IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v36y2016i1p126-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of workflow management systems: A longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Reijers, H.A.
  • Vanderfeesten, I.
  • van der Aalst, W.M.P.

Abstract

Workflow management systems coordinate and allocate work through the various stages of executing business processes. The benefits of such systems appear pervasive, but no hard data is available that confirms that their implementation improves organizational performance. In part, this is due to the difficulty of measuring the effects of enterprise-wide initiatives in general. In this paper, the results are presented of a longitudinal, multi-case study into the effectiveness of workflow management technology. The study builds on a novel methodology that combines field work and computer simulations. Through its application, the contribution of this technology to conduct business processes faster and with less effort could be quantitatively assessed. Surprisingly, only a fraction of the projects that were followed in this longitudinal study led to a fully operational implementation of a workflow management system at all. Even so, in most of the projects where such a system was introduced this resulted in substantial improvements. We present success and fail factors for the implementation of this technology within organizations, which we inferred from a follow-up analysis. The novel methodology presented in this paper is thought to be of value to track the performance effects of introducing other technologies or organization concepts as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Reijers, H.A. & Vanderfeesten, I. & van der Aalst, W.M.P., 2016. "The effectiveness of workflow management systems: A longitudinal study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 126-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:36:y:2016:i:1:p:126-141
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401215000808
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wil van der Aalst & Kees van Hee, 2004. "Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262720469, April.
    2. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    3. Reijers, Hajo A. & van der Aalst, Wil M.P., 2005. "The effectiveness of workflow management systems: Predictions and lessons learned," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 458-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alicia Martin-Navarro & Maria Paula Lechuga Sancho & Jose Aurelio Medina-Garrido, 2023. "Business process management systems in port processes: a systematic literature review," Papers 2312.00443, arXiv.org.
    2. Sudhanshu Singh & Rakesh Verma & Saroj Koul, 2022. "A data-driven approach to shared decision-making in a healthcare environment," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(2), pages 732-746, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jurczuk Arkadiusz, 2021. "Barriers to implementation of business process governance mechanisms," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 22-38, December.
    2. Simon Gorecki & Jalal Possik & Gregory Zacharewicz & Yves Ducq & Nicolas Perry, 2020. "A Multicomponent Distributed Framework for Smart Production System Modeling and Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    4. Sagnika Sen & T. S. Raghu, 2013. "Interdependencies in IT Infrastructure Services: Analyzing Service Processes for Optimal Incentive Design," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 822-841, September.
    5. Brocke, Jan vom & Zelt, Sarah & Schmiedel, Theresa, 2016. "On the role of context in business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 486-495.
    6. Chang, Hsin Hsin & Wang, I. Chen, 2011. "Enterprise Information Portals in support of business process, design teams and collaborative commerce performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 171-182.
    7. Nigel Adams & Adriano Augusto & Michael Davern & Marcello La Rosa, 2023. "Five guidelines to improve context-aware process selection: an Australian banking perspective," Papers 2304.05033, arXiv.org.
    8. Guoxin Su & Li Liu, 2024. "Workflow Trace Profiling and Execution Time Analysis in Quantitative Verification," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Trkman, Marina & Trkman, Peter, 2014. "Actors’ misaligned interests to explain the low impact of an information system – A case study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 296-307.
    10. Pereira José Luís & e Sá Jorge Oliveira, 2017. "Process-Based Information Systems Development: Taking Advantage of a Component-Based Infrastructure," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 71-83, September.
    11. Tyrychtr, Jan, 2017. "Economic Value of Information Systems in Agriculture: Cohesion and Coupling of Information Elements," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(3), September.
    12. Tyson R. Browning & Ernst Fricke & Herbert Negele, 2006. "Key concepts in modeling product development processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 104-128, June.
    13. Iovanella, Antonio, 2024. "Exploiting network science in business process management: A conceptual framework," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. D. Venkatesan & S. Sridhar, 2017. "A novel programming framework for architecting next generation enterprise scale information systems," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-534, May.
    15. Lim, Chiehyeon & Kim, Ki-Hun & Kim, Min-Jun & Heo, Jun-Yeon & Kim, Kwang-Jae & Maglio, Paul P., 2018. "From data to value: A nine-factor framework for data-based value creation in information-intensive services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 121-135.
    16. Daehyoun Choi & Hind R’bigui & Chiwoon Cho, 2021. "Candidate Digital Tasks Selection Methodology for Automation with Robotic Process Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    17. D. Venkatesan & S. Sridhar, 0. "A novel programming framework for architecting next generation enterprise scale information systems," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-46.
    18. Leander Luiz Klein & Kelmara Mendes Vieira & Thiago Schirmer Feltrin & Matheus Pissutti & Luciano Dibi Ercolani, 2022. "The Influence of Lean Management Practices on Process Effectiveness: A Quantitative Study in a Public Institution," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    19. Škrinjar, Rok & Trkman, Peter, 2013. "Increasing process orientation with business process management: Critical practices’," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 48-60.
    20. Borman, Mark & Janssen, Marijn, 2013. "Reconciling two approaches to critical success factors: The case of shared services in the public sector," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 390-400.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:36:y:2016:i:1:p:126-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.