IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijrema/v30y2013i4p323-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EMAC Distinguished Marketing Scholar 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent, Gilles

Abstract

Consumer research suffers from a lack of respect for data. Researchers routinely fail to report full experiments that do not produce expected results and often eliminate alleged “outliers” on the basis of inappropriate rules, leading to biased test reports. Scholars appear to be relying less on non-experimental data, even as the serious limitations of experimental data may create structural discrepancies with the other, non-experimental cases of a phenomenon or process, such that it becomes impossible to study some major consumer phenomena. The lessons from empirical data get accepted only when they can be described as confirming preexisting conceptual frameworks. This article presents an extensive analysis of multiple forms of a lack of respect for the data and proposes some remedies. Overall, data should never play a subordinate part.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent, Gilles, 2013. "EMAC Distinguished Marketing Scholar 2012," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 323-334.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:30:y:2013:i:4:p:323-334
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.07.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811613000815
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.07.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evanschitzky, Heiner & Baumgarth, Carsten & Hubbard, Raymond & Armstrong, J. Scott, 2007. "Replication research's disturbing trend," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 411-415, April.
    2. Echo Wen Wan & Derek D. Rucker, 2013. "Confidence and Construal Framing: When Confidence Increases versus Decreases Information Processing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(5), pages 977-992.
    3. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Gilles Laurent, 1985. "Measuring consumer involvement profiles," Post-Print hal-00786781, HAL.
    4. Peterson, Robert A, 2001. "On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second-Order Meta-analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 450-461, December.
    5. Joseph W. Alba, 2012. "In Defense of Bumbling," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(6), pages 981-987.
    6. John P A Ioannidis, 2005. "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(8), pages 1-1, August.
    7. Gilles Laurent, 2000. "Improving the External Validity of Marketing Models: A Plea For More Qualitative Input," Post-Print hal-00819502, HAL.
    8. Sim, C.H. & Gan, F.F. & Chang, T.C., 2005. "Outlier Labeling With Boxplot Procedures," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 642-652, June.
    9. Albers, Sönke, 2012. "Optimizable and implementable aggregate response modeling for marketing decision support," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 111-122.
    10. Ed Yong, 2012. "Replication studies: Bad copy," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 298-300, May.
    11. Joseph Henrich & Steve J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?," RatSWD Working Papers 139, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    12. Claudia Townsend & Wendy Liu, 2012. "Is Planning Good for You? The Differential Impact of Planning on Self-Regulation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 688-703.
    13. Mark Uncles & Andrew Ehrenberg & Kathy Hammond, 1995. "Patterns of Buyer Behavior: Regularities, Models, and Extensions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3_supplem), pages 71-78.
    14. Gilles Laurent & Jean-Noel Kapferer & Françoise Roussel, 1995. "The Underlying Structure of Brand Awareness Scores," Post-Print hal-00458457, HAL.
    15. Mary Frances Luce & Ann McGill & Laura Peracchio, 2012. "Promoting an Environment of Scientific Integrity: Individual and Community Responsibilities," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 1-1.
    16. Gilles Laurent & Jean-Noël Kapferer & Françoise Roussel, 1995. "The Underlying Structure of Brand Awareness Scores," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3_supplem), pages 170-179.
    17. Shane Frederick, 2012. "Overestimating Others' Willingness to Pay," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 1-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sorensen, Herb & Bogomolova, Svetlana & Anderson, Katherine & Trinh, Giang & Sharp, Anne & Kennedy, Rachel & Page, Bill & Wright, Malcolm, 2017. "Fundamental patterns of in-store shopper behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 182-194.
    2. Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2020. "Retailing and retailing research in the age of big data analytics," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 3-14.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annette N. Brown & Drew B. Cameron & Benjamin D. K. Wood, 2014. "Quality evidence for policymaking: I'll believe it when I see the replication," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 215-235, September.
    2. Daniele Fanelli, 2012. "Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 891-904, March.
    3. Francisco J. Conejo & Lawrence F. Cunningham & Clifford E. Young, 2020. "Revisiting the Brand Luxury Index: new empirical evidence and future directions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 108-122, January.
    4. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    5. Tiziana Medda & Vittorio Pelligra & Tommaso Reggiani, 2021. "Lab-Sophistication: Does Repeated Participation in Laboratory Experiments Affect Pro-Social Behaviour?," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Li, Zhaolin & Ryan, Jennifer K. & Sun, Daewon, 2017. "Selling through outlets: The impact of quality, product development risk, and market awareness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 71-80.
    7. Raphaëlle Lambert-Pandraud & Gilles Laurent & Etienne Mullet & Carolyn Yoon, 2017. "Impact of age on brand awareness sets: a turning point in consumers’ early 60s," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 205-218, June.
    8. Walsh, Gianfranco & Northington, William Magnus & Hille, Patrick & Dose, David, 2015. "Service employees' willingness to report complaints scale: Cross-country application and replication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 500-506.
    9. Veljko Jovanović, 2019. "Evaluation of Domain Satisfaction Measure in Cross-National Perspective: Evidence from Austria and Four Countries of the Former Yugoslavia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 1369-1385, February.
    10. Bradley Voytek, 2016. "The Virtuous Cycle of a Data Ecosystem," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-6, August.
    11. V. Pelligra & T. Reggiani & T. Medda, 2016. "Does Experience Affect Fairness, Reciprocity and Cooperation in Lab Experiments?," Working Paper CRENoS 201610, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    12. Peterson, Robert A. & Merunka, Dwight R., 2014. "Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 1035-1041.
    13. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy, 2019. "Like student like manager? Using student subjects in managerial debiasing research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 347-376, April.
    14. Chandon, Jean-Louis & Laurent, Gilles & Lambert-Pandraud, Raphaëlle, 2022. "Battling for consumer memory: Assessing brand exclusiveness and brand dominance from citation-list," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 468-481.
    15. van Aert, Robbie Cornelis Maria, 2018. "Dissertation R.C.M. van Aert," MetaArXiv eqhjd, Center for Open Science.
    16. Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Inge Geyskens, 2014. "Manufacturer and Retailer Strategies to Impact Store Brand Share: Global Integration, Local Adaptation, and Worldwide Learning," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 6-26, January.
    17. Santiago Sanchez-Pages & Claudia Rodriguez-Ruiz & Enrique Turiegano, 2014. "Facial Masculinity: How the Choice of Measurement Method Enables to Detect Its Influence on Behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-10, November.
    18. Samir Mamadehussene & Francisco Silva, 2023. "Modeling Competition over Multiple Variables under Limited Consumer Awareness," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 192-211, March.
    19. Maity, Moutusy & Dass, Mayukh & Malhotra, Naresh K., 2014. "The Antecedents and Moderators of Offline Information Search: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 233-254.
    20. Remoundou, Kyriaki & Drichoutis, Andreas & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2010. "Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results?," MPRA Paper 25553, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:30:y:2013:i:4:p:323-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-research-in-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.