IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v34y2014i6p770-779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge sharing in project-based organizations: Overcoming the informational limbo

Author

Listed:
  • Almeida, Maria Vaz
  • Soares, António Lucas

Abstract

Project-based organizations (PBO) are nowadays widespread in almost all the activity sectors. This type of organizations poses complex problems for information and knowledge management due to the fragmentation and lack of uniformity of organizational structures, processes, practices, and technologies. The ineffectiveness of knowledge sharing over time, between project teams, is perhaps the most prominent issue that PBO must deal with. This strongly affects organizational learning, which seems to under-deliver value to PBO. Therefore, relevant knowledge is trapped in an “informational limbo” out of reach, not being capitalized for the organization. This is particularly true in research and development (R&D) institutions, where knowledge sharing can be hindered by conceptual misunderstandings resulting from different disciplines, cultures and ways of working of project participants. This paper addresses such issues by analyzing, in a comprehensive way, how information and knowledge management can better suit project team's needs and at the same time improve organizational learning. An ethnographic study, based on immersed participant observation, is performed at a Portuguese R&D Institute, in order to understand the link between the way information is managed in a project and how people interact and learn by sharing knowledge between projects. Results provide a set of enterprise information management (EIM) recommendations. Findings also suggest that a PBO-wide EIM strategy, balancing knowledge codification and personalization mechanisms, is a feasible solution to overcome the problems of knowledge sharing in PBO.

Suggested Citation

  • Almeida, Maria Vaz & Soares, António Lucas, 2014. "Knowledge sharing in project-based organizations: Overcoming the informational limbo," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 770-779.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:6:p:770-779
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.07.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401214000711
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.07.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prencipe, Andrea & Tell, Fredrik, 2001. "Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1373-1394, December.
    2. Johannessen, Jon-Arild & Olsen, Bjørn, 2011. "Projects as communicating systems: Creating a culture of innovation and performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 30-37.
    3. Jang-Hwan Lee & Young-Gul Kim & Min-Yong Kim, 2006. "Effects of Managerial Drivers and Climate Maturity on Knowledge-Management Performance: Empirical Validation," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 19(3), pages 48-60, July.
    4. Chala O. V., 2010. "Information space of the enterprise as object of management," Вісник економіки транспорту і промисловості, CyberLeninka;Украинская государственная академия железнодорожного транспорта, issue 32, pages 249-251.
    5. Coakes, E.W. & Coakes, J.M. & Rosenberg, D., 2008. "Co-operative work practices and knowledge sharing issues: A comparison of viewpoints," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 12-25.
    6. (Neels) Kruger, C.J. & Johnson, Roy D., 2010. "Information management as an enabler of knowledge management maturity: A South African perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 57-67.
    7. Linda Argote & Bill McEvily & Ray Reagans, 2003. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Managing Knowledge in Organizations: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 1-1, April.
    8. Karim, Nor Shahriza Abdul & Hussein, Ramlah, 2008. "Managers’ perception of information management and the role of information and knowledge managers: The Malaysian perspectives," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 114-127.
    9. Detlor, Brian, 2010. "Information management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 103-108.
    10. Howell, Kerry E. & Annansingh, Fenio, 2013. "Knowledge generation and sharing in UK universities: A tale of two cultures?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 32-39.
    11. Blindenbach-Driessen, Floortje & van den Ende, Jan, 2006. "Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 545-561, May.
    12. Yang, Chen-Wei & Fang, Shih-Chieh & Lin, Julia L., 2010. "Organisational knowledge creation strategies: A conceptual framework," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 231-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Yu-Qian, 2016. "Solving knowledge sharing disparity: The role of team identification, organizational identification, and in-group bias," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1174-1183.
    2. Julien de Benedittis, 2019. "Transition between temporary organizations: Dimensions enabling economies of recombination," Post-Print emse-02267574, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Toni, Alberto F. & Pessot, Elena, 2021. "Investigating organisational learning to master project complexity: An embedded case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 541-554.
    2. Anjar Priyono, 2016. "The use of ICT platforms to promote knowledge exchange in project-based organisations," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 4(2), pages 5-21, December.
    3. Saparova, Dinara & Kibaru, Francis & Bašić, Josipa, 2013. "Use of widgets as information management tools in online shared spaces," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 401-407.
    4. Zamfir Francisca-Elena, 2020. "The impact of knowledge transfer on the Organizational performance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 577-588, July.
    5. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    6. Beerepoot, Milou & Beerepoot, Niels, 2007. "Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4812-4825, October.
    7. Emilio Bellini & Giuseppe Piroli & Luca Pennacchio, 2019. "Collaborative know-how and trust in university–industry collaborations: empirical evidence from ICT firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1939-1963, December.
    8. Parker, Owen N. & Mui, Rachel & Bhawe, Nachiket & Semadeni, Matthew, 2022. "Insight or ignorance: How collaborative history in a workgroup fits with project type to shape performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 154-167.
    9. Vatafu Eliza Ramona, 2010. "Knowledge Management - The Key Resource For Become Competitive," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, December.
    10. Razmdoost, Kamran & Alinaghian, Leila & Smyth, Hedley J., 2019. "Multiplex value cocreation in unique service exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 277-286.
    11. Gyewan Moon & Suk Bong Choi & Shaikh Javed Fardin, 2016. "Organisational factors for effective knowledge sharing: an empirical study of Korean learning teams," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 102-120.
    12. Paul Chan & Rachel Cooper & Patricia Tzortzopoulos, 2005. "Organizational learning: conceptual challenges from a project perspective," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7), pages 747-756.
    13. Lobo, Sunila & Whyte, Jennifer, 2017. "Aligning and Reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 93-107.
    14. Hani M. Gharaibeh, 2016. "Project team learning in mega projects: are we truly learning the lessons?," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 87-102.
    15. Nisar Ahmad & Muhammad Saeed Lodhi & Khalid Zaman & Imran Naseem, 2017. "Knowledge Management: a Gateway for Organizational Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 859-876, September.
    16. Rob Kim Marjerison & Matthew Andrews & George Kuan, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Organizations through Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Carolyn D. Egelman & Dennis Epple & Linda Argote & Erica R.H. Fuchs, 2013. "Learning by Doing in a Multi-Product Manufacturing Environment: Product Variety, Customizations, and Overlapping Product Generations," NBER Working Papers 19674, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Ozer, Muammer, 2007. "Reducing the demand uncertainties at the fuzzy-front-end of developing new online services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 1372-1387, November.
    19. Alami Mohamed, 2023. "The relationship between perception of IT and performance management in Moroccan companies: a qualitative study [La relation entre la perception des technologies d'information et le pilotage de la ," Post-Print hal-04224226, HAL.
    20. Benjamin Matthies, 2017. "A Text Mining Approach for Extracting Lessons Learned from Project Documentation: An Illustrative Case Study," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 6(2), pages 153-174.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:6:p:770-779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.