IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v120y2016i11p1279-1292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient satisfaction, e-health and the evolution of the patient–general practitioner relationship: Evidence from an Italian survey

Author

Listed:
  • De Rosis, Sabina
  • Barsanti, Sara

Abstract

Scientific and public interest in the use of the Internet for health-related purposes has grown considerably. Concerns regarding its impact on patient–doctor relationship and risks for patients have inflamed the debate. Literature provides scarce evidence in this field. This paper investigates whether a patient’s decision to use the web also depends on previous experience and satisfaction with healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • De Rosis, Sabina & Barsanti, Sara, 2016. "Patient satisfaction, e-health and the evolution of the patient–general practitioner relationship: Evidence from an Italian survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1279-1292.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:120:y:2016:i:11:p:1279-1292
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851016302421
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nuti, Sabina & Seghieri, Chiara, 2014. "Is variation management included in regional healthcare governance systems? Some proposals from Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 71-78.
    2. Sara Rubinelli & Peter Schulz & Kent Nakamoto, 2009. "Health literacy beyond knowledge and behaviour: letting the patient be a patient," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(5), pages 307-311, October.
    3. Lemire, Marc & Sicotte, Claude & Paré, Guy, 2008. "Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 130-140, October.
    4. Murante, Anna Maria & Vainieri, Milena & Rojas, Diana & Nuti, Sabina, 2014. "Does feedback influence patient - professional communication? Empirical evidence from Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 273-280.
    5. Dedding, Christine & van Doorn, Roesja & Winkler, Lex & Reis, Ria, 2011. "How will e-health affect patient participation in the clinic? A review of e-health studies and the current evidence for changes in the relationship between medical professionals and patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 49-53, January.
    6. Anderson, Joan M., 1996. "Empowering patients: Issues and strategies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 697-705, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuzmina Jekaterina, 2017. "Measuring Patients′ Satisfaction in For-Profit Orthopedic Hospital," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 16-26, November.
    2. Yuhui Ruan & Chenyang Zhuang & Weisin Chen & Jinyu Xie & Yaodong Zhao & Lufa Zhang & Hong Lin, 2021. "Limited knowledge and distrust are important social factors of out‐patient’ s ‘inappropriate diagnosed seeking behaviour’: a qualitative research in Shanghai," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 847-865, May.
    3. Adela Laura Popa & Naiana Nicoleta Ţarcă & Dinu Vlad Sasu & Simona Aurelia Bodog & Remus Dorel Roşca & Teodora Mihaela Tarcza, 2022. "Exploring Marketing Insights for Healthcare: Trends and Perspectives Based on Literature Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Barsanti, Sara & Walker, Kevin & Seghieri, Chiara & Rosa, Antonella & Wodchis, Walter P., 2017. "Consistency of priorities for quality improvement for nursing homes in Italy and Canada: A comparison of optimization models of resident satisfaction," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 862-869.
    5. Schmidt, Henrike & Wild, Eva-Maria & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2021. "Explaining variation in health information seeking behaviour – Insights from a multilingual survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 618-626.
    6. Javier Del Hoyo & Pilar Nos & Raquel Faubel & Guillermo Bastida & Diana Muñoz & Elena Valero-Pérez & Alejandro Garrido-Marín & Pablo Bella & Beatriz Peña & Claudia Savini & Mariam Aguas, 2020. "Adaptation of TECCU App Based on Patients´ Perceptions for the Telemonitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Marsha A. Ivey & Graeme P. Maguire & Brett G. Toelle & Guy B. Marks & Michael J. Abramson & Richard Wood-Baker, 2019. "Characteristics in Stages of Change and Decisional Balance among Smokers: The Burden of Obstructive Lung Diseases (BOLD)-Australia Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Bernardi, Roberta & Wu, Philip F., 2022. "Online health communities and the patient-doctor relationship: An institutional logics perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernardi, Roberta & Wu, Philip F., 2022. "Online health communities and the patient-doctor relationship: An institutional logics perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Vainieri, Milena & Vola, Federico & Gomez Soriano, Gregorio & Nuti, Sabina, 2016. "How to set challenging goals and conduct fair evaluation in regional public health systems. Insights from Valencia and Tuscany Regions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1270-1278.
    3. Anna Forsberg & Andreas Rantala, 2020. "The Being Taken Seriously Questionnaire—Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a PREM Measure for Person-Centeredness in a High-Tech Hospital Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Schmidt, Henrike & Wild, Eva-Maria & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2021. "Explaining variation in health information seeking behaviour – Insights from a multilingual survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 618-626.
    5. Francesca Casalini & Chiara Seghieri & Michele Emdin & Sabina Nuti, 2017. "Nuovi strumenti di management per la gestione integrata dei percorsi assistenziali dei pazienti cronici," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(102), pages 35-59.
    6. Sara Rubinelli & Alexander Ort & Claudia Zanini & Maddalena Fiordelli & Nicola Diviani, 2021. "Strengthening Critical Health Literacy for Health Information Appraisal: An Approach from Argumentation Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, June.
    7. Mifsud, Matthieu & Molines, Mathieu & Cases, Anne-Sophie & N'Goala, Gilles, 2019. "It's MY health care program: Enhancing patient adherence through psychological ownership," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 307-315.
    8. Barsanti, Sara & Walker, Kevin & Seghieri, Chiara & Rosa, Antonella & Wodchis, Walter P., 2017. "Consistency of priorities for quality improvement for nursing homes in Italy and Canada: A comparison of optimization models of resident satisfaction," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 862-869.
    9. Khoo, Su-ming, 2012. "Re-interpreting the citizen consumer: Alternative consumer activism and the rights to health and development," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 14-19.
    10. Wu, Jen-Her & Kao, Hao-Yun & Sambamurthy, Vallabh, 2016. "The integration effort and E-health compatibility effect and the mediating role of E-health synergy on hospital performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1288-1300.
    11. Neresini, Federico & Crabu, Stefano & Di Buccio, Emanuele, 2019. "Tracking biomedicalization in the media: Public discourses on health and medicine in the UK and Italy, 1984–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    12. Chinn, Deborah, 2011. "Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 60-67, July.
    13. Naveen R. Gowda & Abhinav Wankar & Sanjay Kumar Arya & H. Vikas & Nayana Kollalackal Narayanan & C. P. Linto, 2020. "Feedback System in Healthcare: The Why, What and How," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-52, March.
    14. Bevan, Gwyn & Evans, Alice & Nuti, Sabina, 2018. "Reputations count: why benchmarking performance is improving health care across the world," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86469, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Trondsen, Marianne V. & Tjora, Aksel & Broom, Alex & Scambler, Graham, 2018. "The symbolic affordances of a video-mediated gaze in emergency psychiatry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 87-94.
    16. Daniel Adrian Lungu & Francesca Pennucci & Sabina De Rosis & Gaetano Romano & Franca Melfi, 2020. "Implementing successful systematic Patient Reported Outcome and Experience Measures (PROMs and PREMs) in robotic oncological surgery—The role of physicians," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 773-787, May.
    17. Arthur Dubowicz & Peter J. Schulz, 2014. "Functional Validity of a Judgment Skills Measure within the Concept of Health Literacy for Sleeping Disorder Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    18. O'Cathain, Alicia & Goode, Jackie & Luff, Donna & Strangleman, Tim & Hanlon, Gerard & Greatbatch, David, 2005. "Does NHS Direct empower patients?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 1761-1771, October.
    19. McCabe, Katharine, 2016. "Mothercraft: Birth work and the making of neoliberal mothers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 177-184.
    20. Wardle, Gavin & Sanfilippo, Anthony J. & Narula, Ashrut & Kolos, Andriy & Chan, Kwan & Leong-Poi, Howard & Sasson, Zion & Woodward, Graham, 2024. "Variations and inequities in access to cardiac diagnostic services in Ontario Canada," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:120:y:2016:i:11:p:1279-1292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.