IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijocip/v27y2019ics1874548219301222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A leakage risk assessment method for hazardous liquid pipeline based on Markov chain Monte Carlo

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zhengbing
  • Feng, Huixia
  • Liang, Yongtu
  • Xu, Ning
  • Nie, Siming
  • Zhang, Haoran

Abstract

Pipeline is now a commonly-used transportation mode for hazardous liquid, whereas followed by frequent pipeline leakage accidents. Research on the leakage post-assessment of hazard liquid pipeline has received increasing attention, but the in-situ data are hard to be accurately captured, resulting in a series of uncertainties affecting the accuracy and practicality of the risk assessment. This paper puts forward a novel method, which is able to accurately achieve leakage detection, cause analysis and leakage volume forecast by avoiding deviation of in-situ data, model parameters and the uncertainties caused by method, thereby quickly assessing the impact on the surrounding environment. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm is employed for repeatedly sampling leakage position and coefficient, furthermore, the transient hydrothermal and the leakage risk assessment model are established for determining the leakage volume and the risk grade. The influence of real-time measurement data and the deviation of the method are taken into consideration through the frequency distribution statistics of numerous sampling data. Based on two real examples, it is verified that the risk assessment method has practical value for the in-situ analysis and emergency treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zhengbing & Feng, Huixia & Liang, Yongtu & Xu, Ning & Nie, Siming & Zhang, Haoran, 2019. "A leakage risk assessment method for hazardous liquid pipeline based on Markov chain Monte Carlo," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:27:y:2019:i:c:s1874548219301222
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.100325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548219301222
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.100325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skogdalen, Jon Espen & Vinnem, Jan Erik, 2011. "Quantitative risk analysis offshore—Human and organizational factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 468-479.
    2. Li, Yuyin & Zhang, Yahui & Kennedy, David, 2018. "Reliability analysis of subsea pipelines under spatially varying ground motions by using subset simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 74-83.
    3. Shortridge, Julie & Aven, Terje & Guikema, Seth, 2017. "Risk assessment under deep uncertainty: A methodological comparison," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 12-23.
    4. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    5. Yu, Xuchao & Liang, Wei & Zhang, Laibin & Reniers, Genserik & Lu, Linlin, 2018. "Risk assessment of the maintenance process for onshore oil and gas transmission pipelines under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 50-67.
    6. Colvin, Matthew & Maravelias, Christos T., 2011. "R&D pipeline management: Task interdependencies and risk management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 616-628, December.
    7. Zhang, Haoran & Liang, Yongtu & Liao, Qi & Wu, Mengyu & Yan, Xiaohan, 2017. "A hybrid computational approach for detailed scheduling of products in a pipeline with multiple pump stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 612-628.
    8. Garshasbi, Samira & Kurnitski, Jarek & Mohammadi, Yousef, 2016. "A hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Monte Carlo simulation approach to predict hourly energy consumption and generation by a cluster of Net Zero Energy Buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 626-637.
    9. Rahmadi, Arie & Aye, Lu & Moore, Graham, 2013. "The feasibility and implications for conventional liquid fossil fuel of the Indonesian biofuel target in 2025," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 12-21.
    10. Hughes, Larry & de Jong, Moniek & Wang, Xiao Qin, 2016. "A generic method for analyzing the risks to energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 895-908.
    11. B. Zhao, 2014. "Qingdao pipeline explosion: introductions and reflections," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 1299-1305, November.
    12. Hongyang Yu & Faisal Khan & Brian Veitch, 2017. "A Flexible Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Technique for Risk Analysis of Major Accidents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(9), pages 1668-1682, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Jianqin & Dai, Yuanhao & Liang, Yongtu & Liao, Qi & Zhang, Haoran, 2020. "An online real-time estimation tool of leakage parameters for hazardous liquid pipelines," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    2. Baikang Zhu & Xu Yang & Jun Wang & Chuanhui Shao & Fei Li & Bingyuan Hong & Debin Song & Jian Guo, 2022. "Third-Party Damage Model of a Natural Gas Pipeline Based on a Bayesian Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Zheng, Jianqin & Wang, Chang & Liang, Yongtu & Liao, Qi & Li, Zhuochao & Wang, Bohong, 2022. "Deeppipe: A deep-learning method for anomaly detection of multi-product pipelines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yifei & Xie, Mingjiang & Su, Chun, 2024. "Multi-objective maintenance strategy for corroded pipelines considering the correlation of different failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Zheng, Jianqin & Dai, Yuanhao & Liang, Yongtu & Liao, Qi & Zhang, Haoran, 2020. "An online real-time estimation tool of leakage parameters for hazardous liquid pipelines," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    3. Lam, C.Y. & Cruz, A.M., 2019. "Risk analysis for consumer-level utility gas and liquefied petroleum gas incidents using probabilistic network modeling: A case study of gas incidents in Japan," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 198-212.
    4. Gundula Glowka & Andreas Kallmünzer & Anita Zehrer, 2021. "Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1213-1231, September.
    5. Zhang, Xiaolei & Hu, Longhua & Delichatsios, Michael A. & Zhang, Jianping, 2019. "Experimental study on flame morphologic characteristics of wall attached non-premixed buoyancy driven turbulent flames," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    6. Ascione, Fabrizio & De Masi, Rosa Francesca & de Rossi, Filippo & Ruggiero, Silvia & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: Performance analysis of residential case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 938-957.
    7. Wang, Zifeng & Li, Suzhen, 2020. "Data-driven risk assessment on urban pipeline network based on a cluster model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Kasai, Naoya & Matsuhashi, Shigemi & Sekine, Kazuyoshi, 2013. "Accident occurrence model for the risk analysis of industrialfacilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 71-74.
    9. Yu, Weichao & Huang, Weihe & Wen, Kai & Zhang, Jie & Liu, Hongfei & Wang, Kun & Gong, Jing & Qu, Chunxu, 2021. "Subset simulation-based reliability analysis of the corroding natural gas pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Stefano Cucurachi & Carlos Felipe Blanco & Bernhard Steubing & Reinout Heijungs, 2022. "Implementation of uncertainty analysis and moment‐independent global sensitivity analysis for full‐scale life cycle assessment models," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 374-391, April.
    11. Bhowmik, Chiranjib & Bhowmik, Sumit & Ray, Amitava & Pandey, Krishna Murari, 2017. "Optimal green energy planning for sustainable development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 796-813.
    12. Teng, Kuei-Yung & Thekdi, Shital A. & Lambert, James H., 2012. "Identification and evaluation of priorities in the business process of a risk or safety organization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 74-86.
    13. Liu, Zhichen & Li, Ying & Zhang, Zhaoyi & Yu, Wenbo, 2022. "A new evacuation accessibility analysis approach based on spatial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. He, Rui & Zhu, Jingyu & Chen, Guoming & Tian, Zhigang, 2022. "A real-time probabilistic risk assessment method for the petrochemical industry based on data monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    15. Guizhen Zhang & Vinh V. Thai & Adrian Wing‐Keung Law & Kum Fai Yuen & Hui Shan Loh & Qingji Zhou, 2020. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of Seafarers’ Nonfatal Injuries Due to Occupational Accidents Based on Bayesian Network Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 8-23, January.
    16. Helal Zaabi & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "Modeling and analyzing project interdependencies in project portfolios using an integrated social network analysis-fuzzy TOPSIS MICMAC approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1083-1106, December.
    17. Li, Chao & Diao, Yucheng & Li, Hong-Nan & Pan, Haiyang & Ma, Ruisheng & Han, Qiang & Xing, Yihan, 2023. "Seismic performance assessment of a sea-crossing cable-stayed bridge system considering soil spatial variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    18. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Zhu, Bo & Deng, Yuanyue & Hu, Xin, 2023. "Global energy security: Do internal and external risk spillovers matter? A multilayer network method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    20. Zhu, Bo & Deng, Yuanyue & Lin, Renda & Hu, Xin & Chen, Pingshe, 2022. "Energy security: Does systemic risk spillover matter? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:27:y:2019:i:c:s1874548219301222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-critical-infrastructure-protection .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.