risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 75-95, February.
    15. Elyès Jouini & Walter Schachermayer & Nizar Touzi, 2006. "Law Invariant Risk Measures Have the Fatou Property," Post-Print halshs-00176522, HAL.
    16. David Wozabal, 2012. "A framework for optimization under ambiguity," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 21-47, March.
    17. Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1989. "Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-153, April.
    18. Pichler, Alois, 2013. "The natural Banach space for version independent risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 405-415.
    19. Hideatsu Tsukahara, 2013. "Estimation of Distortion Risk Measures," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 213-235, December.
    20. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R. & Panjer, Harry H., 1997. "Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 173-183, November.
    21. Hung Nguyen & Uyen Pham & Hien Tran, 2012. "On some claims related to Choquet integral risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 5-31, May.
    22. Rüdiger Kiesel & Robin Rühlicke & Gerhard Stahl & Jinsong Zheng, 2016. "The Wasserstein Metric and Robustness in Risk Management," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-14, August.
    23. repec:dau:papers:123456789/342 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Escobar & Georg Pflug, 2018. "The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness," Papers 1809.06592, arXiv.org.
    2. Francesca Greselin & Ričardas Zitikis, 2018. "From the Classical Gini Index of Income Inequality to a New Zenga-Type Relative Measure of Risk: A Modeller’s Perspective," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Ruodu Wang & Yunran Wei & Gordon E. Willmot, 2020. "Characterization, Robustness, and Aggregation of Signed Choquet Integrals," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 993-1015, August.
    4. Greselin, Francesca & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2015. "Measuring economic inequality and risk: a unifying approach based on personal gambles, societal preferences and references," MPRA Paper 65892, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Wei Wang & Huifu Xu, 2023. "Preference robust state-dependent distortion risk measure on act space and its application in optimal decision making," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-51, December.
    6. Denuit Michel & Dhaene Jan & Goovaerts Marc & Kaas Rob & Laeven Roger, 2006. "Risk measurement with equivalent utility principles," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Corina Birghila & Tim J. Boonen & Mario Ghossoub, 2023. "Optimal insurance under maxmin expected utility," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 467-501, April.
    8. Xia Han & Ruodu Wang & Xun Yu Zhou, 2022. "Choquet regularization for reinforcement learning," Papers 2208.08497, arXiv.org.
    9. Andreas H Hamel, 2018. "Monetary Measures of Risk," Papers 1812.04354, arXiv.org.
    10. Holly Brannelly & Andrea Macrina & Gareth W. Peters, 2021. "Stochastic measure distortions induced by quantile processes for risk quantification and valuation," Papers 2201.02045, arXiv.org.
    11. Gzyl, Henryk & Mayoral, Silvia, 2008. "Determination of risk pricing measures from market prices of risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 437-443, December.
    12. Samuel Solgon Santos & Marlon Ruoso Moresco & Marcelo Brutti Righi & Eduardo de Oliveira Horta, 2023. "A note on the induction of comonotonic additive risk measures from acceptance sets," Papers 2307.04647, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    13. Santos, Samuel S. & Moresco, Marlon R. & Righi, Marcelo B. & Horta, Eduardo, 2024. "A note on the induction of comonotonic additive risk measures from acceptance sets," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    14. Dilip B. Madan, 2016. "Conic Portfolio Theory," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-42, May.
    15. Adam, Alexandre & Houkari, Mohamed & Laurent, Jean-Paul, 2008. "Spectral risk measures and portfolio selection," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1870-1882, September.
    16. Psarrakos, Georgios & Toomaj, Abdolsaeed & Vliora, Polyxeni, 2024. "A family of variability measures based on the cumulative residual entropy and distortion functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 212-222.
    17. Song, Yongsheng & Yan, Jia-An, 2009. "Risk measures with comonotonic subadditivity or convexity and respecting stochastic orders," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 459-465, December.
    18. Furman, Edward & Landsman, Zinoviy, 2010. "Multivariate Tweedie distributions and some related capital-at-risk analyses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 351-361, April.
    19. Schumacher Johannes M., 2018. "Distortion risk measures, ROC curves, and distortion divergence," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 35(1-2), pages 35-50, January.
    20. Leitner, Johannes, 2005. "Dilatation monotonous Choquet integrals," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 994-1006, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:292:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-018-3119-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.