IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i18p3372-d266496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics in Stages of Change and Decisional Balance among Smokers: The Burden of Obstructive Lung Diseases (BOLD)-Australia Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marsha A. Ivey

    (School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia
    Department of ParaClinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago)

  • Graeme P. Maguire

    (Western Health, Footscray 3011, Australia)

  • Brett G. Toelle

    (Respiratory and Environmental Epidemiology Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney 2037, Australia
    Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown 2050, Australia)

  • Guy B. Marks

    (Respiratory and Environmental Epidemiology Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney 2037, Australia
    South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Michael J. Abramson

    (School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia)

  • Richard Wood-Baker

    (School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia)

Abstract

Smoking cessation remains a health promotion target. Applying the Transtheoretical Model to Australian Burden of Obstructive Lung Diseases (BOLD) data, we examined differences in stages of change (SoC) and readiness to quit decisional behaviours. Factors were identified likely to influence readiness of smokers, ≥40 years old, to quit. Analysis was restricted to current smokers classified to one of three stages: pre-contemplation (PC), contemplation (C) or preparation (P) to quit. Their ability to balance positive and negative consequences was measured using decisional balance. Among 314 smokers, 43.0% females and 60.8% overweight/obese, the distribution of SoC was: 38.1% PC, 38.3% C and 23.5% P. Overweight/obesity was associated with readiness to quit in stages C and P and there were more negative than positive attitudes towards smoking in those stages. Males were significantly heavier smokers in PC and C stages. Females used smoking cessation medication more frequently in PC stage, were more embarrassed about smoking and had greater negative reinforcements from smoking. Age started smoking and factors related to smoking history were associated with readiness to quit and increased the odds of being in stage C or P. An overweight/obese smoker was likely to be contemplating or preparing to quit. In these stages, smokers have more negative attitudes toward smoking. Starting smoking later, taking advice on cessation from health providers and using quit medications indicate increased readiness to quit. Evaluating these factors in smokers and developing cessation gain-framed messages may prove useful to healthcare providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Marsha A. Ivey & Graeme P. Maguire & Brett G. Toelle & Guy B. Marks & Michael J. Abramson & Richard Wood-Baker, 2019. "Characteristics in Stages of Change and Decisional Balance among Smokers: The Burden of Obstructive Lung Diseases (BOLD)-Australia Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3372-:d:266496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Campbell & India Bohanna & Anne Swinbourne & Yvonne Cadet-James & Dallas McKeown & Robyn McDermott, 2013. "Stages of Change, Smoking Behaviour and Readiness to Quit in a Large Sample of Indigenous Australians Living in Eight Remote North Queensland Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Dana A. Hazen & David M. Mannino & Richard Clayton, 2008. "Gender Specific Differences in the Pros and Cons of Smoking among Current Smokers in Eastern Kentucky: Implications for Future Smoking Cessation Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, December.
    3. De Rosis, Sabina & Barsanti, Sara, 2016. "Patient satisfaction, e-health and the evolution of the patient–general practitioner relationship: Evidence from an Italian survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1279-1292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmidt, Henrike & Wild, Eva-Maria & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2021. "Explaining variation in health information seeking behaviour – Insights from a multilingual survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 618-626.
    2. Kuzmina Jekaterina, 2017. "Measuring Patients′ Satisfaction in For-Profit Orthopedic Hospital," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 16-26, November.
    3. Barsanti, Sara & Walker, Kevin & Seghieri, Chiara & Rosa, Antonella & Wodchis, Walter P., 2017. "Consistency of priorities for quality improvement for nursing homes in Italy and Canada: A comparison of optimization models of resident satisfaction," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 862-869.
    4. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Bernardi, Roberta & Wu, Philip F., 2022. "Online health communities and the patient-doctor relationship: An institutional logics perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    6. Adela Laura Popa & Naiana Nicoleta Ţarcă & Dinu Vlad Sasu & Simona Aurelia Bodog & Remus Dorel Roşca & Teodora Mihaela Tarcza, 2022. "Exploring Marketing Insights for Healthcare: Trends and Perspectives Based on Literature Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Ja-yin Lee & Hyunmi Ahn & Hyeonkyeong Lee, 2018. "Factors Affecting Secondhand Smoke Avoidance Behavior of Vietnamese Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, August.
    8. James M. Davis & Leah C. Thomas & Jillian E. H. Dirkes & H. Scott Swartzwelder, 2020. "Strategies for Referring Cancer Patients in a Smoking Cessation Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Javier Del Hoyo & Pilar Nos & Raquel Faubel & Guillermo Bastida & Diana Muñoz & Elena Valero-Pérez & Alejandro Garrido-Marín & Pablo Bella & Beatriz Peña & Claudia Savini & Mariam Aguas, 2020. "Adaptation of TECCU App Based on Patients´ Perceptions for the Telemonitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Yuhui Ruan & Chenyang Zhuang & Weisin Chen & Jinyu Xie & Yaodong Zhao & Lufa Zhang & Hong Lin, 2021. "Limited knowledge and distrust are important social factors of out‐patient’ s ‘inappropriate diagnosed seeking behaviour’: a qualitative research in Shanghai," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 847-865, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3372-:d:266496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.