IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/auseab/v5y2017i1p29-43n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Patients′ Satisfaction in For-Profit Orthopedic Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Kuzmina Jekaterina

    (BA School of Business and Finance, Latvia)

Abstract

Patients′ satisfaction plays the central role in management of private hospitals, therefore the development of appropriate methodology and its adjustment to specific needs is necessary. The goal of the research is to develop and test methodology for the assessment of patient satisfaction in a private for-profit orthopedic hospital in Latvia that is consistent for results, as it should help to determine potential areas of progress in the coming periods. Moreover, satisfied patients are likely to return, to fulfil medical treatment requirements achieving better clinical results, as well as to recommend the hospital to others thus contributing to better overall performance of the organization. The results of the study show that the developed tool could be a valid instrument for measuring patient’s satisfaction, allowing to improve the existing processes inside the organization, as well as benchmark different segments in the hospital as far as possible and develop best-practice approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuzmina Jekaterina, 2017. "Measuring Patients′ Satisfaction in For-Profit Orthopedic Hospital," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 16-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:auseab:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:29-43:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/eb-2017-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2017-0002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/eb-2017-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Rosis, Sabina & Barsanti, Sara, 2016. "Patient satisfaction, e-health and the evolution of the patient–general practitioner relationship: Evidence from an Italian survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1279-1292.
    2. Winfried Zinn & Sebastian Sauer & Richard Göllner, 2016. "The German Inpatient Satisfaction Scale," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmidt, Henrike & Wild, Eva-Maria & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2021. "Explaining variation in health information seeking behaviour – Insights from a multilingual survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 618-626.
    2. Barsanti, Sara & Walker, Kevin & Seghieri, Chiara & Rosa, Antonella & Wodchis, Walter P., 2017. "Consistency of priorities for quality improvement for nursing homes in Italy and Canada: A comparison of optimization models of resident satisfaction," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 862-869.
    3. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Bernardi, Roberta & Wu, Philip F., 2022. "Online health communities and the patient-doctor relationship: An institutional logics perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    5. Adela Laura Popa & Naiana Nicoleta Ţarcă & Dinu Vlad Sasu & Simona Aurelia Bodog & Remus Dorel Roşca & Teodora Mihaela Tarcza, 2022. "Exploring Marketing Insights for Healthcare: Trends and Perspectives Based on Literature Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Marsha A. Ivey & Graeme P. Maguire & Brett G. Toelle & Guy B. Marks & Michael J. Abramson & Richard Wood-Baker, 2019. "Characteristics in Stages of Change and Decisional Balance among Smokers: The Burden of Obstructive Lung Diseases (BOLD)-Australia Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Javier Del Hoyo & Pilar Nos & Raquel Faubel & Guillermo Bastida & Diana Muñoz & Elena Valero-Pérez & Alejandro Garrido-Marín & Pablo Bella & Beatriz Peña & Claudia Savini & Mariam Aguas, 2020. "Adaptation of TECCU App Based on Patients´ Perceptions for the Telemonitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Yuhui Ruan & Chenyang Zhuang & Weisin Chen & Jinyu Xie & Yaodong Zhao & Lufa Zhang & Hong Lin, 2021. "Limited knowledge and distrust are important social factors of out‐patient’ s ‘inappropriate diagnosed seeking behaviour’: a qualitative research in Shanghai," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 847-865, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:auseab:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:29-43:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.