IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v31y2011i1p21-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making functional units functional: The role of rhetorical structure in use of scholarly journal articles

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Lei
  • Kopak, Rick
  • Freund, Luanne
  • Rasmussen, Edie

Abstract

Scholars are reading more journal articles than ever, so it is important that they focus on the relevant text within the articles they read. To support this goal, this study explores enhancements to a journal reading system by applying the idea of the functional unit, the smallest information unit with a distinct function within four major components of scholarly journal articles—Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion. This study examined a set of functional units and their associations with scholarly journal article use tasks through literature analysis and validation surveys. Forty-one typical functional units were found in psychology journal articles, with varying relevance to five tasks requiring use of information in journal articles. The relationships among sets of functional units for particular tasks were also identified. A taxonomy was developed incorporating the relationships between functional units and information use tasks, which can be used to inform system design. Based on this taxonomy, a prototype journal reading environment signalling functional units was designed and implemented for testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Lei & Kopak, Rick & Freund, Luanne & Rasmussen, Edie, 2011. "Making functional units functional: The role of rhetorical structure in use of scholarly journal articles," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 21-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:21-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401210001477
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howard D. White, 2007. "Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory, Part 2: Some implications for information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(4), pages 583-605, February.
    2. Mark A. Rosso, 2008. "User‐based identification of Web genres," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(7), pages 1053-1072, May.
    3. Stephen P. Harter, 1992. "Psychological relevance and information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 43(9), pages 602-615, October.
    4. Tefko Saracevic, 2007. "Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 2126-2144, November.
    5. Robert J. Sandusky & Carol Tenopir, 2008. "Finding and using journal‐article components: Impacts of disaggregation on teaching and research practice," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 970-982, April.
    6. Andrew Dillon, 2000. "Spatial‐semantics: How users derive shape from information space," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(6), pages 521-528.
    7. Tefko Saracevic, 2007. "Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 1915-1933, November.
    8. Ann Peterson Bishop & Laura J. Neumann & Susan Leigh Star & Cecelia Merkel & Emily Ignacio & Robert J. Sandusky, 2000. "Digital libraries: Situating use in changing information infrastructure," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(4), pages 394-413.
    9. Howard D. White, 2007. "Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory, Part 1: First examples of a synthesis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(4), pages 536-559, February.
    10. Andrew Dillon & Dille Schaap, 1996. "Expertise and the perception of shape in information," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 47(10), pages 786-788, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wayne de Fremery & Michael K. Buckland, 2022. "Context, relevance, and labor," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1268-1278, September.
    2. Jensen, Scott & Liu, Xiaozhong & Yu, Yingying & Milojevic, Staša, 2016. "Generation of topic evolution trees from heterogeneous bibliographic networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 606-621.
    3. Howard D. White, 2015. "Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory: examples from the humanities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2275-2299, March.
    4. Roland Grad & Pierre Pluye & Vera Granikov & Janique Johnson‐Lafleur & Michael Shulha & Soumya Bindiganavile Sridhar & Jonathan L. Moscovici & Gillian Bartlett & Alain C. Vandal & Bernard Marlow & Lor, 2011. "Physicians' assessment of the value of clinical information: Operationalization of a theoretical model," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1884-1891, October.
    5. Katherine W. McCain, 2018. "Beyond Garfield’s Citation Index: an assessment of some issues in building a personal name Acknowledgments Index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 605-631, February.
    6. Julianne Sansa-Otim & Mary Nsabagwa & Andrew Mwesigwa & Becky Faith & Mojisola Owoseni & Olayinka Osuolale & Daudi Mboma & Ben Khemis & Peter Albino & Samuel Owusu Ansah & Maureen Abla Ahiataku & Vict, 2022. "An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Weather Information Dissemination among Farmers and Policy Makers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Maram Hasanain & Tamer Elsayed, 2022. "Studying effectiveness of Web search for fact checking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(5), pages 738-751, May.
    8. Gineke Wiggers & Suzan Verberne & Wouter van Loon & Gerrit‐Jan Zwenne, 2023. "Bibliometric‐enhanced legal information retrieval: Combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(8), pages 1010-1025, August.
    9. Frans van der Sluis & Egon L. van den Broek, 2023. "Feedback beyond accuracy: Using eye‐tracking to detect comprehensibility and interest during reading," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 3-16, January.
    10. Müge Akbulut & Yaşar Tonta & Howard D. White, 2020. "Related records retrieval and pennant retrieval: an exploratory case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(2), pages 957-987, February.
    11. Ian Ruthven, 2021. "Resonance and the experience of relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(5), pages 554-569, May.
    12. Antonio Maria Rinaldi & Cristiano Russo & Cristian Tommasino, 2020. "A Knowledge-Driven Multimedia Retrieval System Based on Semantics and Deep Features," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Xiaoli Huang & Dagobert Soergel, 2013. "Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 18-35, January.
    14. Howard D. White, 2010. "Some new tests of relevance theory in information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(3), pages 653-667, June.
    15. Alexander Karlsson & Björn Hammarfelt & H. Joe Steinhauer & Göran Falkman & Nasrine Olson & Gustaf Nelhans & Jan Nolin, 2015. "Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval: an information fusion approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2255-2274, March.
    16. Min Sook Park & JungHo Park & Hyejin Kim & Jin Hui Lee & Hyejin Park, 2023. "Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID‐19 vaccination intent," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(7), pages 846-865, July.
    17. Michelle Berger & Ricarda Schäfer & Marco Schmidt & Christian Regal & Henner Gimpel, 2024. "How to prevent technostress at the digital workplace: a Delphi study," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(7), pages 1051-1113, October.
    18. Marcia J. Bates, 2011. "Birger Hjørland's Manichean misconstruction of Marcia Bates' work," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 2038-2044, October.
    19. Pin Li & Guoli Yang & Chuanqi Wang, 2019. "Visual topical analysis of library and information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1753-1791, December.
    20. Howard D. White, 2018. "Pennants for Garfield: bibliometrics and document retrieval," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 757-778, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.