IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v75y2024i7p829-843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical exploration of the subjectivity problem of information qualities

Author

Listed:
  • Frans Van der Sluis
  • Julien Faure
  • Sofie Phutachard Homnual

Abstract

Information qualities such as usefulness, accuracy, and comprehensiveness are to some extent subjective. Information resources have different meanings to different people and at different moments. This apparent subjectivity hinders indexing based on qualities for retrieval and filtering purposes. We conceptualize this as the subjectivity problem and address it through two studies. Study One explores whether, on public fora, people consider qualities as claims they should agree upon. Study Two explores, through a vignettes study, which conditions foster this inter‐subjective validity of quality claims. We conclude that information qualities become agreeable given the right set of conditions. We discuss the need for transparency about information qualities and quality considerations in order to offer these conditions to end users.

Suggested Citation

  • Frans Van der Sluis & Julien Faure & Sofie Phutachard Homnual, 2024. "An empirical exploration of the subjectivity problem of information qualities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(7), pages 829-843, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:7:p:829-843
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24884
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ofer Arazy & Rick Kopak, 2011. "On the measurability of information quality," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 89-99, January.
    2. Tefko Saracevic, 2007. "Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 2126-2144, November.
    3. Yunjie Xu, 2007. "Relevance judgment in epistemic and hedonic information searches," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(2), pages 179-189, January.
    4. Frans Sluis & Egon L. Broek & Richard J. Glassey & Elisabeth M. A. G. Dijk & Franciska M. G. Jong, 2014. "When complexity becomes interesting," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(7), pages 1478-1500, July.
    5. Ronald E. Robertson & Jon Green & Damian J. Ruck & Katherine Ognyanova & Christo Wilson & David Lazer, 2023. "Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google Search," Nature, Nature, vol. 618(7964), pages 342-348, June.
    6. Besiki Stvilia & Michael B. Twidale & Linda C. Smith & Les Gasser, 2008. "Information quality work organization in wikipedia," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 983-1001, April.
    7. Reijo Savolainen, 2011. "Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1243-1256, July.
    8. Ofer Arazy & Rick Kopak, 2011. "On the measurability of information quality," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 89-99, January.
    9. Pia Borlund, 2003. "The concept of relevance in IR," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(10), pages 913-925, August.
    10. Fox, John, 2003. "Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 8(i15).
    11. Reijo Savolainen, 2011. "Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1243-1256, July.
    12. Helland, Leif & Iachan, Felipe S. & Juelsrud, Ragnar E. & Nenov, Plamen T., 2021. "Information quality and regime change: Evidence from the lab," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 538-554.
    13. Tefko Saracevic, 2007. "Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 1915-1933, November.
    14. Lu Xiao & Nicole Askin, 2014. "What influences online deliberation? A wikipedia study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(5), pages 898-910, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frans van der Sluis & Egon L. van den Broek, 2023. "Feedback beyond accuracy: Using eye‐tracking to detect comprehensibility and interest during reading," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 3-16, January.
    2. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    3. Wayne de Fremery & Michael K. Buckland, 2022. "Context, relevance, and labor," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1268-1278, September.
    4. Lingnan He & Haoshen Yang & Xiling Xiong & Kaisheng Lai, 2019. "Online Rumor Transmission Among Younger and Older Adults," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    5. Roland Grad & Pierre Pluye & Vera Granikov & Janique Johnson‐Lafleur & Michael Shulha & Soumya Bindiganavile Sridhar & Jonathan L. Moscovici & Gillian Bartlett & Alain C. Vandal & Bernard Marlow & Lor, 2011. "Physicians' assessment of the value of clinical information: Operationalization of a theoretical model," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1884-1891, October.
    6. Yen-Liang Chen & Chia-Ling Chang & An-Qiao Sung, 2021. "Predicting eWOM’s Influence on Purchase Intention Based on Helpfulness, Credibility, Information Quality and Professionalism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 0. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    8. Wonchan Choi, 2020. "Older adultsʼ credibility assessment of online health information: An exploratory study using an extended typology of web credibility," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1295-1307, November.
    9. McClure, Clair & Seock, Yoo-Kyoung, 2020. "The role of involvement: Investigating the effect of brand's social media pages on consumer purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Julianne Sansa-Otim & Mary Nsabagwa & Andrew Mwesigwa & Becky Faith & Mojisola Owoseni & Olayinka Osuolale & Daudi Mboma & Ben Khemis & Peter Albino & Samuel Owusu Ansah & Maureen Abla Ahiataku & Vict, 2022. "An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Weather Information Dissemination among Farmers and Policy Makers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Maram Hasanain & Tamer Elsayed, 2022. "Studying effectiveness of Web search for fact checking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(5), pages 738-751, May.
    12. Zhang, Lei & Kopak, Rick & Freund, Luanne & Rasmussen, Edie, 2011. "Making functional units functional: The role of rhetorical structure in use of scholarly journal articles," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 21-29.
    13. Gineke Wiggers & Suzan Verberne & Wouter van Loon & Gerrit‐Jan Zwenne, 2023. "Bibliometric‐enhanced legal information retrieval: Combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(8), pages 1010-1025, August.
    14. Dana Nayer & Mosi Rosenboim & Miki Malul, 2022. "The damages of negative information: illustration from two markets," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(3), pages 283-295, September.
    15. Howard D. White, 2015. "Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory: examples from the humanities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2275-2299, March.
    16. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 2020. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 961-983, August.
    17. Lei Li & Xue Song & Shujun Liu & Kun Huang, 2021. "Defining High-Quality Answers on a Chinese Tourism Q&A Platform in Terms of Information Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Chung-Tzer Liu & Yi Maggie Guo & Jo-Li Hsu, 2023. "Creating and Validating an Information Quality Scale for E-Commerce Platforms," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 21(1), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Andrea S. Grunst & Melissa L. Grunst, 2015. "Context-dependent relationships between multiple sexual pigments and paternal effort," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(4), pages 1170-1179.
    20. Ian Ruthven, 2021. "Resonance and the experience of relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(5), pages 554-569, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:7:p:829-843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.