IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v34y2014i4p437-445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the technology acceptance model to a Spanish City Hall

Author

Listed:
  • Moreno Cegarra, José Luis
  • Cegarra Navarro, Juan Gabriel
  • Córdoba Pachón, José Rodrigo

Abstract

This paper examines the relative importance and significance of the four technology enablers introduced by Davis (1989) in the technology acceptance model (TAM) (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude towards using and behavioural intention) for use on four different levels of citizen engagement in e-government (null, publish, interact and transact). An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) is developed to test citizen engagement towards online e-government services from a sample of 307 citizens who used the benefits advisor tool within a Spanish City Hall. Although the proposed model follows TAM and explains the intention towards the actual use of e-government by postulating four direct determinants, “A, PU, PEOU and BI” have been considered as parallel processes, meaning that each can have separate influence in different levels of citizen engagement. To achieve this goal, a multinomial logistic regression is developed and tested to confirm the explanatory power of the four technology enablers on the four different levels of e-government. Our findings further suggest that in order to implement e-government, some of the enablers matter more than others to move from one level of citizen engagement to another. The main contribution of the paper is to question the use of existing models which seek to represent the relationship between technology enablers and the adoption of e-government services without considering their impacts on citizens’ engagement. The implications of the findings are discussed and useful insights are provided in relation to policy recommendations geared to create appropriate conditions to build citizens’ engagement intent of use of e-government services.

Suggested Citation

  • Moreno Cegarra, José Luis & Cegarra Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Córdoba Pachón, José Rodrigo, 2014. "Applying the technology acceptance model to a Spanish City Hall," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 437-445.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:4:p:437-445
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.02.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401214000176
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.02.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon Hartwick & Henri Barki, 1994. "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 440-465, April.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Cohen , Galit & Nijkamp, Peter, 2004. "City, ICT and Policy," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 4, pages 29-51.
    4. Lean, Ooh Kim & Zailani, Suhaiza & Ramayah, T. & Fernando, Yudi, 2009. "Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 458-475.
    5. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Badri, Masood Abdulla & Alshare, Khaled, 2008. "A path analytic model and measurement of the business value of e-government: An international perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 524-535.
    7. Mohd Suki, Norazah & T, Ramayah, 2011. "Modelling Customer’s Attitude Towards EGovernment Services," MPRA Paper 41601, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cho, Sanggoo & Choi, Gyunghyun, 2019. "Exploring Latent Factors Influencing the Adoption of a Processed Food Traceability System in South Korea," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(02), January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel & Pachón, José Rodrigo Córdoba & Cegarra, José Luis Moreno, 2012. "E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 469-478.
    2. Wang, Guoqiang & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Yuan, Yunpeng & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "Revisiting TAM2 in behavioral targeting advertising: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Lingling Gao & Kerem Aksel Waechter, 0. "Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    4. Kazeminia, Azadeh & Hultman, Magnus & Mostaghel, Rana, 2016. "Why pay more for sustainable services? The case of ecotourism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4992-4997.
    5. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    6. Hongping Yuan & Yu Yang & Xiaolong Xue, 2019. "Promoting Owners’ BIM Adoption Behaviors to Achieve Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Yanqing Song & Han Bao & Shan Shen, 2022. "Understanding the Influence of Initial Values of College Students in Shaping Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    10. Madeleine Feder & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2019. "Understanding the behavioral gap: Why would managers (not) engage in CSR-related activities?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 95-126, April.
    11. Czakon, Wojciech & Niemand, Thomas & Gast, Johanna & Kraus, Sascha & Frühstück, Lisa, 2020. "Designing coopetition for radical innovation: An experimental study of managers' preferences for developing self-driving electric cars," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Hossain, Akram & Quaresma, Rui & Rahman, Habibur, 2019. "Investigating factors influencing the physicians’ adoption of electronic health record (EHR) in healthcare system of Bangladesh: An empirical study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 76-87.
    13. Tendai Douglas Svotwa & Olumide Jaiyeoba & Mornay Roberts-Lombard & Charles Makanyeza, 2022. "Perceived Access to Finance, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy, Attitude Toward Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Ability, and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Botswana Youth Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    14. Sumeet Gupta & Haejung Yun & Heng Xu & Hee-Woong Kim, 2017. "An exploratory study on mobile banking adoption in Indian metropolitan and urban areas: a scenario-based experiment," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 127-152, January.
    15. Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk & Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska & Sylwia Flaszewska, 2021. "From Words to Deeds: The Impact of Pro-Environmental Self-Identity on Green Energy Purchase Intention," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Tamer Ayad & Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2022. "University Incubator Support and Entrepreneurial Intention among Tourism Graduates: Mediating Role of Personal Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Domina, Tanya & Lee, Seung-Eun & MacGillivray, Maureen, 2012. "Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 613-620.
    18. Swapan Kumar Saha & Guijun Zhuang & Sihan Li, 2020. "Will Consumers Pay More for Efficient Delivery? An Empirical Study of What Affects E-Customers’ Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay on Online Shopping in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Damianus Abun & Sylvia Lalaine Grace L. Foronda & Fredolin P. Julian & Egdona A. Quinto & Theogenia Magallanes, 2022. "Business intention of students with family business and entrepreneurial education background," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 4(2), pages 01-12, April.
    20. Shui-Lien Chen & June-Hong Chen & Yung Hsin Lee, 2018. "A Comparison of Competing Models for Understanding Industrial Organization’s Acceptance of Cloud Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:4:p:437-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.