IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/injoed/v71y2019ics0738059319305474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges facing international faculty at Japanese universities: Main findings from the 2017 national survey

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Futao
  • Daizen, Tsukasa
  • Kim, Yangson

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the main challenges facing full-time international faculty at Japanese universities based on relevant findings from a national survey of them which was carried out from June to August 2017. The study suggests that despite differences in degree, international faculty believed that they experienced many challenges at national, institutional and personal levels. This is especially true in the cases of their responses to the survey questions about the closed nature of Japanese academic market to international faculty and institutional atmosphere. Further, differences in their attitudes toward large numbers of survey questions by academic rank, discipline and nationality are noteworthy and extremely relevant as well. Finally, the American and British junior faculty from the Humanities seem to encounter more difficulties such as unstable employment, uncertain career prospects and serious competitive survival situation than any other categories of international faculty.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Futao & Daizen, Tsukasa & Kim, Yangson, 2019. "Challenges facing international faculty at Japanese universities: Main findings from the 2017 national survey," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:71:y:2019:i:c:s0738059319305474
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059319305474
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Green & Yoshihiko Kadoya, 2013. "English as a Gateway? Immigration and Public Opinion in Japan," ISER Discussion Paper 0883, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Ellen Hazelkorn, 2007. "The Impact of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision Making," Higher Education Management and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 19(2), pages 1-24.
    3. Akbar Marvasti, 2005. "U.S. Academic Institutions and Perceived Effectiveness of Foreign-Born Faculty," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 151-176, March.
    4. Paula Stephan & Chiara Franzoni & Giuseppe Scellato, 2016. "Global competition for scientific talent: evidence from location decisions of PhDs and postdocs in 16 countries," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(3), pages 457-485.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Chi Chen & Dian-Fu Chang, 2022. "Exploring International Faculty’s Perspectives on Their Campus Life by PLS-SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Jung Cheol Shin & Soo Jeung Lee, 2022. "Different measures of international faculty and their impacts on global rankings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6125-6145, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bjørn Stensaker, 2018. "University Alliances: Enhancing Control, Capacity, and Creativity in Dynamic Environments," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 132-153.
    2. Joost Kosten, 2016. "A classification of the use of research indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 457-464, July.
    3. Daraio, Cinzia & Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Simar, Léopold, 2015. "Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 918-930.
    4. Johannes Sorz & Wolfgang Glänzel & Ursula Ulrych & Christian Gumpenberger & Juan Gorraiz, 2020. "Research strengths identified by esteem and bibliometric indicators: a case study at the University of Vienna," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1095-1116, November.
    5. Csató, László & Tóth, Csaba, 2020. "University rankings from the revealed preferences of the applicants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 309-320.
    6. Harjit Sekhon & Andrews Agya Yalley & Sanjit Kumar Roy & Gurvinder Singh Shergill, 2016. "A cross-country study of service productivity," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5-6), pages 223-238, April.
    7. Haneul Choi & Donald S. Siegel & David A. Waldman & Ashlee Frandell & Joohyung Kim, 2024. "Role conflict, entrepreneurial identity, and academic entrepreneurship: the effects of immigration status," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 611-626, August.
    8. Saisana, Michaela & d'Hombres, Béatrice & Saltelli, Andrea, 2011. "Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 165-177, February.
    9. Csóka, Imola & Sebestyén, Géza & Neszveda, Gábor, 2019. "Tudományos teljesítmény mérése a magyar felsőoktatás gazdasági képzéseiben [Measuring scientific performance of business and economics faculties in Hungarian higher education]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 751-770.
    10. Jeongeun Kim, 2018. "The Functions and Dysfunctions of College Rankings: An Analysis of Institutional Expenditure," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(1), pages 54-87, February.
    11. Izzat Alsmadi & Z. W. Taylor & Joshua Childs, 2020. "U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges rankings: Which institutional metrics contribute to sustained stratification?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 1851-1869, September.
    12. Стенсакер Б., 2018. "Ассоциации Университетов: Усиление Контроля, Увеличение Потенциала, Развитие Креативности В Динамично Меняющейся Среде(Пер. С Англ. Л. Трониной)," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 132-153.
    13. Shiri M. Breznitz & Qiantao Zhang, 0. "Determinants of graduates’ entrepreneurial activity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    14. Ming Yuan Hsieh, 2020. "The Most Sustainable Niche Principles of Social Media Education in A Higher Education Contracting Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Eric Joseph van Holm & Heyjie Jung & Eric W. Welch, 2021. "The impacts of foreignness and cultural distance on commercialization of patents," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 29-61, February.
    16. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Cinzia Daraio, 2014. "Beyond university rankings ? Generating new indicators on European universities by linking data in open platforms," DIAG Technical Reports 2014-12, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    17. Yang Zhang & Yu Xiao & Jun Wu & Xin Lu, 2021. "Comprehensive world university ranking based on ranking aggregation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1139-1152, June.
    18. Barra, Cristian & Lagravinese, Raffaele & Zotti, Roberto, 2018. "Does econometric methodology matter to rank universities? An analysis of Italian higher education system," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 104-120.
    19. Ludo Waltman & Clara Calero-Medina & Joost Kosten & Ed C.M. Noyons & Robert J.W. Tijssen & Nees Jan Eck & Thed N. Leeuwen & Anthony F.J. Raan & Martijn S. Visser & Paul Wouters, 2012. "The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(12), pages 2419-2432, December.
    20. Guerrero, Maribel & Cunningham, James A. & Urbano, David, 2015. "Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 748-764.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:71:y:2019:i:c:s0738059319305474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-educational-development .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.