IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v178y2024ics0960077923012468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploiting network science in business process management: A conceptual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Iovanella, Antonio

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the introduction of network science tools in Business Process Management (BPM) leads to better identification of the entities themselves and to the structure of their interactions within an organization. The objective is to provide more formal measures and metrics to be considered as a support for suitable decisions during the re-engineering phases. A novel conceptual framework is presented for organizational decision making; one that is able to synthesize the relationships established in the network and provide an overview of the characteristics of the entities. Decision makers can improve the knowledge of the current organizational policies and procedures to be used in process re-engineering. The framework is an innovative initiative of integration of classic BPM and network science methodologies. It allows a systematic assessment of the interplay between the different organizational units and the indirect effects on the performance and it can be used in any kind of organization that implements a Business Process Management System.

Suggested Citation

  • Iovanella, Antonio, 2024. "Exploiting network science in business process management: A conceptual framework," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:178:y:2024:i:c:s0960077923012468
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923012468
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barabási, Albert-László & Albert, Réka & Jeong, Hawoong, 2000. "Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 281(1), pages 69-77.
    2. Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Wang, Peng & Ma, Jun-Chao & Zhu, Peican & Han, Zhen & Podobnik, Boris & Stanley, H. Eugene & Zhou, Wei-Xing & Alfaro-Bittner, Karin & Boccaletti, Stefano, 2023. "Unraveling the effects of network, direct and indirect reciprocity in online societies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Brina Buh & Andrej Kovačič & Mojca Indihar Štemberger, 2015. "Critical success factors for different stages of business process management adoption – a case study," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 243-258, January.
    4. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo & Rapisarda, Andrea, 2004. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 340(1), pages 388-394.
    5. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    6. Leon, Ramona – Diana & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Raúl & Gómez-Gasquet, Pedro & Mula, Josefa, 2017. "Social network analysis: A tool for evaluating and predicting future knowledge flows from an insurance organization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 103-118.
    7. Reijers, H. A. & Liman Mansar, S., 2005. "Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 283-306, August.
    8. Freeman, C., 1991. "Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 499-514, October.
    9. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    10. Li, Jiaqi & Zhang, Chunyan & Sun, Qinglin & Chen, Zengqiang, 2015. "Coevolution between strategy and social networks structure promotes cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 253-263.
    11. Eppinger, Steven D. & Browning, Tyson R., 2012. "Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262017520, December.
    12. Carbone, Anna & Jensen, Meiko & Sato, Aki-Hiro, 2016. "Challenges in data science: a complex systems perspective," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-7.
    13. Aloini, Davide & Benevento, Elisabetta & Stefanini, Alessandro & Zerbino, Pierluigi, 2020. "Process fragmentation and port performance: Merging SNA and text mining," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    14. Giovanna Ferraro & Antonio Iovanella, 2018. "Clairvoyant targeted attack on complex networks," International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 41-62.
    15. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo & Rapisarda, Andrea, 2003. "Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 622-642.
    16. Ritter, Thomas & Gemunden, Hans Georg, 2003. "Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 745-755, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morehead, Raymond & Noore, Afzel, 2007. "Novel hybrid mitigation strategy for improving the resiliency of hierarchical networks subjected to attacks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 378(2), pages 603-612.
    2. Kashyap, G. & Ambika, G., 2019. "Link deletion in directed complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 631-643.
    3. Cerqueti, Roy & Ferraro, Giovanna & Iovanella, Antonio, 2019. "Measuring network resilience through connection patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 320-329.
    4. Sohn, Insoo, 2019. "A robust complex network generation method based on neural networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 593-601.
    5. Zhao, Jianyu & Wei, Jiang & Yu, Lean & Xi, Xi, 2022. "Robustness of knowledge networks under targeted attacks: Electric vehicle field of China evidence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 367-382.
    6. Lv, Changchun & Yuan, Ziwei & Si, Shubin & Duan, Dongli, 2021. "Robustness of scale-free networks with dynamical behavior against multi-node perturbation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Liu, Qing & Yang, Yang & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Jiang, Changmin, 2023. "An analysis on the resilience of the European port network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Gao, Yan-Li & Chen, Shi-Ming & Nie, Sen & Ma, Fei & Guan, Jun-Jie, 2018. "Robustness analysis of interdependent networks under multiple-attacking strategies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 495-504.
    9. Matteo Cinelli & Giovanna Ferraro & Antonio Iovanella, 2017. "Resilience of Core-Periphery Networks in the Case of Rich-Club," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, December.
    10. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Wang, Yanhui, 2020. "Edge attack strategies in interdependent scale-free networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    11. Saniee Monfared, Momhammad Ali & Jalili, Mahdi & Alipour, Zohreh, 2014. "Topology and vulnerability of the Iranian power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 24-33.
    12. Lv, Changchun & Yuan, Ziwei & Si, Shubin & Duan, Dongli & Yao, Shirui, 2022. "Cascading failure in networks with dynamical behavior against multi-node removal," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Ghedini, Cinara G. & Ribeiro, Carlos H.C., 2011. "Rethinking failure and attack tolerance assessment in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4684-4691.
    14. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    15. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei, 2018. "Efficiency of complex networks under failures and attacks: A percolation approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 658-664.
    16. Viljoen, Nadia M. & Joubert, Johan W., 2016. "The vulnerability of the global container shipping network to targeted link disruption," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 396-409.
    17. Wang, Lei & Wang, Yu & Zhao, Yulong, 2014. "Mechanism of asymmetric software structures: A complex network perspective from behaviors of new nodes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 413(C), pages 162-172.
    18. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    19. Sodam Baek & Kibae Kim & Jorn Altmann, 2014. "Role of Platform Providers in Service Networks: The Case of Salesforce.com AppExchange," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2014112, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised May 2014.
    20. Nina Liu & Jiwu Wang & Yan Song, 2019. "Organization Mechanisms and Spatial Characteristics of Urban Collaborative Innovation Networks: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:178:y:2024:i:c:s0960077923012468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.