IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v64y2013i1p18-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoli Huang
  • Dagobert Soergel

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoli Huang & Dagobert Soergel, 2013. "Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 18-35, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:18-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/asi.22811
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald J. Hillman, 1964. "The notion of relevance (I)," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 26-34, January.
    2. Yunjie Xu & Dong Wang, 2008. "Order effect in relevance judgment," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(8), pages 1264-1275, June.
    3. Ying Sun & Paul B. Kantor & Emile L. Morse, 2011. "Using cross‐evaluation to evaluate interactive QA systems," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(9), pages 1653-1665, September.
    4. Thomas J. Froehlich, 1994. "Relevance reconsidered—Towards an agenda for the 21st century: Introduction to special topic issue on relevance research," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(3), pages 124-134, April.
    5. Youngok Choi & Edie M. Rasmussen, 2003. "Searching for images: The analysis of users' queries for image retrieval in American history," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(6), pages 498-511, April.
    6. Rebecca Green, 1995. "Topical relevance relationships. I. Why topic matching fails," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 46(9), pages 646-653, October.
    7. P. D. Bruza & D. W. Song & K. F. Wong, 2000. "Aboutness from a commonsense perspective," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(12), pages 1090-1105.
    8. Tefko Saracevic, 1975. "RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 26(6), pages 321-343, November.
    9. C. D. Gull, 1956. "Seven years of work on the organization of materials in the special library," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 320-329, October.
    10. Rebecca Green & Carol A. Bean, 1995. "Topical relevance relationships. II. An exploratory study and preliminary typology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 46(9), pages 654-662, October.
    11. Peiling Wang & Marilyn Domas White, 1999. "A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(2), pages 98-114.
    12. Ying Sun & Paul B. Kantor & Emile L. Morse, 2011. "Using cross-evaluation to evaluate interactive QA systems," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(9), pages 1653-1665, September.
    13. Stephen P. Harter, 1992. "Psychological relevance and information science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 43(9), pages 602-615, October.
    14. Michael Eisenberg & Carol Barry, 1988. "Order effects: A study of the possible influence of presentation order on user judgments of document relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 39(5), pages 293-300, September.
    15. William S. Cooper, 1973. "On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(2), pages 87-100, March.
    16. Yunjie (Calvin) Xu & Zhiwei Chen, 2006. "Relevance judgment: What do information users consider beyond topicality?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(7), pages 961-973, May.
    17. Stuart A. Sutton, 1994. "The role of attorney mental models of law in case relevance determinations: An exploratory analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(3), pages 186-200, April.
    18. David Bodoff, 2006. "Relevance for browsing, relevance for searching," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(1), pages 69-86, January.
    19. R. A. Fairthorne, 1956. "The patterns of retrieval," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 65-70, April.
    20. William Hersh, 1994. "Relevance and retrieval evaluation: Perspectives from medicine," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(3), pages 201-206, April.
    21. Peiling Wang & Dagobert Soergel, 1998. "A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. Document selection," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(2), pages 115-133, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathalie Demoulin & Kristof Coussement, 2018. "Acceptance of text-mining systems: The signaling role of information quality," Post-Print hal-02111772, HAL.
    2. Juan Xie & Hongru Lu & Lele Kang & Ying Cheng, 2022. "Citing criteria and its effects on researcher's intention to cite: A mixed‐method study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1079-1091, August.
    3. Wayne de Fremery & Michael K. Buckland, 2022. "Context, relevance, and labor," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1268-1278, September.
    4. Ian Ruthven, 2021. "Resonance and the experience of relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(5), pages 554-569, May.
    5. Anton van der Vegt & Guido Zuccon & Bevan Koopman, 2021. "Do better search engines really equate to better clinical decisions? If not, why not?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 141-155, February.
    6. Antonio Maria Rinaldi & Cristiano Russo & Cristian Tommasino, 2020. "A Knowledge-Driven Multimedia Retrieval System Based on Semantics and Deep Features," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Jingfei Li & Peng Zhang & Dawei Song & Yue Wu, 2017. "Understanding an enriched multidimensional user relevance model by analyzing query logs," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2743-2754, December.
    8. Yu Chi & Daqing He & Wei Jeng, 2020. "Laypeople's source selection in online health information‐seeking process," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(12), pages 1484-1499, December.
    9. Howard D. White, 2010. "Some new tests of relevance theory in information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(3), pages 653-667, June.
    10. Tahamtan, Iman & Bornmann, Lutz, 2018. "Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 203-216.
    11. Yunxue Cui & Yongzhen Wang & Xiaozhong Liu & Xianwen Wang & Xuhong Zhang, 2023. "Multidimensional scholarly citations: Characterizing and understanding scholars' citation behaviors," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 115-127, January.
    12. Aurora González-Teruel & Gregorio González-Alcaide & Maite Barrios & María-Francisca Abad-García, 2015. "Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 687-705, May.
    13. Ling-Ling Wu & Mu-Hsuan Huang & Ching-Yi Chen, 2012. "Citation patterns of the pre-web and web-prevalent environments: The moderating effects of domain knowledge," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2182-2194, November.
    14. Gineke Wiggers & Suzan Verberne & Wouter van Loon & Gerrit‐Jan Zwenne, 2023. "Bibliometric‐enhanced legal information retrieval: Combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(8), pages 1010-1025, August.
    15. Howard D. White, 2015. "Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory: examples from the humanities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2275-2299, March.
    16. Honglin Bao & Misha Teplitskiy, 2024. "A simulation-based analysis of the impact of rhetorical citations in science," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Pierre Pluye & Roland Grad & Carol Repchinsky & Barbara Jovaisas & Janique Johnson-Lafleur & Marie-Eve Carrier & Vera Granikov & Barbara Farrell & Charo Rodriguez & Gillian Bartlett & Carmen Loiselle , 2013. "Four levels of outcomes of information-seeking: A mixed methods study in primary health care," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 108-125, January.
    18. Malcolm Dow & Peter Willett & Roderick McDonald & Belver Griffith & Michael Greenacre & Peter Bryant & Daniel Wartenberg & Ove Frank, 1987. "Book reviews," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 4(2), pages 245-278, September.
    19. Nigel Harwood, 2008. "Publication outlets and their effect on academic writers’ citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(2), pages 253-265, November.
    20. repec:jtr:journl:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:12-37 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Lanu Kim & Jason H. Portenoy & Jevin D. West & Katherine W. Stovel, 2020. "Scientific journals still matter in the era of academic search engines and preprint archives," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(10), pages 1218-1226, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:18-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.